Mikrodalga Termoterapinin Temel Prensipleri

Yazarlar

Murat Bozlu
Mesut Tek

Özet

Radyolojik görüntüleme yöntemlerindeki gelişmeler, 4 cm’den küçük rastlantısal küçük renal kitlelerin (KRK) tanı oranını artırmıştır. Bu tümörlerde altın standart tedavi parsiyel nefrektomi olsa da, yüksek komorbidite yükü olan veya cerrahi istemeyen hastalarda mikrodalga termoterapi (MDT) gibi fokal ablatif yöntemler öne çıkmaktadır. MDT, hedef dokuya yerleştirilen antenler aracılığıyla elektromanyetik dalgalar göndererek su moleküllerini hareket ettirir ve sürtünme enerjisiyle 80-100 °C arasında yüksek ısı oluşturur. Radyofrekans ablasyona (RFA) kıyasla ısı üretimi daha hızlı ve güçlü olup, dokunun iletkenliğine bağımlı olmadığından kemik ve akciğer gibi yalıtkan dokularda da etkilidir. Ayrıca, hastanın bacaklarına elektrot yerleştirilmesine gerek duyulmaz ve anten içi soğutma sitemi sayesinde cilt yanığı riski önlenerek daha geniş ablasyon alanı sağlanır. Yapılan klinik ve retrospektif çalışmalar, MDT’nin yüksek teknik başarıya sahip, böbrek fonksiyonlarını koruyan ve düşük nüks oranları sunan güvenli bir alternatif olduğunu doğrulamaktadır. Yöntem, son yıllarda düşük riskli lokalize prostat kanserinin fokal tedavisinde de sağlıklı dokuyu koruyup yan etkileri azaltmak amacıyla umut verici bir alternatif olarak test edilmeye başlanmıştır.

Advances in radiological imaging have increased the detection rate of incidental small renal masses (SRMs) smaller than 4 cm. Although partial nephrectomy is the gold standard for these tumors, focal ablative methods like microwave thermotherapy (MTT) emerge as strong options for elderly patients, those with high comorbidities, or those reluctant to undergo surgery. MTT delivers electromagnetic waves via antennas inserted directly into the target tissue, causing water molecules to oscillate and generate friction energy between 80-100 °C, leading to tissue death. Compared to radiofrequency ablation (RFA), MTT produces heat more rapidly and powerfully, and since it does not rely on electrical conductivity, it remains effective in insulating tissues like bone and lung. Furthermore, it eliminates the need for grounding pads on the patient's legs, and its internal cooling system prevents skin burns while enabling a larger ablation zone. Clinical and retrospective studies demonstrate that MTT is a safe alternative with high technical success, preserved renal function, and low recurrence rates. Recently, this method has also been tested as a promising alternative in the focal treatment of low-risk localized prostate cancer to minimize side effects by preserving healthy tissue.

Referanslar

Zargar H, Atwell TD, Cadeddu JA, de la Rosette JJ, Janetschek G, Kaouk JH et al. Cryoablation for small renal masses: selection criteria, complications, and functional and oncologic results. Eur Urol 2016; 69(1): 116–28.

M. Uchida, Y. Imaide, K. Sugimoto, H. Uehara, and H. Watanabe, “Percutaneous cryosurgery for renal tumours,” British Journal of Urology, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 132–7, 1995.

Nielsen TK, Lagerveld BW, Keeley F, Lughezzani G, Sriprasad S, Barber NJ et al. Oncological outcomes and complication rates after laparoscopic-assisted cryoablation: a European Registry for Renal Cryoablation (EuRECA) multi-institutional study. BJU Int.2017; 119 (3): 90-395.

Zlotta AR, Wildschutz T, Raviv G, et al. Radiofrequency interstitial tumor ablation (RITA) is a possible new modality for treatment of renal cancer: ex vivo and in vivo experience. J Endourol 1997;11(4):251-8

Ramirez D, Ma YB, Bedir S, Antonelli JA, Cadeddu JA, Gahan JC. Laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of small renal tumors:long-term oncologic outcomes. J Endourol 2014; 28(3): 330–4.

Psutka SP, Feldman AS, McDougal WS, McGovern FJ, Mueller P, Gervais DA. Long-term oncologic outcomes after radiofrequency ablation for T1 renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2013; 63(3): 486–92.

Liang P, Wang Y, Zhang D, Yu X, Gao Y, Ni X. Ultrasound guided percutaneous microwave ablation for small renal cancer: initial experience. J Urol. 2008;180(3):844–8.

Brace CL. Radiofrequency and microwave ablation of the liver, lung, kidney, and bone: what are the differences? Curr Probl Diagn Radiol.2009; 38(3): 135–43.

Simon CJ, Dupuy DE, Mayo-Smith WW. Microwave ablation: principles and applications. Radiographics. 2005;25(Suppl 1): S69–S83.

Wang Y, Sun Y, Feng L, Gao Y, Ni X, Liang P. Internally cooled antenna for microwave ablation: results in ex vivo and in vivo porcine livers. Eur J Radiol 2008;67(02):357–61.

Tabuse K. Basic knowledge of a microwave tissue coagulator and its clinical applications. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 1998;5(02): 165–72.

Winokur RS, Du JY, Pua BB, et al. Characterization of in vivo ablation zones following percutaneous microwave ablation of the liver with two commercially available devices: are manufacturer published reference values useful? J Vasc Interv Radiol 2014; 25(12):1939–46.

Campbel- Walsh Urology 10th edition 2014. Böbrek Tümörlerinde ablatif tedaviler. Campbel- Walsh, 10th edition. 2014; (1): 56; 1681.

Arıbal S, Kaya E. Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Microwave Ablation of Small Renal Masses: Short- and Mid-term Results, Safety, Effectiveness, and Prognostic Contributions. Eur Arch Med Res 2020; 36(3): 209-17.

Marki E. Klapperich, E. Jason Abel, Timothy J. Ziemlewicz, et al. Effect of Tumor Complexity and Technique on Efficacy and Complications after Percutaneous Microwave Ablation of Stage T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Center, Retrospective Study. Radiology. July 2017; 284(1): 272–80.

Guan W, Bai J, Liu J, et al. Microwave ablation versus partial nephrectomy for small renal tumors: intermediate-term results. J Surg Oncol 2012; 106(3): 316–32.

Lin Y, Liang P, Yu XL, et al. Percutaneous microwave ablation of renal cell carcinoma is safe in patients with a solitary kidney. Urology. 2014; 83(2): 357–63.

Yu J, Zhang G, Liang P, et al. Midterm results of percutaneous microwave ablation under ultrasound guidance versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radial nephrectomy for small renal cell carcinoma. Abdom Imaging 2015; 40(8): 3248–56.

Future perspective of focal therapy for localized prostate cancer. Luke P, O’Connor, Ramedani S. et al. Asian J of Urology, 2021; 8: 354-61.

Hofman RM, Monga M, Elliot SP, et al. Microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Cohrane Database Syst Rew 2012: Cd004135.

Phase I study of cancer lesion-targeted microwave coagulation therapy for localized prostate cancer: A pilot clinical study protocol. Yamada Y, Shiaishi T, Ueno A, et al. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019; 16: 100471.

Gelecek

15 Ağustos 2022

Lisans

Lisans