Yara Tedavisinde Kullanılan Aktif Kapama Yöntemleri
Özet
Yara bakımında geleneksel yöntemlere yanıt vermeyen durumlar için geliştirilen aktif yara kapama yöntemleri, doku onarımında büyük bir yenilik oluşturmaktadır. Cilt veya mukoza bütünlüğünün bozulması olarak tanımlanan yaralar, iyileşme sürelerine göre akut ve kronik olarak sınıflandırılır. Yara Bakımı ve Onarımı Derneği tarafından kabul gören aktif kapama yöntemleri; Negatif Basınçlı Yara Tedavisi (NBYT), Hiperbarik Oksijen (HBO), Topikal Oksijen, Elektrik Stimülasyonu, Jet-Lavaj İrrigasyon Sistemi, Işın, Ozon, Lazer, Kök Hücre ve Ultrason Tedavisi gibi uygulamaları kapsar. Bu yenilikçi sistemler; ödemi azaltmayı, kan akışını ve doku oksijenlenmesini artırmayı, bakteri yükünü düşürerek granülasyon dokusu oluşumunu hızlandırmayı amaçlar. Özellikle diyabetik ayak ülserleri, üçüncü ve dördüncü evre basınç yaraları, nekrotizan enfeksiyonlar ile travmatik yaralanmalarda amputasyon riskini ve hastanede yatış süresini azalttıkları klinik araştırmalarla kanıtlanmıştır. Her yöntemin kendine özgü endikasyon, kontrendikasyon ve mekanizmaları bulunmakta olup, klinik başarı sağlanması için hasta ve yara durumunun sağlık personeli tarafından ayrıntılı değerlendirilmesi kritik önem taşımaktadır.
Active wound closure methods, developed for situations that do not respond to conventional wound care, represent a major innovation in tissue repair. Wounds, defined as the disruption of skin or mucosal integrity, are classified as acute or chronic based on their healing duration. The active closure methods accepted by the Wound Care and Repair Association include applications such as Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT), Hyperbaric Oxygen (HBO), Topical Oxygen, Electrical Stimulation, Jet-Lavage Irrigation, Light, Ozone, Laser, Stem Cell, and Ultrasound Therapy. These innovative systems aim to reduce edema, increase blood flow and tissue oxygenation, and accelerate granulation tissue formation by decreasing bacterial load. Clinical research proves they reduce amputation risks and hospitalization times, particularly in diabetic foot ulcers, stage three and four pressure injuries, necrotizing infections, and traumatic wounds. Each method has specific indications, contraindications, and mechanisms; therefore, a detailed assessment of the patient and wound status by healthcare professionals is critical to achieving clinical success.
Referanslar
Dhivya S, Padma VV, Santhini E. Wound dressings–a review. BioMedicine, 2015; 5(4),1-5. doi: 10.7603/s40681-015-0022-9
Mirasoğlu B. Yara bakım ürünleri. TOTBİD Dergisi, 2015;14,456-461. doi: 10.14292/totbid. dergisi.2015.66
Yara Bakımı Derneği. TYBÜKS (Türk Yara Bakım Ürünleri Kodlama Sistemi). (03/02/2022 tarihinde http://yarabakimidernegi.org.tr/sayfa-tybUks-turk-yara-bakim-Urunleri-kodlama-sistemi-65.html adresinden ulaşılmıştır.
Bak JR. Wound Healing, Dressings, and Drains. In: Rothroch JC (ed.) Alexander’s Care of the Patients in Surgery. 16th ed. Missouri: Elsevier; 2019. p. 802-851.
Ather S, Harding KG. Wound Management and Dressings. In: Rajendran S (ed.) Advanced Textiles for Wound Care. 2nd ed. United Kingdom: Elsevier; 2019. p. 1-22.
Gestring M. Negative pressure wound therapy. Available from: https://e1c9b1a9cc9b2679354d789c7627a4c889c411cc.vetisonline.com/contents/negative-pressure-wound-therapy?search=negative%20pressure&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1~150&usage_type=default&display_rank=1(Accessed 3rd February 2022).
Huang C, Leavitt T, Bayer LR, et al. Effect of negative pressure wound therapy on wound healing. Current Problems in Surgery, 2014; 51(7), 301-331. doi: 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2014.04.001
Gibbs KA, Hamm RL. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. In: Hamm RL (ed). Text and Atlas of Wound Diagnosis and Treatment. United States: Mc GrawHill Education; 2015. p. 401-422.
Niezgoda J, Baranoski S, Ayello EA, et al. Wound Treatment Options. In: Baranoski S, Ayello E (eds.). Wound Care Essentials Practice Principle. 5th ed. China: Wolters Kluwer; 2020. p. 538-685.
