Özofagus Perforasyonunda Tanı ve Tedavi Yaklaşımı
Özet
Özofagus perforasyonları, nadir görülmesine rağmen yüksek mortalite ve morbidite oranlarıyla seyreden, hayatı tehdit eden ciddi tıbbi acillerdendir. Dış tabakasında seroza bulunmayan özofagus, yırtılmalara karşı oldukça hassastır; günümüzde endoskopik girişimlerin artmasıyla vakaların %60’ı iyatrojenik nedenlerden kaynaklanmaktadır. En sık torasik bölgede görülen bu yaralanmalarda, semptomlar genellikle göğüs ağrısı, yutma güçlüğü ve solunum sıkıntısı şeklinde ortaya çıkar ve ilk 24 saat içinde tanı konulması hayati önem taşır; zira gecikmeler sepsis ve çoklu organ yetmezliği riskini iki katına çıkarmaktadır. Tanıda fizik muayenenin ardından kontrastlı özofagografi, bilgisayarlı tomografi ve endoskopi gibi multidisipliner yöntemlerden yararlanılır. Tedavi yaklaşımında ilk olarak oral alımın kapatılması, geniş spektrumlu IV antibiyotik ve hidrasyon desteği sağlanır. Cerrahi yönetimde, 24 saati geçmiş vakalarda bile vaskülarize kas flepleriyle desteklenen primer onarım optimal seçenek olmaya devam ederken, cerrahiyi tolere edemeyen veya yaygın nekrozu olan hastalarda diversiyon, sadece drenaj veya stent, klips ve vakum gibi güncel endoskopik minimal invaziv yöntemler uygulanmaktadır. Son yıllarda, hastanın stabil olduğu ve kontaminasyonun az olduğu seçilmiş iyatrojenik vakalarda nonoperatif takip oranları da başarıyla artış göstermektedir.
Esophageal perforations are life-threatening medical emergencies characterized by high mortality and morbidity rates, despite being rare. The esophagus, lacking an outer serosal layer, is highly susceptible to tearing, and with the widespread use of endoscopy, approximately 60% of cases currently stem from iatrogenic causes. Most frequently occurring in the thoracic region, symptoms typically present as chest pain, dysphagia, and respiratory distress, making diagnosis within the first 24 hours critical since delays double the risk of sepsis and multiorgan failure. Following a physical examination, diagnosis relies on a multidisciplinary approach utilizing contrast esophagography, computed tomography, and endoscopy. Initial management requires halting oral intake, initiating broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics, and providing hydration support. In surgical management, primary repair reinforced with vascularized muscle flaps remains the optimal choice even in cases delayed beyond 24 hours; however, for patients unable to tolerate major surgery or presenting with extensive necrosis, diversion, isolated drainage, or modern minimally invasive endoscopic interventions such as stents, clips, and vacuum therapy are utilized. In recent years, nonoperative management has also successfully increased in carefully selected iatrogenic cases where the patient remains stable with minimal contamination.
Referanslar
Oesophagus, Barrett NR. Spontaneous perforation of the, 1946, review of the literature and report of three new cases. Thorax. ve 1:48-70.
Schipper JP, Pull ter Gunne AF, Oostvogel HJ, van Laarhoven CJ. Spontaneous rupture of the oesophagus: Boerhaave's syndrome in 2008. Literature review and treatment algorithm. Dig Surg 2009 ve 26:1.
Sepesi B, Raymond DP, Peters JH. Esophageal perforation: surgi- cal, endoscopic and medical management strategies. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2010 ve 26:379-383.
Fadoo F, Ruiz DE, Dawn SK, et al. Helical CT esophagography for the evaluation of suspected esophageal perforation or rupture. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 ve 182:1177-1179.
White CS, Templeton PA, Attar S. Esophageal perforation: CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993 ve 160:767-770.
Curci JJ, Horman MJ. Boerhaave's syndrome: The importance of early diagnosis and treatment. Ann Surg 1976 ve 183:401.
Shaker H, Elsayed H, Whittle I, et al. The influence of the 'golden 24-h rule' on the prognosis of oesophageal perforation in the modern era. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010 ve 38:216.
Brinster CJ, Singhal S, Lee L, et al. Evolving options in the management of esophageal perforation. Ann Thorac Surg 2004 ve 77:1475.
Raymond DP, Watson TJ. Esophageal diversion. Operative Techniques in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2008 ve 13:138.
Mirilas P, Skandalakis JE. Benign anatomical mistakes: right and left coronary ligaments. Am Surg 2002 ve 68:832.
Fürst H, Hartl WH, Löhe F, Schildberg FW. Colon interposition for esophageal replacement: an alternative technique based on the use of the right colon. Ann Surg 2000 ve 231:173.
Barkley C, Orringer MB, Iannettoni MD, Yee J. Challenges in reversing esophageal discontinuity operations. Ann Thorac Surg 2003 ve 76:989.
Thomas P, Fuentes P, Giudicelli R, Reboud E. Colon interposition for esophageal replacement: current indications and long-term function. Ann Thorac Surg 1997 ve 64:757.
Freeman RK, Herrera A, Ascioti AJ, et al. A propensity-matched comparison of cost and outcomes after esophageal stent placement or primary surgical repair for iatrogenic esophageal perforation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015 ve 149:1550.
Sharma P, Kozarek R, Practice Parameters Committee of American College of Gastroenterology. Role of esophageal stents in benign and malignant diseases. Am J Gastroenterol 2010 ve 105:258.
Freeman RK, Ascioti AJ, Giannini T, Mahidhara RJ. Analysis of unsuccessful esophageal stent placements for esophageal perforation, fistula, or anastomotic leak. Ann Thorac Surg 2012 ve 94:959.
Boumitri C, Kumta NA, Patel M, Kahaleh M. Closing perforations and postperforation management in endoscopy: duodenal, biliary, and colorectal. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2015 ve 25:47.
de Moura DTH, de Moura BFBH, Manfredi MA, et al. Role of endoscopic vacuum therapy in the management of gastrointestinal transmural defects. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2019 ve 11:329.
Salo JA, Isolauri JO, Heikkilä LJ, et al. Management of delayed esophageal perforation with mediastinal sepsis. Esophagectomy or primary repair? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993 ve 106:1088.
Jones WG 2nd, Ginsberg RJ. Esophageal perforation: a continuing challenge. Ann Thorac Surg 1992 ve 53:534.
Port JL, Kent MS, Korst RJ, et al. Thoracic esophageal perforations: a decade of experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2003 ve 75:1071.
Kim-Deobald J, Kozarek RA. Esophageal perforation: an 8-year review of a multispecialty clinic's experience. Am J Gastroenterol 1992 ve 87:1112.
Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2012 ve 2013(41):580-637.
