Pankreas Kanserinin Cerrahi Tedavisi
Özet
Pankreas kanserinin yegane küratif tedavi seçeneği cerrahi rezeksiyon olmakla birlikte, organın hayati damarlarla olan yakın anatomik ilişkisi bu ameliyatları gastrointestinal cerrahinin en karmaşık prosedürlerinden biri haline getirmektedir. Pankreas başı tümörlerinde klasik veya pilor koruyucu pankreatikoduodenektomi (Whipple) uygulanırken, gövde ve kuyruk lezyonlarında distal pankreas rezeksiyonu tercih edilmektedir. Son dönemde onkolojik başarıyı ve R0 rezeksiyon oranlarını artırmak adına "önce arter yaklaşımı" ve Radikal Antegrad Modüler Pankreato-Splenektomi (RAMPS) gibi vasküler kontrolü erken sağlayan yenilikçi cerrahi teknikler geliştirilmiştir. Çalışmalar, rutin olarak uygulanan ameliyat öncesi endoskopik safra kanalı drenajının perioperatif komplikasyon riskini artırdığını ve cerrahiyi geciktirdiğini, bu nedenle işlemin yalnızca seçilmiş vakalarda multidisipliner kararlarla yapılması gerektiğini göstermektedir. Laparoskopik ve robotik cerrahi gibi minimal invaziv yöntemler hastanede kalış süresini kısaltma avantajı sunsa da, bu operasyonların başarısı doğrudan merkezin deneyimine bağlıdır; nitekim yüksek hacimli referans merkezlerinde gerçekleştirilen müdahaleler morbidite ve mortaliteyi belirgin şekilde düşürmektedir. Cerrahi teknikler ve perioperatif bakımdaki muazzam ilerlemelere rağmen, hastalığın son derece agresif biyolojisi ve genellikle geç evrede teşhis edilmesi, uzun dönem sağkalım oranlarının istenen düzeylere ulaşmasını halen engellemektedir.
Although surgical resection remains the only curative treatment option for pancreatic cancer, the close anatomical relationship of the organ with vital vascular structures renders these operations among the most complex procedures in gastrointestinal surgery. While classic or pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple) is performed for tumors of the pancreatic head, distal pancreatectomy is preferred for body and tail lesions. Recently, innovative techniques such as the "artery-first approach" and Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS), which ensure early vascular control, have been developed to enhance oncological success and increase R0 resection rates. Studies indicate that routine preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage increases perioperative complication risks and delays definitive surgery; thus, it should be reserved only for specific indications based on multidisciplinary decisions. Although minimally invasive methods like laparoscopic and robotic surgery offer advantages such as shorter hospital stays, the success of these challenging operations heavily relies on center experience; high-volume reference centers significantly decrease morbidity and mortality rates. Despite monumental advances in surgical techniques and perioperative care, the highly aggressive biology of pancreatic cancer and its typically late-stage diagnosis still prevent long-term survival rates from reaching desired levels.
Referanslar
Malvezzi M., Bertuccio P., Levi F., La Vecchia C., Negri E.: European cancer mortality predictions for the year 2014. Ann. Oncol., 2014; 25: 1650–1656. Google Scholar
Łacko A., Polkowski W., Reguła J., Pałucki J.: W Zalecenia postępowania diagnostyczno -terapeutycznego w nowotworach złośliwych 2013 rok. Nowotwory układu pokarmowego. Rak trzustki i brodawki Vatera. http://onkologia.zalecenia.med.pl/; aktualizacja na dzień 02.21.2015. Google Scholar
Ducreux M., Sa. Cuhna A., Caramella C., Hollebecque A., Burtin P. i wsp.: Cancer of the pancreas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals of Oncology 2015; 26 (Supl. 5): 56–68. Google Scholar
James F. Griffin, Katherine E. Poruk, Christopher L. Wolfgang: Pancreatic cancer surgery: past, present, and future. Chin J Cancer Res 2015;27(4):332-348 Google Scholar
Von Mikulicz-Radecki. I.: Surgery of the Pancreas With Especial Consideration of Trauma and Inflammatory Processes. Ann Surg 1903;38:1-29. Google Scholar
Evans D.B., Lee J.E., Tamm E.P.: Operacja Whipple’a (pankreatoduodenektomia) i całkowita resekcja trzustki (pankreatektomia) w przypadku raka trzustki. w „Chirurgia” pod red J.E. Fischera Google Scholar
Skandalakis L.S., Colborn G.L., Skandalakis J.E.: „Anatomia chirurgiczna trzustki” w „Chirurgia” pod red Fischera J.E. Google Scholar
Hüttner F.J., Fitzmaurice C., Schwarzer G., Seiler C.M., Hüttner F.J., Antes G. i wsp.: Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (pp Whipple) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy (classic Whipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD006053. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006053.pub6. Google Scholar
