Onkoplastik Meme Koruyucu Cerrahi
Özet
Onkoplastik meme koruyucu cerrahi (OMKC), meme kanseri tedavisinde onkolojik güvenliği sağlarken estetik sonuçları optimize eden inovatif bir yaklaşımdır. Geleneksel meme koruyucu cerrahide geniş doku rezeksiyonları sonrası oluşan asimetri ve deformite gibi sorunları azaltmak amacıyla plastik cerrahi tekniklerini lumpektomi ile eş zamanlı olarak entegre eder. Multidisipliner bir değerlendirme gerektiren bu yöntem; tümörün evresi, hastanın vücut kitle indeksi, sigara alışkanlığı ve meme volümü gibi faktörler titizlikle incelenerek planlanır. Temel olarak hacim yer değiştirme (kalan dokunun yeniden dağıtılması) ve dışarıdan doku transferi sağlayan hacim doldurma teknikleri olmak üzere iki ana kategoride uygulanır. Literatür verileri, OMKC'nin konvansiyonel yöntemlere kıyasla cerrahi sınır pozitifliği oranlarını azalttığını ve mastektomi gereksinimini önemli ölçüde düşürdüğünü göstermektedir. Ameliyat süresinin uzamasına bağlı olarak hematom, seroma veya flep nekrozu gibi minör ve majör komplikasyon riskleri biraz artsa da bu durum adjuvan kemoterapi veya radyoterapi süreçlerinde gecikmeye yol açmaz. Ayrıca yapılan uzun dönemli sağkalım analizleri, bu yöntemin onkolojik güvenliğinin mastektomi ile eşdeğer olduğunu kanıtlamaktadır. Sonuç olarak OMKC, hastaların vücut imajını koruyarak psikososyal iyilik hallerini ve yaşam kalitelerini belirgin şekilde yükselten, cerrahlara da geniş rezeksiyon esnekliği sunan modern bir cerrahi standarttır.
Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OBCS) is an innovative approach in breast cancer treatment that optimizes aesthetic outcomes while maintaining oncological safety. It integrates plastic surgery techniques simultaneously with lumpectomy to reduce complications like asymmetry and deformity that often occur after extensive tissue resections in conventional surgery. Requiring a multidisciplinary evaluation, this method is planned by carefully analyzing tumor stage, patient body mass index, smoking habits, and breast volume. It is performed under two main categories: volume displacement, which redistributes the remaining breast tissue, and volume replacement, which transfers tissue from external donor sites. Literature shows that OBCS decreases positive surgical margin rates and significantly reduces the necessity for total mastectomy compared to traditional methods. Although minor and major complication risks such as hematoma, seroma, or flap necrosis slightly increase due to prolonged operative times, these issues do not cause delays in adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Furthermore, long-term survival analyses confirm that the oncological safety of this technique is completely equivalent to conventional mastectomy. Consequently, OBCS stands as a modern surgical standard that preserves body image, significantly improves psychosocial well-being and quality of life for patients, and provides surgeons with substantial resection flexibility.
Referanslar
Emiroğlu M, Inal A, Sert I, Ilhan E, Peker K, Gülçelik MA, Güngör H, Salimoğlu S, Can D, Ellidokuz H, Aydın C. How do surgeons approach breast cancer surgery in Turkey? A national survey. Breast Cancer. 2013 Oct 13; [Epub ahead of print] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM Int J Cancer. 2010 Dec 15; 127(12):2893-917.
Veronesi U, Banfi A, Salvadori B, Luini A, Saccozzi R, Zucali R, Marubini E, Del Vecchio M, Boracchi P, Marchini S, et al. Breast conservation is the treatment of choice in small breast cancer: long-term results of a randomized trial. Eur J Cancer. 1990;26:668–670. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0277-5379%2890%2990113-8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar].
Emiroğlu M, Sert I, Inal A. The role of oncoplastic breast surgery in breast cancer treatment. J Breast Health. 2015;11:1–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar
Gulcelik MA, Dogan L, Camlibel M, Karaman N, Kuru B, Alagol H. et al. Early complications of a reduction mammoplasty technique in the treatment of macromastia with or without breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2011;11:395–399. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Miller KD, Nogueira L, Mariotto AB, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69:363–385.
