Yaşlanan Yüz ve Boyun İçin Kozmetik Cerrahi
Özet
Nüfusun yaşlanması ve estetik beklentilerin artması, yüz gençleştirme prosedürlerine olan talebi her geçen gün artırmaktadır. Yaşlanma süreci; kemik, kas, bağ dokusu ve cilt seviyesinde meydana gelen yapısal deformasyonlarla kendini göstermektedir. Bu süreçte hücresel düzeyde kolajen ve elastin üretimi azalırken, yüzün derin yağ yastıkçıklarında atrofi, yüzeysel katmanlarında ise pitoz yani sarkmalar meydana gelir. Yaşlanan yüz ve boyun anatomisini restore etmek amacıyla uygulanan kozmetik cerrahi yöntemlerinin başında yüz germe (ritidektomi) operasyonları gelmektedir. Yüz germe cerrahisi, tarihsel süreçte basit cilt eksizyonlarından başlayarak günümüzde derin doku manipülasyonlarına kadar uzanan geniş bir teknik çeşitliliğe evrilmiştir. Bu teknikler arasında Klasik Deri Altı Yüz Germe, SMAS Plikasyonu, Minimum Erişimli Kraniyal Süspansiyon Germe (MACS Lift), Derin Plan Yüz Germe, Genişletilmiş SMAS Germe, Lateral SMASektomi, Kompozit Yüz Germe ve Subperiostal Yüz Germe yer almaktadır. Her cerrahi yöntemin diseksiyon düzlemi, etki süresi, skar boyutu ve fasiyal sinir yaralanma riski gibi kendine özgü avantaj ve dezavantajları bulunmaktadır. Cerrahın en büyük zorluğu; hastanın cilt yapısı, anatomik deformasyonları, beklentileri, iyileşme süresi ve ekonomik durumu gibi bireysel faktörleri değerlendirerek en doğru kişiselleştirilmiş tekniği seçmektir.
The aging population and increasing aesthetic expectations drive the demand for facial rejuvenation procedures. The aging process manifests through structural deformations in bones, muscles, connective tissues, and skin. At the cellular level, collagen and elastin production decreases, leading to the atrophy of deep facial fat pads and the ptosis of superficial layers. Facelift (rhytidectomy) operations are primary cosmetic surgery methods used to restore the aging face and neck anatomy. Historically evolving from simple skin excisions, facelift surgery now includes advanced deep tissue manipulations. These techniques comprise Classical Subcutaneous Facelift, SMAS Plication, Minimal Access Cranial Suspension Lift (MACS Lift), Deep Plane Facelift, Extended SMAS Lift, Lateral SMASectomy, Composite Facelift, and Subperiosteal Facelift. Each surgical method possesses distinct advantages and disadvantages regarding dissection planes, duration of effect, scar size, and facial nerve injury risks. The primary challenge for surgeons is selecting the most accurate personalized technique by evaluating individual factors, including the patient's skin condition, anatomical deformations, expectations, recovery time, and economic status.
Referanslar
Garn SM, Rohmann CG, Wagner B, Ascoli, W. Continuing bone growth throughout life: a general phenomenon. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 1967;26(3):313-317.
Bartlett SP, Grossman R, Whitaker LA. Age-related changes of the craniofacial skeleton: an anthropometric and histologic analysis. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 1992;90(4):592-600.
Mendelson B, Wong CH. Changes in the Facial Skeleton With Aging: Implications and Clinical Applications in Facial Rejuvenation. Aesth Plast Surg. 2020;44:1151-1158.
Mathes S, Hentz VR. (2006). Pediatric plastic surgery. Mathes SJ(Ed.).Plastic Surgery. (pp.3085-3654). Philadelphia: Elsevier.
Rogers BO. The development of aesthetic plastic surgery: a history. In The creation of aesthetic plastic surgery. 1976;1-22.
Little JW. Three-dimensional rejuvenation of the midface: volumetric resculpture by malar imbrication. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2000; 105(1):267-285.
Gavrilov LA, Gavrilova NS. The reliability theory of aging and longevity. Journal of theoretical Biology. 2001;213(4):527-545.
Bereiter-Hahn J. Mitochondrial dynamics in aging and disease. Progress in molecular biology and translational science. 2014;127:93-131.
Yokozawa T, Satoh A, Cho EJ. Ginsenoside‐Rd attenuates oxidative damage related to aging in senescence‐accelerated mice. Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology. 2004;56(1):107-113.
