Pankreas Cerrahisinde Yapay Zekanın Yeri
Özet
Pankreas cerrahisinde yapay zeka (YZ), makine öğrenimi ve derin öğrenme teknolojileri; preoperatif, intraoperatif ve postoperatif süreçlerde cerrahlara rehberlik ederek önemli avantajlar sunmaktadır. Pankreas kanserinin derin retroperitoneal konumu ve karmaşık vasküler ilişkileri, iki boyutlu klasik görüntülemelerle erken tanı ve doğru evrelemeyi zorlaştırmaktadır. Üç boyutlu (3D) rekonstrüksiyon, artırılmış gerçeklik (AR) ve artırılmış sanallık (AS) gibi yapay zeka destekli teknolojiler, ameliyat esnasında gerçek zamanlı navigasyon sağlayarak ideal diseksiyon düzlemlerinin belirlenmesine ve onkolojik sınırların güvenle korunmasına yardımcı olur. Bu dijital simülasyonlar sayesinde operasyon süreleri kısalmakta, intraoperatif kanama miktarı azalmakta ve cerrahi süreçlerin güvenliği artmaktadır. Ameliyat sonrasında ise en kritik komplikasyonlardan biri olan postoperatif pankreas fistülü (POPF) riski, makine öğrenimi algoritmaları ve hastaya özgü veri setleri kullanılarak önceden tahmin edilebilmektedir. Bu erken risk analizi, yüksek riskli hastalara drenaj stratejileri veya proflaktik ilaç tedavileri gibi kişiselleştirilmiş yaklaşımların gecikmeden uygulanmasını mümkün kılar. Sonuç olarak yapay zeka entegrasyonu; cerrahi morbidite ve mortaliteyi düşürmekte, postoperatif derlenme ve hastanede kalış sürelerini kısaltmakta, tedavi maliyetlerini azaltmakta ve onkolojik nüks riskini asgariye indirerek hastaların hastalıksız sağ kalım oranlarını iyileştirmektedir.
Artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, and deep learning technologies offer distinct advantages in pancreatic surgery by guiding surgeons through preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative processes. The deep retroperitoneal location of pancreatic cancer and its complex vascular connections make early diagnosis and precise staging difficult with traditional two-dimensional imaging. AI-driven tools such as three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction, augmented reality (AR), and augmented virtuality (AV) provide real-time intraoperative navigation, helping to identify ideal dissection planes and ensure safe oncological margins. These digital simulations reduce operative times, minimize intraoperative blood loss, and enhance overall surgical safety. Postoperatively, the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF)—one of the most life-threatening complications—can be predicted early using machine learning algorithms and patient-specific data sets. This proactive risk assessment allows for the timely execution of personalized interventions, such as tailored drainage strategies or prophylactic medical treatments. Consequently, the integration of AI reduces surgical morbidity and mortality, shortens recovery and hospital stays, lowers healthcare costs, and significantly improves disease-free survival rates by minimizing local oncological recurrence.
Referanslar
Lee KS, Jang JY, Yu YD, et al. Usefulness of artificial intelligence for predicting recurrence following surgery for pancreatic cancer: Retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2021;93:106050. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106050..
Bari H, Wadhwani S, Dasari BVM. Role of artificial intelligence in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2021;27;13(1):7-18. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i1.7.
Akshintala VS, Khashab MA. Artificial intelligence in pancreaticobiliary endoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 ;36(1):25-30. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15343. PMID: 33448514.
Litjens G, Kooi T, Bejnordi BE, et al., A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. Med Image Anal. 2017;42:60–88
Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, E Hinton G, editors. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. The twenty-sixth annual conference on neural information processing systems (NIPS); 2012 Dec 3-8; Nevada, United States. Advances in neural information processing systems 2012: 1097-1105.
Cruz JA, Wishart DS. Applications of machine learning in cancer prediction and prognosis. Cancer Inform. 2007;2:59–77.
Kang JS, Lee C, Song W, et al. Risk prediction for malignant intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: logistic regression versus machine learning. Sci Rep. 2020;18;10(1):20140. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76974-7.
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21442.
McGuigan A, Kelly P, Turkington RC, et al. Pancreatic cancer: A review of clinical diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;21;24(43):4846-4861. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i43.4846.
Barat M, Chassagnon G, Dohan A, et al.,Artificial intelligence: a critical review of current applications in pancreatic imaging. Jpn J Radiol. 2021;39(6):514-523. doi: 10.1007/s11604-021-01098-5.
Kurita Y, Kuwahara T, Hara K, Diagnostic ability of artificial intelligence using deep learning analysis of cyst fluid in differentiating malignant from benign pancreatic cystic lesions. Sci Rep. 2019; 3;9(1):6893. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43314-3.
Liu SL, Li S, Guo YT, et al. Establishment and application of an artificial intelligence diagnosis system for pancreatic cancer with a faster region-based convolutional neural network. Chin Med J (Engl).2019;5;132(23):2795-2803.doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000544.
Miyamoto R, Oshiro Y, Nakayama K, et al. Three-dimensional simulation of pancreatic surgery showing the size and location of the main pancreatic duct. Surg Today. 2017;47:357–364
Fang CH, Kong D, Wang X, et al.Three-dimensional reconstruction of the peripancreatic vascular system based on computed tomographic angiography images and its clinical application in the surgical management of pancreatic tumors. Pancreas. 2014;43:389–395.
Sauer IM, Queisner M, Tang P, et al. Mixed Reality in Visceral Surgery: Development of a Suitable Workflow and Evaluation of Intraoperative Use-cases. Ann Surg. 2017;266:706–712
Igami T, Nakamura Y, Oda M, et al. Application of three-dimensional print in minor hepatectomy following liver partition between anterior and posterior sectors. ANZ J Surg. 2018;88:882–885
Abe Y, Itano O, Kitago M, et al., Computer assisted surgery, preoperative planning and navigation for pancreatic cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014;21:251–255.
Okamoto T, Onda S, Yasuda J, et al., Navigation surgery using an augmented reality for pancreatectomy. Dig Surg. 2015;32:117–123
Nicolau S, Soler L, Mutter D, et al., Augmented reality in laparoscopic surgical oncology. Surg Oncol. 2011;20:189–201
Han IW, Cho K, Ryu Y, et al. Risk prediction platform for pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy using artificial intelligence. World J Gastroenterol. 2020;14;26(30):4453-4464. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i30.4453.
Yokoyama S, Hamada T, Higashi M, et al. Predicted Prognosis of Patients with Pancreatic Cancer by Machine Learning. Clin Cancer Res. 2020; 15;26(10):2411-2421. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-1247
Garg PK, Sharma J, Jakhetiya A, et al. The Role of Prophylactic Octreotide Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy to Prevent Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: A Meta-Analysis of the Randomized Controlled Trials. Surg J (N Y) 2018;4:e182–e187
Callery MP, Pratt WB, Kent TS, et al. A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216:1–1