Al-Ghazal L, Fallowfield RW, Blamey R. Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Eur J Cancer. 2000;36:1938–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Emiroglu M, Karaali C, Oztop MB, and Gulluoglu BM. National Consensus on Oncoplastic Breast Conserving Surgery in Turkey: Position Paper for the Standardization of Surgical PracticeTurk J Surg. 2020 Sep; 36(3): 271–277. Published online 2020 Sep 28. doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2020.4639
Weber WP, Soysal SD, Fulco I, et al. Standardization of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43:1236–1243. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Chatterjee A, Gass J, Patel K, et al. Consensus Definition and Classification System in Oncoplastic Surgery developed by the American Association of Breast Surgeons. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:3436-44. 10.1245/s10434-019-07345-4 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
Clough KB, Cuminet J, Fitoussi A, et al. Cosmetic sequelae after conservative treatment for breast cancer: classification and results of surgical correction. Ann Plast Surg 1998;41:471-81. 10.1097/00000637-199811000-00004 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Munhoz AM, Montag E, Gemperli R. Current aspects of therapeutic reduction mammaplasty for immediate early breast cancer management: An update World J Clin Oncol. 2014 Feb 10; 5(1): 1–18. Published online 2014 Feb 10. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i1.1
Clough KB, Nos C, Fitoussi A, et al. Partial reconstruction after conservative treatment for breast cancer: classification of sequelae and treatment options. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2008;53:88-101. 10.1016/j.anplas.2008.01.001 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Emiroglu M, Salimoglu S, Karaali C, Sert I, Gungor O, Sert F. et al. Oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty for breast cancer in women with macromastia: oncological long-term outcomes. Asian J Surg 2017;40:41–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar
Losken A, Dugal CS, Styblo TM, et al. A meta-analysis comparing breast conservation therapy alone to the oncoplastic technique. Ann Plast Surg 2014;72:145-9. 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182605598 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
De La Cruz L, Blankenship SA, Chatterjee A, et al. Outcomes After Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery in Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Literature Review. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23:3247-58. 10.1245/s10434-016-5313-1 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Munhoz AM, Montag E, Arruda E, et al. Assessment of immediate conservative breast surgery reconstruction: a classification system of defects revisited and an algorithm for selecting the appropriate technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:716-27 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Kronowitz SJ, Feledy JA, Hunt KK, et al. Determining the optimal approach to breast reconstruction after partial mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;117:1-11 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Slavin SA, Halperin T. Reconstruction of the breast conservation deformity. Semin Plast Surg 2004;18:89-96 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Clough KB, Thomas SS, Fitoussi AD, et al. Reconstruction after conservative treatment for breast cancer: cosmetic sequelae classification revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;114:1743-53 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Munhoz AM, Aldrighi CM, Ferreira MC. Paradigms in oncoplastic breast surgery: a careful assessment of the oncological need and aesthetic objective. Breast J 2007;13:326-7 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Hamdi M, Wolfli J, Van Landuyt K.Partial mastectomy reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 2007;34:51-62 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Audretsch WP, Rezai M, Kolotas C, et al. Tumor-specific immediate reconstruction in breast cancer patients. Persp Plast Surg 1998;11:71-100 [Google Scholar]
Clough KB, Kaufman GJ, Nos C, et al. Improving breast cancer surgery: a classification and quadrant per quadrant atlas for oncoplastic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2010;17:1375-91. 10.1245/s10434-009-0792-y [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Munhoz AM, Montag E, Arruda EG, et al. Superior-medial dermoglandular pedicle reduction mammaplasty for immediate conservative breast surgery reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2006;57:502-8 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Spear SL, Pelletiere CV, Wolfe AJ, et al. Experience with reduction mammaplasty combined with breast conservation therapy in breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;111:1102-9 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Kayar R, Çobanoğlu M, Güngör O, Çatal H, Emiroğlu M. The value of breast reduction operations in breast conservation surgery; Late results of 116 patients with breast cancer. J Breast Health. 2006;2:15–22. [Google Scholar]