Inoue Y., Saiura A., Yoshioka R., Ono Y, Takahashi M., Arita J. i wsp.: Pancreatoduodenectomy With Systematic Mesopancreas Dissection Using a Supracolic Anterior Artery-first Approach. Ann Surg 2015;262:1092–1101. Google Scholar
Del Chiaro M., Segersvärd R., Rangelova E: Cattell-Braasch Maneuver Combined with Artery-First Approach for Superior Mesenteric-Portal Vein Resection During Pancreatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Dec;19(12):2264-8. Google Scholar
Weitz J., Rahbari N., Koch M., Buchler M.W.: The ‘‘artery first’’ approach for resection of pancreatic head cancer. J Am Coll Surg.2010;210:e1–4. Google Scholar
Zhu J., Han D., Li X., Pan F., Ma J., Kou J. i wsp.: Inferior Infracolic ‘Superior Mesenteric Artery First’ Approach with a No-Touch Isolation Surgical Technique in Patients with a Borderline Resectable Cancer of the Pancreatic Head. Ann Surg Oncol 2016, 23:S976–S980. Google Scholar
Aosasa S., Nishikawa M., Hoshikawa M., Noro T., Yamamoto J.: Inframesocolic superior mesenteric artery first approach as an introductory procedure of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for carcinoma of the pancreatic body and tail. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20(2):450–4. Google Scholar
Kawabata Y., Hayashi H., Takai K., Kidani A., Tajima Y.: Superior mesenteric artery-first approach in radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a technique to obtain negative tangential margins. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220(5):49–54. Google Scholar
Michels N.A.: Newer anatomy ofthe liver and its variant blood supply and collateral circulation. Am J Surg 1962; 112:337-347. Google Scholar
Hiatt J.R., Gabbay J., Busuttil R.W.: Surgical Anatomy of the Hepatic Arteries in 1000 Cases. Annals of Surgery 1994; Vol. 220, No. 1, 50-52 Google Scholar
Nimura Y., Nagino M., Takao S.: Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy in radical pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2012 May;19(3):230-41. Google Scholar
Japan Pancreas Society. Classification of pancreatic carcinoma. 1st English ed. Tokyo: Kanehara & Co. Ltd.; 1996. Google Scholar
Japan Pancreas Society. Classification of pancreatic carcinoma.2nd English ed. Tokyo: Kanehara & Co. Ltd.; 2003. Google Scholar
Tol J.A., Gouma D.J., Bassi C., Dervenis C., Montorsi M., Adham M.: Definition of a standard lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A consensus statement by theInternational Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 2014;156:591-600. Google Scholar
Chandrasegaram M.D., Goldstein D., Simes J., Gebski V., Kench J. G., Gill A. J.: Meta-analysis of radical resection rates and margin assessment in pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 2015;102:1459–1472. Google Scholar
Strobel O., Hank T., Hinz U., Bergmann F., Schneider L., Springfeld C.: Pancreatic Cancer Surgery: The New R-status Counts. Ann Surg.2017 Mar; 265(3):565-573. Google Scholar
Verbeke C.S., Leitch D., Menon K.V., McMahon M.J., Guillou P.J., Anthoney A.:. Redefining the R1 resection in pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 2006;93:1232–1237. Google Scholar
Cazauran J.B., Perinel J., Kepenekian V., El Bechwaty M., Nappo G., Pioche M.: Unnecessary preoperative biliary drainage: impact on perioperative outcomes of resectable periampullary tumors. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2017; Oct 31. doi: 10.1007/s00423-017-1635-0. [Epub ahead of print] Google Scholar
Lai E.C., Lau S.H., Lau W.Y.: The current status of preoper a tive bi l i ary drainage for patients who receive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary carcinoma: a comprehensive review. Surgeon 2014;12(5):290–296 Google Scholar
Saleh M.M.A., Nørregaard P., Jørgensen H.L., Andersen P.K., Matzen P.: Preoperative endoscopic stent placement before pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of the effect on morbidity and mortality. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2002; 56(4):529–534 Google Scholar
Sewnath M.E., Karsten T.M., Prins M.H., Rauws E.J., Obertop H., Gouma D.J.: A meta-analysis on the efficacy of preoperative biliary drainage for tumors causing obstructive jaundice. Ann. Surg. 2002; 236(1):17 Google Scholar
van der Gaag N.A., Rauws E.A., van Eijck C.H., Bruno M.J., van der Harst E., Kubben F.J. i wsp.: Preoperative biliary drainage for cancer of the head of the pancreas. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010; 362(2):129–137. Google Scholar
Cui P.J.: Biliary stenting with or without sphincterotomy for malignant biliary obstruction: a meta-analysis. World. J. Gastroenterol. 2014; 20(38):14033. Google Scholar
inkins L.J., Parmar A.D., Han Y., Duncan C.B., Sheffield K.M., Brown K.M.: Current trends in preoperative biliary stenting in patients with pancreatic cancer. Surgery 2013; 154(2):179–189. Google Scholar
