Mide Hastalıklarında Radyoloji
Özet
Mide hastalıklarının tanı, tedavi ve takip süreçlerinde radyolojik görüntüleme modaliteleri kritik bir öneme sahiptir. Geleneksel yöntemlerden düz karın grafisi akut durumlarda ve yabancı cisim saptanmasında tercih edilirken, çift kontrastlı grafiler mukozal inflamatuar ve neoplastik değişiklikleri ayrıntılı gösterir. Ultrasonografi (USG) ve endoskopik US (EUS), radyasyonsuz olarak mide duvar katmanlarını ve tümör evrelemesini yüksek çözünürlükle değerlendirir. Günümüzde bilgisayarlı tomografi (BT), gastrik adenokarsinom, lenfoma, gastrointestinal stromal tümörler (GİST) ve benign patolojilerin hem mural hem de ekstramural ilişkilerini saptamada ilk tercih edilen modalitedir. Ayrıca tomografi; amfizematöz gastrit, volvulus, perforasyonlar ile anastomoz veya duodenal güdük kaçağı gibi postoperatif acil komplikasyonların yönetiminde hayati rol oynar. Manyetik rezonans görüntüleme (MRG) ise yüksek yumuşak doku çözünürlüğü ve non-invaziv yapısıyla özellikle gastrik neoplazmların preoperatif evrelemesinde ve tedaviye yanıtın takibinde BT'ye benzer doğrulukla giderek daha fazla kullanım alanı bulmaktadır. Sonuç olarak, hastanın ön tanısına göre en uygun kesitsel veya konvansiyonel yöntemin seçilmesi tanısal başarıyı optimize eder.
Radiological imaging modalities hold a critical place in the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of gastric diseases. Among conventional techniques, plain abdominal radiography is utilized as a first-line examination in acute settings and for detecting foreign bodies, while double-contrast radiographs provide detailed visualization of mucosal inflammatory and neoplastic alterations. Ultrasonography (USG) and endoscopic US (EUS) offer radiation-free evaluation of gastric wall layers and tumor staging with high soft-tissue resolution. Currently, computed tomography (CT) is the preferred imaging modality to evaluate both the mural and extramural extent of gastric adenocarcinoma, lymphoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), and benign pathologies. Furthermore, CT plays a vital role in managing emergency conditions such as emphysematous gastritis, volvulus, perforations, and postoperative complications including anastomotic or duodenal stump leaks. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with its high soft-tissue contrast and non-invasive nature, is increasingly utilized with diagnostic accuracy comparable to CT, particularly in the preoperative staging of gastric neoplasms and monitoring treatment response. In conclusion, selecting the most appropriate conventional or cross-sectional imaging method based on the preliminary diagnosis optimizes diagnostic success.
Referanslar
New imaging in neurogastroenterology: an overview. Camilleri M Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2006 Sep; 18(9):805-12
Grainger RG, Allison D, Dixon AK, et al. Diagnostic Radiology: A Textbook of Medical Imaging. 4th ed. Vol. 18. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2001
Rubesin SE, Levine MS, Laufer I. Double-contrast upper gastrointestinal radiography: a pattern approach for diseases of the stomach. Radiology. 2008;246(1), 33-48.
Singh V, Alexander JA. The evaluation and management of obscure and occult gastrointestinal bleeding. Abdominal imaging. 2009;34(3), 311-319.
Ikoma N, Lee JH, Bhutani MS, et al. Preoperative accuracy of gastric cancer staging in patient selection for preoperative therapy: race may affect accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography. Journal of gastrointestinal oncology. 2017; 8(6), 1009.
Schizas D, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Tsilimigras DI, et al. The role of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of primary gastric lymphoma. Gastroenterology research and practice, 2017;2017. doi: 10.1155/2017/2397430
Ioannis M, Dimitra Z, Hristos H, et al. Peptic ulcer perforation: sonographic imaging of active fluid leakage. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound. 2006; 34(1), 38-41.
Wu L, Yen HH. Sonographic diagnosis of peptic ulcer perforation. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine. 2012; 105(12), 1217-1218.
Ryan ER, Heaslip IS. Magnetic resonance enteroclysis compared with conventional enteroclysis and computed tomography enteroclysis: a critically appraised topic. Abdominal imaging. 2008; 33(1), 34-37.
Kalayci T, Iliklerden UH. Emergency gastric cancer: Are there any differences between indications, morbidity and mortality? International Medicine 2021; 3(2):50-58.
Nagpal P, Prakash A, Pradhan G, et al. MDCT imaging of the stomach: advances and applications. The British journal of radiology. 2017; 90(1069), 20160412.