Tan MP, Sitoh NY, Sim AS. Breast conservation treatment for multifocal and multicentric breast cancers in women with small-volume breast tissue. ANZ J Surg 2017;87:E5-E10. 10.1111/ans.12942 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Noguchi M, Yokoi-Noguchi M, Ohno Y, et al. Oncoplastic breast conserving surgery: Volume replacement vs. volume displacement. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016;42:926-34. 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.02.248 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Patel K, Bloom J, Nardello S, et al. An Oncoplastic Surgery Primer: Common Indications, Techniques, and Complications in Level 1 and 2 Volume Displacement Oncoplastic Surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2019;26:3063-70. 10.1245/s10434-019-07592-5 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Dogan L, Gulcelik MA, Karaman N, Camlibel M, Serdar GK, Ozaslan C. Intraglandular flap technique for tumors located in the upper outer quadrant of the breast. Clin Breast Cancer. 2012;12:194–198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2012.03.010. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Yang JD, Kim MC, Lee JW, et al. Usefulness of Oncoplastic Volume Replacement Techniques after Breast Conserving Surgery in Small to Moderate-sized Breasts. Arch Plast Surg 2012;39:489-96. 10.5999/aps.2012.39.5.489 [PMCfree article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Lee JW, Kim MC, Park HY, et al. Oncoplastic volume replacement techniques according to the excised volume and tumor location in small- to moderate-sized breasts. Gland Surg 2014;3:14-21. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Emiroğlu M, Inal A, Sert I, Ilhan E, Peker K, Gülçelik MA, Güngör H, Salimoğlu S, Can D, Ellidokuz H, Aydın C. The Approach of General Surgeons to Oncoplastic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery in Turkey: A Survey of Practice Patterns. Balkan Medical Journal, 31(4), 307-312., Doi: 10.5152/balkanmedj. 2014.13230, (Kontrol No: 2584227)
Khayat E, Brackstone M, Maxwell J, et al. Training Canadian surgeons in oncoplastic breast surgery: Where do we stand? Can J Surg. 2017;60:369–71. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Emiroğlu M, KuruB, Gülçelik MA, Atahan MK, Sezer AY, Karaali C, ark’nın. The Main Topics at the Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Course and Expert Panel.J Breast Health. 2017;1;13(1):46-49.
Kaufman CS. Increasing role of oncoplastic surgery for breast cancer. Curr Oncol Rep. 2019;21:111. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Clough KB, Ihrai T, Oden S, et al. Oncoplastic surgery for breast cancer based on tumour location and a quadrant-per-quadrant atlas. Br J Surg. 2012;99:1389–1395. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Berrino P, Campora E, Santi P.Postquadrantectomy breast deformities; classification and techniques of surgical correction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987;79:567-72 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Chatterjee A, Gass J, Patel K, et al. A Consensus Definition and Classification System of Oncoplastic Surgery Developed by the American Society of Breast Surgeons. Ann Surg Oncol 2019;26:3436-44. 10.1245/s10434-019-07345-4 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Rietjens M, Urban CA, Rey PC, et al. Long-term oncological results of breast conservative treatment with oncoplastic surgery. Breast 2007;16:387-95 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Fitzal F, Mittlboeck M, Trischler H.Breast-conserving therapy for centrally located breast cancer. Ann Surg 2008;247:470-6 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Arnaout A, Ross D, Khayat E, et al. Position statement on defining and standardizing an oncoplastic approach to breast-conserving surgery in Canada. Curr Oncol. 2019;26:e405–e409. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Yang JD, Lee JW, Cho YK, et al. Surgical techniques for personalized oncoplastic surgery in breast cancer patients with small- to moderate-sized breasts (part 2): volume replacement. J Breast Cancer 2012;15:7-14. 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.7 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Rainsbury RM. Breast-sparing reconstruction with latissimus dorsi miniflaps. Eur J Surg Oncol 2002;28:891-5. 10.1053/ejso.2002.1350 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Audretsch W, Rezai M, Kolotas C. Tumor-specific immediate reconstruction in breast cancer patients. Perspec Plast Surg. 1998;11:71–79. [Google Scholar]
Crown A, Laskin R, Rocha FG, et al. Extreme oncoplasty: Expanding indications for breast conservation. Am J Surg 2019;217:851-6. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.01.004 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar
Refaat M, Abouelnagah G, Awad AT, et al. Modified round block technique for peripherally located early cancer breast, a technique that fits for all quadrants. Breast J 2020;26:414-9. 10.1111/tbj.13485 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Losken A, Pinell-White X, Hart AM, et al. The oncoplastic reduction approach to breast conservation therapy: benefits for margin control. Aesthet Surg J 2014;34:1185-91. 10.1177/1090820X14545618 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Clough KB, Gouveia PF, Benyahi D, et al. Positive Margins After Oncoplastic Surgery for Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2015;22:4247-53. 10.1245/s10434-015-4514-3 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Ho W, Stallard S, Doughty J, et al. Oncological Outcomes and Complications After Volume Replacement Oncoplastic Breast Conservations-The Glasgow Experience. Breast Cancer (Auckl) 2016;10:223-8. 