Pankreas Başı Tümörlerinde Cerrahi Tedavi
Özet
Pankreas başı tümörlerinde uygulanan pankreatikoduodenektomi (Whipple prosedürü), cerrahi alanda oldukça karmaşık ve yüksek riskli bir operasyondur. Bu prosedürün başarısı büyük ölçüde yüksek volümlü merkezlerin deneyimine bağlıdır. Ameliyat öncesi dönemde hastaların risk analizi, nutrisyonel optimizasyonu ve sarılığı olan vakalarda kombine preoperatif bilier drenaj uygulamaları, postoperatif komplikasyonların azaltılmasında kritik önem taşır. Rezektabilite kriterlerinin belirlenmesinde multifazik yüksek rezolüsyonlu BT en temel görüntüleme yöntemidir. Cerrahi teknik olarak konvansiyonel Whipple ve pilor koruyucu pankreatikoduodenektomi (PKPD) yaygın olarak kullanılmakta; ancak operasyon süresi ve kan kaybı PKPD yönteminde daha düşük seyretmektedir. Pankreas remnantının yönetimi için pankreatikojejunostomi (PJ) ve pankreatikogastrostomi (PG) teknikleri uygulanmakta, klinikte fistül oranlarını düşürmek amacıyla sıklıkla Blumgart duct-to-mukoza yöntemi tercih edilmektedir. Tromboprofilaksi ve profilaktik antibiyotik kullanımı standart hazırlıklar arasında yer alırken, enükleasyon prosedürü ise daha küçük ve benign lezyonlarla sınırlı kalmaktadır. Operasyon sonrasında gastrointestinal devamlılığın sağlanması ve rekonstrüksiyon tekniklerinin cerrahın deneyimine göre optimize edilmesi cerrahi başarıyı doğrudan etkiler.
Pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple procedure), performed for tumors of the pancreatic head, is a highly complex and high-risk surgical procedure. The success of this operation relies heavily on the experience of high-volume centers. Preoperative evaluation, risk factor assessment, nutritional optimization, and the implementation of combined biliary drainage in jaundiced patients are critical to reducing postoperative complications. Multiphasic high-resolution CT is the gold standard imaging modality for determining tumor resectability criteria. Modern surgical approaches include both classical Whipple and pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD), with PPPD demonstrating shorter operative times and lower blood loss. For pancreatic remnant management, pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) and pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) are utilized, with the Blumgart duct-to-mucosa technique frequently preferred in clinical practice to minimize fistula rates. Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis and prophylactic antibiotics remain standard perioperative protocols, whereas the enucleation procedure is strictly limited to smaller, benign pancreatic lesions. Ultimately, the meticulous implementation of gastrointestinal reconstruction techniques tailored to the surgeon's institutional experience directly influences survival outcomes and reduces morbidity.
Referanslar
Yeo TP, Lowenfels AB. Demographics and epidemiology of pancreatic cancer. Cancer J. 2012;18(6):477-84.
Krempien R, Muentier M, Harms W, et al., Neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients wtih pancreatic adenocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford). 2006;8(1):22-8.
Birkmeyer JD, Sun Y, Wong SL, et al. Hospital volume and late survival after cancer surgery. Ann Surg 2007; 245:777.
Fong Y, Gonen M, Rubin D, et al. Long-term survival is superior after resection for cancer in high-volume centers. Ann Surg 2005; 242:540.
Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, et al. One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg 2006; 244:10.
Braga M, Ljungqvist O, Soeters P, et al. ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition: surgery. Clin Nutr 2009; 28:378.
Mizuguchi K, Ajiki T, Onoyama T, et al. Short-term effects of external and internal biliary drainage on liver and cellular immunity in experimental obstructive jaundice. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2004; 11:176-80
Eshuis WJ, van Der Gaag NA, Rauws EA, et al. Therapeutic delay and survival after surgery for cancer of the pancreatic head with or without preoperative biliary drainage. Ann Surg. 2010; 252:840-9.
Huang X, Liang B, Zhao XQ, et al. The effects of different preoperative biliary drainage methods on complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94: e723.
Gloor B, Todd KE, Reber HA. Diagnostic workup of patients with suspected pancreatic carcinoma: the University of California-Los Angeles approach. Cancer 1997; 79:1780.
Steinberg WM, Barkin J, Bradley EL 3rd, et al. Workup of a patient with a mass in the head of the pancreas. Pancreas 1998; 17:24.
Taoka H, Hauptmann E, Traverso LW, et al. How accurate is helical computed tomography for clinical staging of pancreatic cancer? Am J Surg 1999; 177:428.
Lu DS, Reber HA, Krasny RM, et al. Local staging of pancreatic cancer: criteria for unresectability of major vessels as revealed by pancreatic-phase, thin-section helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168:1439.
Vedantham S, Lu DS, Reber HA, et al. Small peripancreatic veins: improved assessment in pancreatic cancer patients using thin-section pancreatic phase helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170:377.
American gastroenterological association medical position statement: epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology 1999; 117:1463.