Ghimire P, Wu GY, Zhu L. Primary gastrointestinal lymphoma. World journal of gastroenterology: 2017; 17(6), 697.
Chamadol N, Wongwiwatchai J, Wachirakowit T, et al. Computed tomographic features of adenocarcinoma compared to malignant lymphoma of the stomach. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. 2011; 94(11), 1387.
Hong X, Choi H, Loyer EM, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor: role of CT in diagnosis and in response evaluation and surveillance after treatment with imatinib. Radiographics. 2006; 26(2), 481-495.
Sandrasegaran K, Rajesh A, Rydberg J, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: clinical, radiologic, and pathologic features. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2005;184(3), 803-811.
Nikou GC, Angelopoulos TP. Current concepts on gastric carcinoid tumors. Gastroenterology research and practice. 2012; 2012. doi: 10.1155/2012/287825
Corey B, Chen H. Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Stomach. The Surgical clinics of North America. 2017;97(2), 333-343.
Thompson WM, Kende AI, Levy AD. Imaging characteristics of gastric lipomas in 16 adult and pediatric patients. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2003; 181(4), 981-985.
Horton KM, Fishman EK. Current role of CT in imaging of the stomach. Radiographics. 2003; 23(1), 75-87.
Ripollés T, García-Aguayo J, Martínez MJ, et al. Gastrointestinal bezoars: sonographic and CT characteristics. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2001; 177(1), 65-69.
DuBose V TM, Southgate WM, Hill JG. Lactobezoars: a patient series and literature review. Clinical pediatrics. 2001; 40(11), 603-606.
Matsushima K, Won EJ, Tangel MR. Emphysematous gastritis and gastric emphysema: similar radiographic findings, distinct clinical entities. World journal of surgery. 2015; 39(4), 1008-1017.
Grayson DE, Abbott RM, Levy AD, et al. Emphysematous infections of the abdomen and pelvis: a pictorial review. Radiographics. 2002; 22(3), 543-561.
Peterson CM, Anderson JS, Hara AK, et al. Volvulus of the gastrointestinal tract: appearances at multimodality imaging. Radiographics. 2009; 29(5), 1281-1293.
Kalayci T, Iliklerden UH. Our Clinical Experiments of Peptic Ulcer Perforation with Literature Approache. Van Med J.2020; 27(3):335-339.
Mehanna MJ, Birjawi G, Moukaddam HA, et al. Complications of adjustable gastric banding, a radiological pictorial review. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2006; 186(2), 522-534.
Kim TH, Kim JH, Shin CI, et al. CT findings suggesting anastomotic leak and predicting the recovery period following gastric surgery. European radiology. 2015; 25(7), 1958-1966.
Kim YE, Lim JS, Hyung WJ, et al. Clinical implication of positive oral contrast computed tomography for the evaluation of postoperative leakage after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Journal of computer assisted tomography. 2010; 34(4), 537-542.
Paik HJ, Lee SH, Choi CI, et al. Duodenal stump fistula after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: risk factors, prevention, and management. Annals of surgical treatment and research. 2016; 90(3), 157-163.
Oh SY, Lee HJ, Yang HK Pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Journal of gastric cancer. 2016; 16(2), 63-71.
Guerra F, Giuliani G, Iacobone M, et al. Pancreas-related complications following gastrectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of open versus minimally invasive surgery. Surgical endoscopy. 2017; 31(11), 4346-4356.
Kim HC, Han JK, Kim KW, et al. Afferent loop obstruction after gastric cancer surgery: helical CT findings. Abdominal imaging. 2003; 28(5), 624-630.
Dilauro M, McInnes MD, Schieda N, et al. Internal hernia after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: optimal CT signs for diagnosis and clinical decision making. Radiology. 2017; 282(3), 752-760.
Gore RM, Smith CH. Postoperative stomach and duodenum. In Textbook of Gastrointestinal Radiology (pp. 707-725). WB Saunders. 2008.
Liu B, Ramalho M, AlObaidy M, et al. Gastrointestinal imaging-practical magnetic resonance imaging approach. World journal of radiology. 2014; 6(8), 544.
Maccioni F, Marcelli G, Al Ansari N, et al. Preoperative T and N staging of gastric cancer: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) versus multi detector computed tomography (MDCT). La Clinica Terapeutica. 2010; 161(2), e57-62.
Stroszczynski C, Jost D, Reichardt P, et al. Follow-up of gastro-intestinal stromal tumours (GIST) during treatment with imatinib mesylate by abdominal MRI. European radiology. 2005; 15(12), 2448-2456.
Masselli G, Colaiacomo MC, Marcelli G, et al. MRI of the small-bowel: how to differentiate primary neoplasms and mimickers. The British journal of radiology. 2012; 85(1014), 824-837.