Morris-Stiff G., Tamijmarane A., Tan Y.M., Shapey I., Bhati C., Mayer A.D.i wsp.: Pre-operative stenting is associated with a higher prevalence of post-operative complications following pancreatoduodenectomy. Int. J. Surg. 2011; 9(2):145–149. Google Scholar
Cortes A., Sauvanet A., Bert F., Janny S., Sockeel P., Kianmanesh R. i wsp.: Effect of bile contamination on immediate outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy for tumor. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2006; 202(1): 93–99. Google Scholar
Sanjeevi S., Ivanics T., Lundell L., Kartalis N., Andrén-Sandberg Å., Blomberg J. i wsp.: Impact of delay between imaging and treatment in patients with potentially curable pancreatic cancer: timing of surgery in patients with potentially curable pancreatic cancer. Br. J. Surg. 2016; 103(3):267–275. Google Scholar
Glant J.A.,Waters J.A., HouseM.G., Zyromski N.J., Nakeeb A., Pitt H.A. i wsp.: Does the interval from imaging to operation affect the rate of unanticipated metastasis encountered during operation for pancreatic adenocarcinoma? Surgery 2011; 150(4):607–616. Google Scholar
Shrikhande S.V., Kleeff J., Reiser C.: Pancreatic Resection for M1 Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Annals of Surgical Oncology 2007; 14(1):118–127. Google Scholar
Christophe M., Le Treut Y.P., Pol B., Brandone J.M., Capobianco C., Bricot R.: Cancer of the pancreas. A plea for resection 162 operated patients. Presse Med 1992; 21:741–4. Google Scholar
Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Does it have a role in the palliation of pancreatic cancer?. Ann Surg 1996; 223:718–25. Google Scholar
Pedrazzoli S., Beger H.G., Obertop H., Andrén-Sandberg A., Fernández-Cruz L., Henne-Bruns D., Lüttges J., Neoptolemos J.P.: A surgical and pathological based classification of resective treatment of pancreatic cancer. Summary of an international workshop on surgical procedures in pancreatic cancer. Dig Surg.1999;16(4):337-45. Google Scholar
Cao F., Li J., Li A.: Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy versus standard procedure in the treatment of left-sided pancreatic cancer: A systemic review and meta-analysis. BMC Surgery 2017; 17: 67 Google Scholar
Chun Y.S.: Role of Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and Pancreatic Cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. BMC Surgery 2017; 17(1):67. Google Scholar
Strasberg S.M., Drebin J.A., Linehan D.: Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy. Surgery. 2003;133(5):521–7. Google Scholar
Latona J.A., Lamb K.M., Pucci M.J., Maley W.R., Yeo C.J.: Modified Appleby Procedure with Arterial Reconstruction for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Literature Review and Report of Three Unusual Cases. J Gastrointest Surg 2016; 20:300–306. Google Scholar
Hackert T., Strobel O., Michalski C.W., Mihaljevic A.L., Mehrabi A., Müller-Stich B.: The TRIANGLE operation – radical surgery after neoadjuvant treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer: a single arm observational study. artykuł w druku, dostępny na stronie: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2017.07.007 Google Scholar
Hüttner F. J., Probst P., Knebel P., Strobel O., Hackert T., Ulrich A., Büchler M. W., Diener M. K.: Meta-analysis of prophylactic abdominal drainage in pancreatic surgery. BJS 2017; 104: 660–668. Google Scholar
Bilimoria K.Y., Bentrem D.J., Feinglass J.M., Stewart A.K., Winchester DP, Talamonti M.S. i wsp.: Directing surgical quality improvement initiatives: comparison of perioperative mortality and long-term survival for cancer surgery. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008; 26:4626–4633. Google Scholar
Gooiker G.A., Lemmens V.E., Besselink M.G., Busch O.R., Bonsing B.A., Molenaar I.Q. i wsp.: Impact of centralization of pancreatic cancer surgery on resection rates and survival. Br. J. Surg. 2014; 101:1000–1005. Google Scholar
Balzano G., Capretti G., Callea G., Cantù E., Carle F., Pezzilli R.: Overuse of surgery in patients with pancreatic cancer. A nationwide analysis in Italy. HPB (Oxford) 2016; 18(5): 470–478. Google Scholar
Qiu J., Chen S., Prasoon P., Wu H.: Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic diseases. Surgical Practice 2013; 17, 49–57. Google Scholar
Pędziwiatr M, Małczak P., Pisarska M., Major P., Wysocki M., Stefura T.: Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy - systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2017; 402:841–851. Google Scholar
Del Chiaro M., Segersvärd R: The State of the Art of Robotic Pancreatectomy. BioMed Research International Volume 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/920492.