Callery MP, Chang KJ, Fishman EK, et al. Pretreatment assessment of resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: expert consensus statement. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16:1727.
Al-Hawary MM, Francis IR, Chari ST, et al. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma radiology reporting template: consensus statement of the Society of Abdominal Radiology and the American Pancreatic Association. Radiology 2014 Jan; 270(1):248-260
Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Al-Hawary M, et al. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Apr 1;19(4):439-457.
Diepenhorst GM, van Ruler O, Besselink MG, et al. Influence of prophylactic probiotics and selective decontamination on bacterial translocation in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Shock 2011; 35:9.
Chew HK, Wun T, Harvey D, et al. Incidence of venous thromboembolism and its effect on survival among patients with common cancers. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166:458.
Reinke CE, Drebin JA, Kreider S, et al. Timing of preoperative pharmacoprophylaxis for pancreatic surgery patients: a venous thromboembolism reduction initiative. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19:19.
Gemenetzis G, Groot VP, Blair AB, et al. Incidence and risk factors for abdominal occult metastatic disease in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2018; 118:1277.
Tomlinson JS, Jain S, Bentrem DJ, et al. Accuracy of staging node-negative pancreas cancer: a potential quality measure. Arch Surg 2007; 142:767.
Staerkle RF, Vuille-Dit-Bille RN, Soll C, et al. Extended lymph node resection versus standard resection for pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 1:CD011490.
Redely SK, Tylera DS, Pappas TN, et al. Extended resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Oncologist 2007; 12; 654-63.
Pedrazzoli S, Di Cairo V Dionigi R, et al. Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy associated with pancreaticoduodenectomy in the surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Lymphadenectomy study group. Ann Surg 1998; 228:508-17
Evans DB, Farnell MB, Lillemoe KD, et al. Surgical treatment of resectable and borderline resectable pancreas cancer: expert consensus statement. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16:1736.
Hartel M, Neidergethmann M, Farag-Soliman M, et al. Benefit of venous resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of pancreatic head. Eur J Surg. 2002; 168; 707-12.
Shimada K, Sano T, Sakamato Y, et al. Clinical implications of combined porta vein resection as palliative procedure in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2006; 156; 9-78.
Seiler CA, Wagner M, Bachmann T, et al. Randomized clinical trial of pylorus-preserving duodenopancreatectomy versus classical Whipple resection-long term results. Br J Surg 2005; 92:547.
Lin PW, Shan YS, Lin YJ, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head cancer: PPPD versus Whipple procedure. Hepatogastroenterology 2005; 52:1601.
Wenger FA, Jacobi CA, Haubold K, et al. [Gastrointestinal quality of life after duodenopancreatectomy in pancreatic carcinoma. Preliminary results of a prospective randomized study: pancreatoduodenectomy or pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy]. Chirurg 1999; 70:1454.
Tran KT, Smeenk HG, van Eijck CH, et al. Pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy versus standard Whipple procedure: a prospective, randomized, multicenter analysis of 170 patients with pancreatic and periampullary tumors. Ann Surg 2004; 240:738.
Bloechle C, Broering DC, Latuske C, et al. Prospective randomized study to evaluate quality of life after partial pancreatoduodenectomy according to Whipple versus pylorus preserving pancreatoduodenectomy according to Longmire-Traverso for periampullary carcinoma. Dtsch Gesellschaft Chir 1999; Suppl-1:661.
Paquet KJ. Vergleich der partiellen Duodenopankreatektomie (Whipple operation) mit der pylorouserhaltenden Zephaloduodenopankreatektomie: eine prospektive kontrollierte, randomisierte Langzeitstudie. Chir Gastroenterol 1998; 14:54.
Hackert T, Probst P, Knebel P, et al. Pylorus Resection Does Not Reduce Delayed Gastric Emptying After Partial Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial (PROPP Study, DRKS00004191). Ann Surg 2018; 267:1021.
Klaiber U, Probst P, Hüttner FJ, et al. Randomized Trial of Pylorus-Preserving vs. Pylorus-Resecting Pancreatoduodenectomy: Long-Term Morbidity and Quality of Life. J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 24:341.
Hüttner FJ, Fitzmaurice C, Schwarzer G, et al. Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (pp Whipple) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy (classic Whipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 2:CD006053.
Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E, et al. Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study. Ann Surg 2005; 242:767. U 74
Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Maher MM, et al. A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 1995; 222:580.
Wellner UF, Sick O, Olschewski M, et al. Randomized controlled single-center trial comparing pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after partial pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16:1686.
Duffas JP, Suc B, Msika S, et al. A controlled randomized multicenter trial of pancreatogastrostomy or pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 2005; 189:720.
Rault A, SaCunha A, Klopfenstein D, et al. Pancreaticojejunal anastomosis is preferable to pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy for longterm outcomes of pancreatic exocrine function. J Am Coll Surg 2005; 201:239.
Keck T, Wellner UF, Bahra M, et al. Pancreatogastrostomy Versus Pancreatojejunostomy for RECOnstruction After PANCreatoduodenectomy (RECOPANC, DRKS 00000767): Perioperative and Long-term Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg 2016; 263:440.