Salvo P, Smajda R, Dini V, et al. A D-optimal design to model the performances of dressings and devices for negative pressure wound therapy. Journal of Tissue Viability, 2016; 25(2), 83-90.
Agarwal P, Kukrele R, Sharma D. Vacuum assisted closure (VAC)/negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for difficult wounds: A review. Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2019;10(5), 845-848.
Öğce F. Yara İyileşmesi, Pansumanlar, Drenler. Yavuz van Giersbergen M, Kaymakçı Ş (eds.) Ameliyathane Hemşireliği içinde. İzmir: Meta; 2015. p. 547-566.
Vachhrajani V, Khakhkhar P. Science of Wound Healing and Dressing Materials. Singapore: Springer; 2020.
European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance. Basınç Ülserlerinin/Yaralarının Önlenmesi ve Tedavisi: Hızlı Başvuru Kılavuzu 2019. (Türkçe versiyon). Emily Haesler (Ed.). EPUAP/NPIAP/PPPIA: 2019.
Food and Drug Administration-FDA. Non-powered Suction Apparatus Device Intended for Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT)-Class II Special Controls Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/guidance-documents-medical-devices-and-radiation-emitting-products/non-powered-suction-apparatus-device-intended-negative-pressure-wound-therapy-npwt-class-ii-special#5 (Accessed 3rd February 2022).
Sahebally SM, McKevitt K, Stephens I, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy for closed laparotomy incisions in general and colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA surgery, 2018;153(11), e183467-e183467. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3467
Liu Z, Dumville JC, Hinchliffe RJ, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2018; (10),1-69. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010318.pub3
Norman G, Goh EL, Dumville JC, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2020;(6),1-208. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261.pub6.
Tuuli MG, Liu J, Tita AT, et al. Effect of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy vs standard wound dressing on surgical-site infection in obese women after cesarean delivery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 2020;324(12),1180-1189. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.13361
Marston WA, Sabolinski ML, Parsons, NB, et al. Comparative effectiveness of a bilayered living cellular construct and a porcine collagen wound dressing in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Wound Repair and Regeneration, 2014;22(3),334-340. doi:10.1111/wrr.12156
Aktaş Ş.KronikYaradaLokalFaktörler veYardımcıTedaviler.ANKEM Dergisi,2012;26(2),217-222.
Vural F, Savcı A. Yara Bakımında Yeni Uygulamalar. Türkiye Klinikleri J Surg Nurs-Special Topics, 2017; 3(3), 224-232.
Zhao D, Luo S, Xu W, et al. Efficacy and safety of hyperbaric oxygen therapy used in patients with diabetic foot: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Clinical therapeutics, 2017;39(10), 2088-2094. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.08.014
Kranke P, Bennett MH, Martyn‐St James M, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for chronic wounds. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2015;(6),1-53. doi:10.1002/14651858. CD004123.pub4.
Brouwer RJ, Lalieu RC, Hoencamp R, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of hyperbaric oxygen therapy for diabetic foot ulcers with arterial insufficiency. Journal of vascular surgery, 2020;71(2), 682-692. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.07.082
Sharma R, Sharma SK, Mudgal SK, et al. Efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy for diabetic foot ulcer, a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Scientific reports, 2021;11(1), 1-12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81886-1
Zhang Z, Zhang W, Xu Y, et al. Efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy for diabetic foot ulcers: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian Journal of Surgery, 2022; 45(1), 68-78. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.07.047
Wang F, Wang Y, Sun T, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for the treatment of traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis. Neurological Sciences, 2016;37(5),693-701. doi: 10.1007/ s10072-015-2460-2
Erdoğan B. Yara Bakım Ürünleri. Topalan M, Aktaş Ş (eds.) Güncel Yönleriyle Kronik Yara içinde. Ankara: Aygül Ofset; 2010. p. 141-171.
Nataraj M, Maiya AG, Karkada G, et al. Application of topical oxygen therapy in healing dynamics of diabetic foot ulcers-a systematic review. Review of Diabetic Studies, 2019;15(1), 74-82. doi: 10.1900/RDS.2019.15.74
Thanigaimani S, Singh T, Golledge J. Topical oxygen therapy for diabetes‐related foot ulcers: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Diabetic Medicine, 2021;38(8),1-10. doi: 10.1111/dme.14585
Sümen SG. Kronik yara ve topikal oksijen tedavisi. Uncu H (ed.) Yara. 1. Baskı. Ankara: Türkiye Klinikleri; 2021. p.192-8.
Rajendran SB, Challen K, Wright KL, et al. Electrical stimulation to enhance wound healing. Journal of Functional Biomaterials, 2021;12(2),40.