Gosain AK, Klein MH, Sudhakar PV, Prost RW. A volumetric analysis of soft-tissue changes in the aging midface using high-resolution MRI: implications for facial rejuvenation. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2005;115(4):1143-1152.
Montagna W, Carlisle K. Structural changes in ageing skin. British Journal of Dermatology. 1990;122:61-70.
Mendelson BC, Jacobson SR. Surgical anatomy of the midcheek: facial layers, spaces, and the midcheek segments. Clinics in plastic surgery. 2008;35(3):395-404.
Rohrich RJ, Pessa JE. The fat compartments of the face: anatomy and clinical implications for cosmetic surgery. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2007;119(7):2219-2227.
Ghassemi A, Prescher A, Riediger D, Axer H. Anatomy of the SMAS revisited. Aesthetic plastic surgery. 2003;27(4):258-264.
Moss CJ, Mendelson BC, Taylor GI. Surgical anatomy of the ligamentous attachments in the temple and periorbital regions. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2000;105(4):1475-1490.
Muzaffar AR, Mendelson BC, Adams Jr WP. Surgical anatomy of the ligamentous attachments of the lower lid and lateral canthus. In Presented at the Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2001;(Vol. 873).
Pourdanesh F, Esmaeelinejad M, Jafari SM, Nematollahi Z. (2016). Facelift: current concepts, techniques, and principles. Motamedi MHK (Ed.). A Textbook of Advanced Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (pp.653-674). London. IntechOpen.
Mang W, Verlag ÄGS, Neumann H, Einhorn‐Presse G. (2010). Rhytidectomy. Mang W (Ed.). Facial plastic surgery (pp.65-164). Munich:Springer.
Martén E, Langevin CJ, Kaswan S, Zins JE. The safety of rhytidectomy in the elderly. Plastic and reconstructive surger. 2011;127(6):2455-2463.
Ellenbogen R. A 15-year follow-up study of the non-SMAS skin-tightening facelift with midface defatting: Equal or better than deeper plane procedures in result, duration, safety, and patient satisfaction. Clinics in plastic surgery. 1997;24(2):247-267.
Gamble WB, Manson PN, Smith GE, Hamra ST. Comparison of skin-tissue tensions using the composite and the subcutaneous rhytidectomy techniques. Annals of plastic surgery. 1995;35(5):447-453.
Kim BJ, Choi JH, Lee Y. Development of facial rejuvenation procedures: thirty years of clinical experience with face lifts. Archives of plastic surgery. 2015;42(5):521-529.
Skoog T. Rhytidectomy: a personal experience and technique. In The Seventh Annual Symposium on Cosmetic Surgery at Cedars of Lebanon Hospital. 1973.
Becker FF, Bassichis BA. Deep-Plane Face-lift vs Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System Plication Face-lift. Archives of facial plastic surgery. 2004;6;8-13.
Mohammadi S, Ahmadi A, Salem MM, Safdarian M, Ilkhani S. A comparison between two methods of face-lift surgery in nine cadavers: SMAS (superficial musculo-aponeurotic system) versus MACS (minimal access cranial suspension). Aesthetic plastic surgery. 2015;39(5):680-685.
Verpaele A, Tonnard P, Gaia S, Guerao FP, Pirayesh A. The third suture in MACS-lifting: making midface-lifting simple and safe. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2007;60(12):1287-1295.
Tonnard PL, Verpaele A, Gaia S. Optimising results from minimal access cranial suspension lifting (MACS-lift). Aesthetic plastic surgery. 2005;29(4):213-220.
Mast BA. Advantages and limitations of the MACS lift for facial rejuvenation. Annals of plastic surgery. 2014;72(6):139-143.
Gordon NA, Adam SI. Deep plane face lifting for midface rejuvenation. Clinics in plastic surgery. 2015;42(1):129-142.
Marcus BC. Rhytidectomy: current concepts, controversies and the state of the art. Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery. 2012;20(4):262-266.
Baker TJ, Stuzin JM. Personal technique of face lifting. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 1997;100(2):502-508.
Baker DC. Lateral SMASectomy. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 1997;100(2):509-513.
Hamra ST. Composite rhytidectomy: Finesse and refinements in technique. Clinics in plastic surgery. 1997;24(2):337-346.
Ramirez OM, Daniel RK. Endoscopic plastic surgery. Springer Science & Business Media.1996.