Topal B, Fieuws S, Aerts R, et al. Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2013; 14:655.
Takano S, Ito Y, Watanabe Y, et al. Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy in reconstruction following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 2000; 87:423.
Cheng Y, Briarava M, Lai M, et al. Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction for the prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 9:CD012257.
Kilambi R, Singh AN. Duct-to-mucosa versus dunking techniques of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: Do we need more trials? A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. J Surg Oncol 2018; 117:928.
Shrikhande SV, Kleeff J, Büchler MW, et al.(2007) Pancreatic anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy: How we do it. Indian Journal of Surgery 69(6):224–229.
Kleespies A, Rentsch M, Seeliger H, et al. (2009) Blumgart anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy minimizes severe complications after pancreatic head resection. Br J Surg 96(7):741–750.
Wang SE, Shyr BU, Chen SC, et al. (2018) Comparison between robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy with modified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy: A propensity score–matched study. Surg (United States) 164(6):1162–1167.
Polanco PM, Zenati MS, Hogg ME, et al. (2016) An analysis of risk factors for pancreatic fistula after robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: outcomes from a consecutive series of standardized pancreatic reconstructions. Surg Endosc 30(4):1523–1529.
De Pastena M, van Hilst J, de Rooij T, et al. (2018) Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy With Modified Blumgart Pancreaticojejunostomy. J Vis Exp 136:56819.
Hirono S, Kawai M, Okada KI, et al. (2019) Modified Blumgart mattress suture versus conventional interrupted suture in pancreaticojejunostomy during pancreaticoduodenectomy: randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 269(2):243–251.
Kawakatsu S, Inoue Y, Mise Y, et al (2018) Comparison of pancreatojejunostomy techniques in patients with a soft pancreas: Kakita anastomosis and Blumgart anastomosis. BMC Surg 18(1):88.
Kojima T, Niguma T, Watanabe N, et al. (2018) Modified Blumgart anastomosis with the “complete packing method” reduces the incidence of pancreatic fistula and complications after resection of the head of the pancreas. Am J Surg 216(5):941–948.
Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, et al. Does pancreatic duct stenting decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Gastrointest Surg 2006; 10:128.
Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM, et al. External drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent to reduce leakage rate of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 2007; 246:425.
Motoi F, Egawa S, Rikiyama T, et al. Randomized clinical trial of external stent drainage of the pancreatic duct to reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticojejunostomy. Br J Surg 2012; 99:524.
Pessaux P, Sauvanet A, Mariette C, et al. External pancreatic duct stent decreases pancreatic fistula rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy: prospective multicenter randomized trial. Ann Surg 2011; 253:879.
Kuroki T, Tajima Y, Kitasato A, et al. Stenting versus non-stenting in pancreaticojejunostomy: a prospective study limited to a normal pancreas without fibrosis sorted by using dynamic MRI. Pancreas 2011; 40:25.
Suc B, Msika S, Fingerhut A, et al. Temporary fibrin glue occlusion of the main pancreatic duct in the prevention of intra-abdominal complications after pancreatic resection: prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 2003; 237:57.
Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL, Kim MP, et al. Does fibrin glue sealant decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Gastrointest Surg 2004; 8:766.
Deng Y, He S, Cheng Y, et al. Fibrin sealants for the prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreatic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 3:CD009621.
Ke S, Ding XM, Gao J, et al. A prospective, randomized trial of Roux-en-Y reconstruction with isolated pancreatic drainage versus conventional loop reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery 2013; 153:743.
Busquets J, Martín S, Fabregat J, et al. Randomized trial of two types of gastrojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy and risk of delayed gastric emptying (PAUDA trial). Br J Surg 2019; 106:46.
Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Soper NJ. Evolution and current status of the Whipple procedure: an update for gastroenterologists. Gastroenterology 1997; 113:983.
Tsalis K, Antoniou N, Koukouritaki Z, et al. Successful treatment of recurrent cholangitis by constructing a hepaticojejunostomy with long Roux-en-Y limb in a long-term surviving patient after a Whipple procedure for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Case Rep 2014; 15:348.
Spiliotis J, Karnabatidis D, Vaxevanidou A, et al. Acute cholangitis due to afferent loop syndrome after a Whipple procedure: a case report. Cases J 2009; 2:6339.
Eshuis WJ, van Eijck CH, Gerhards MF, et al. Antecolic versus retrocolic route of the gastroenteric anastomosis after pancreatoduodenectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2014; 259:45.
Tamandl D, Sahora K, Prucker J, et al. Impact of the reconstruction method on delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized study. World J Surg 2014; 38:465.
Hüttner FJ, Klotz R, Ulrich A, et al. Antecolic versus retrocolic reconstruction after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 9:CD011862.
Jilesen AP, van Eijck CH, Busch OR, et al. Postoperative Outcomes of Enucleation and Standard Resections in Patients with a Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor. World J Surg 2016; 40:715.