Thakral G, LaFontaine J, Najafi B, et al. Electrical stimulation to accelerate wound healing. Diabetic foot & ankle, 2013;4(1),1-9. doi: 10.3402/dfa.v4i0.22081
Ho CH, Bensitel T, Wang X, et al. Pulsatile lavage for the enhancement of pressure ulcer healing: a randomized controlled trial. Physical Therapy, 2012;92(1),38-48.
Bath MF, Powell J, Ismail I, et al. Use of pulsed lavage reduces the rate of surgical site infection after laparotomy. Journal of Surgical Research, 2021;266, 300-305.
Aktaş Ş. Yara Bakım Ürünleri. (03/02/2022 tarihinde https://www.klimik.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/YARA-BAKIM-ÜRÜNLERİ-ŞAMİL-AKTAS.pdf adresinden ulaşılmıştır.)
Fitzpatrick E, Holland OJ, Vanderlelie JJ. Ozone therapy for the treatment of chronic wounds: A systematic review. International wound journal, 2018;15(4), 633-644. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12907
Wainstein J, Feldbrin ZE, Boaz M, et al. Efficacy of ozone–oxygen therapy for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2011;13(12), 1255-1260.
Zhang J, Guan M, Xie C, et al. Increased growth factorsplay a role in wound healing promoted by noninvasive oxygen-ozone therapyin diabetic patients with foot ulcers. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, 2014;1-8.
Kazemikhoo N, Rahbar MR, Akrami SM. Low-level laser therapy along with intravascular laser in deep pressure ulcer resistant to conventional therapies. Journal of Skin and Stem Cell, 2015; 2(4),1-4. doi: 10.17795/jssc30686
Taradaj J, Shay B, Dymarek R, et al. Effect of laser therapy on expression of angio-and fibrogenic factors, and cytokine concentrations during the healing process of human pressure ulcers. International journal of medical sciences, 2018; 15(11), 1105-1112. doi: 10.7150/ijms.25651
Ding DC, Shyu WC, Lin SZ. Mesenchymal stem cells. Cell transplantation, 2011;20(1), 5-14. doi: 10.3727/096368910X
Mutlu S, Yılmaz E. Yara Yönetiminde Yenilikçi Yaklaşımlar. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 2019; 8(4), 481-494.
Jackson WM, Nesti LJ, Tuan RS. Concise review: clinical translation of wound healing therapies based on mesenchymal stem cells. Stem cells translational medicine, 2012;1(1), 44-50. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2011-0024.
Akyolcu N. Yara İyileşmesi ve Hemşirelik. Aksoy G, Kanan N, Akyolcu N (eds.) Cerrahi Hemşireliği içinde. Genişletilmiş 2. Baskı. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp. 2017. p. 79-113.
Dhillon RS, Schwarz EM, Maloney MD. Platelet-rich plasma therapy-future or trend?. Arthritis research & therapy, 2012; 14(4), 1-10. doi: 10.1186/ar3914.
Carter MJ, Fylling CP, Parnell L. Use of Platelet Rich Plasma Gel on Wound Healing: A Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis. Eplasty, 2022;11, 382-410.
Zapata MJ, Carvajal AJM, Sola I, et al. Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma for Treating Chronic Wounds. Cochrane Database Systematic Review, 2016; 25(5), 1-58. doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD006899.pub3.
Sherman RA. Maggot therapy takes us back to the future of wound care: new and improved maggot therapy for the 21st century. Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2009; 3(2), 336-344.
Dholaria S, Dalal P, Shah N, et al. Maggots debridement therapy [MDT]. Gujarat Medical Journal, 2014;69(1), 32-36.
Armstrong D. Basic principles of wound management. Available from: https://e1c9b1a9cc9b2679354d789c7627a4c889c411cc.vetisonline.com/contents/basic-principles-of-wound-management?search=maggot%20therapy&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1~3&usage_type=default&display_rank=1 (Accessed 3rd February 2022).
Nigam Y, Morgan C. Does maggot therapy promote wound healing? The clinical and cellular evidence. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 2016; 30(5), 776-782. doi: 10.1111/jdv.13534
ElraiyahT,DomecqJP,PrutskyG,etal.Asystematic review and meta-analysisofdébridement methods for chronic diabetic foot ulcers. Journal of vascular surgery, 2016;63(2),37S-45S.
Opletalová K, Blaizot X, Mourgeon B, et al. Maggot therapy for wound debridement: a randomized multicenter trial. Archives of dermatology, 2012;148(4), 432-438. doi:10.1001/ archdermatol.2011.1895
Ennis WJ, Lee C, Gellada K, et al. Advanced technologies to improve wound healing: Electrical stimulation, vibration therapy, and ultrasound—what is the evidence?. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2016;138(3S),94S-104S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002680
