Laparoskopik Pankreas Cerrahisi
Özet
Laparoskopik pankreas cerrahisi, açık tekniklere kıyasla daha az kan kaybı, kısa hastanede yatış süresi ve yüksek erken dönem yaşam kalitesi sunan minimal invaziv bir yaklaşımdır. En sık uygulanan prosedür distal pankreatektomi olmakla birlikte, Whipple prosedürü (pankreatikoduodenektomi) ve santral pankreatektomi gibi karmaşık ameliyatlar da giderek artan sıklıkta gerçekleştirilmektedir. Cerrahi endikasyonlar genellikle pankreas maligniteleri, kistik lezyonlar ve pankreatit gibi benign nedenleri kapsar. Ancak, vasküler dokuyu çevreleyen ileri evre tümörler, metastazlar ve ciddi kardiyopulmoner hastalıklar bu cerrahi için kontrendikasyon oluşturmaktadır. Operasyon öncesinde vasküler ve biliyer anatominin radyolojik olarak detaylıca değerlendirilmesi, olası intraoperatif kanama ve komplikasyon risklerini en aza indirmek açısından kritik öneme sahiptir. Ameliyat sırasında hemostaz için gelişmiş enerji cihazları ve klipler kullanılırken, rezeksiyon sınırlarının belirlenmesinde laparoskopik ultrasonografiden faydalanılmaktadır. Çalışmalar, laparoskopik ve açık distal pankreatektominin fistül gelişimi, onkolojik sınır pozitifliği ve uzun dönem sağkalım oranları açısından benzer sonuçlara sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Bununla birlikte, uzun ameliyat süreleri ve ekipman maliyetleri dezavantaj oluştururken, cerrahın laparoskopi deneyimi ve öğrenim eğrisi operasyonun başarısını doğrudan etkilemektedir.
Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery is a minimally invasive approach offering advantages such as reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and higher early-stage quality of life compared to open surgery. While distal pancreatectomy remains the most frequently performed procedure, complex operations like the Whipple procedure (pancreaticoduodenectomy) and central pancreatectomy are increasingly utilized. Surgical indications primarily include pancreatic malignancies, cystic lesions, and benign conditions like pancreatitis. Conversely, advanced tumors with vascular involvement, distant metastases, and severe cardiopulmonary diseases act as contraindications. Thorough preoperative radiological evaluations of vascular and biliary anatomy are essential to mitigate intraoperative bleeding and complication risks. Advanced energy devices and clips are utilized for intraoperative hemostasis, and laparoscopic ultrasonography is routinely employed to identify tumor margins and resection boundaries. Studies indicate that laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomies yield comparable outcomes regarding fistula formation, oncological margin positivity, and long-term survival. However, extended operative times and high equipment expenses present notable drawbacks, with the surgeon's laparoscopic experience and learning curve directly influencing overall operative success.
Referanslar
Chan KS, Wang ZK, Syn N, et al. Learning curve of laparoscopic and robotic pancreas resections: a systematic review. Surgery (United States). Elsevier Inc.; 2021;170(1): 194–206. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2020.11.046
Lee S, Varghese C, Oh A, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of cost-effectiveness and quality of life following minimally invasive versus open major pancreatic resections. Hpb. 2021;23: S840. doi:10.1016/j.hpb.2021.08.356
Nguyen TK, Zenati MS, Boone BA, et al. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy in the presence of aberrant or anomalous hepatic arterial anatomy: Safety and oncologic outcomes. Hpb. 2015;17(7): 594–599. doi:10.1111/hpb.12414
Małczak P, Sierżęga M, Stefura T, et al. Arterial resections in pancreatic cancer – Systematic review and meta-analysis. Hpb. 2020;22(7): 961–968. doi:10.1016/j.hpb.2020.04.005
Belfiori G, Fiorentini G, Tamburrino D, et al. Vascular resection during pancreatectomy for pancreatic head cancer: A technical issue or a prognostic sign? Surgery (United States). 2021;169(2): 403–410. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2020.08.002
Nassour I, Paniccia A, Moser AJ, et al. Minimally Invasive Techniques for Pancreatic Resection. Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America. 2021;30(4): 747–758. doi:10.1016/j.soc.2021.06.007
Cheng K, Liu W, You J, et al. Safety of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with liver cirrhosis using propensity score matching. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(1 January): 1–13. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0246364
D’Onofrio M, Vecchiato F, Faccioli N, et al. Ultrasonography of the pancreas. 7. Intraoperative imaging. Abdominal Imaging. 2007;32(2): 200–206. doi:10.1007/s00261-006-9018-y
Bensley RP, Schermerhorn ML, Hurks R, et al. Risk of late-onset adhesions and incisional hernia repairs after surgery. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2013;216(6): 1–32. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.01.060
Swank HA, Mulder IM, La Chapelle CF, et al. Systematic review of trocar-site hernia. British Journal of Surgery. 2012;99(3): 315–323. doi:10.1002/bjs.7836
Korrel M, Roelofs A, van Hilst J, et al. Long-Term Quality of Life after Minimally Invasive vs Open Distal Pancreatectomy in the LEOPARD Randomized Trial. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2021;233(6): 730-739.e9. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.08.687
Yiannakopoulou E. Minimally invasive pancreatic surgery. [Online]. Eighth Edi. Minerva Chirurgica. Elsevier Inc.; 2015. 437–450 p. doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-40232-3.00101-1
Meng LW, Cai YQ, Li Y Bin, et al. Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy for the Treatment of Nonpancreatic Periampullary Adenocarcinomas. Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques. 2018;28(1): 56–61. doi:10.1097/SLE.0000000000000504
van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Bosscha K, et al. Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy (LEOPARD-2): A multicenter patient-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Pancreatology. Elsevier India, a division of Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd; 2018;18(4): S6–S7. doi:10.1016/j.pan.2018.05.021
Wang M, Peng B, Liu J, et al. Practice patterns and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in china a retrospective multicenter analysis of 1029 patients. Annals of Surgery. 2019;20(20): 145–153. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000003190