10.4137/BCBCR.S41017 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Tan MP, Sitoh NY, Sim AS. Breast conservation treatment for multifocal and multicentric breast cancers in women with small-volume breast tissue. ANZ J Surg 2017;87:E5-E10. 10.1111/ans.12942 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Schaverien MV, Raine C, Majdak-Paredes E, Dixon JM. Therapeutic mammaplasty--extending indications and achieving low incomplete excision rates. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39:329–333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2013.01.006. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Kapadia SM, Reitz A, Hart A, et al. Time to Radiation After Oncoplastic Reduction. Ann Plast Surg 2019;82:15-8. 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001598 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Piper M, Peled AW, Sbitany H, et al. Comparison of Mammographic Findings Following Oncoplastic Mammoplasty and Lumpectomy Without Reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23:65-71. 10.1245/s10434-015-4611-3 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
De La Cruz L, Blankenship SA, Chatterjee A, et al. Outcomes After Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery in Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Literature Review. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23:3247-58. 10.1245/s10434-016-5313-1 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Gulcelik MA, Dogan L, Yuksel M, Camlibel M, Ozaslan C, Reis E. Comparison of outcomes of standard and oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery. J Breast Cancer. 2013;16:193–197. http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2013.16.2.193. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Khan J, Barrett S, Forte C, et al. Oncoplastic breast conservation does not lead to a delay in the commencement of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 2013;39:887-91. 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.05.005 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Carter SA, Lyons GR, Kuerer HM, et al. Operative and Oncologic Outcomes in 9861 Patients with Operable Breast Cancer: Single-Institution Analysis of Breast Conservation with Oncoplastic Reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23:3190-8. 10.1245/s10434-016-5407-9 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Kosasih S, Tayeh S, Mokbel K, et al. Is oncoplastic breast conserving surgery oncologically safe? A meta-analysis of 18,103 patients. Am J Surg 2020;220:385-392. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.12.019 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
De Lorenzi F, Hubner G, Rotmensz N, et al. Oncological results of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery: Long term follow-up of a large series at a single institution: A matched-cohort analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016;42:71-7. 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.08.160 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Carter SA, Lyons GR, Kuerer HM, et al. Operative and Oncologic Outcomes in 9861 Patients with Operable Breast Cancer: Single-Institution Analysis of Breast Conservation with Oncoplastic Reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23:3190-8. 10.1245/s10434-016-5407-9 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Dolan R, Patel M, Weiler-Mithoff E, et al. Imaging Results Following Oncoplastic and Standard Breast Conserving Surgery. Breast Care (Basel) 2015;10:325-9. 10.1159/000437105 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Mansell J, Weiler-Mithoff E, Stallard S, et al. Oncoplastic breast conservation surgery is oncologically safe when compared to wide local excision and mastectomy. Breast 2017;32:179-85. 10.1016/j.breast.2017.02.006 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Rainsbury RM. Surgery insight: Oncoplastic breast-conserving reconstruction--indications, benefits, choices and outcomes. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2007;4:657–664. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0957. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Cardoso MJ, Cardoso JS, Vrieling C, Macmillan D, Rainsbury D, Heil J, Hau E, Keshtgar M. Recommendations for the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;135:629–637. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-1978-8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Tenofsky PL, Dowell P, Topalovski T, Helmer SD. Surgical, oncologic, and cosmetic differences between oncoplastic and nononcoplastic breast conserving surgery in breast cancer patients. Am J Surg. 2014;207:398–402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.09.017. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Cardoso MJ, Cardoso JS, Vrieling C, Macmillan D, Rainsbury D, Heil J, Hau E, Keshtgar M. Recommendations for the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;135:629–637. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-1978-8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Haloua M.H., Krekel N.M.A., Jacobs G.J.A., Zonderhuis B., Bouman M.-B., Buncamper M.E., Niessen F.B., Winters H.A.H., Terwee C., Meijer S., van den Tol M.P. Cosmetic outcome assessment following breast-conserving therapy: a comparison between bcct.core software and panel evaluation. International journal of breast cancer. 2014;2014 716860–716860. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.06.008. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Cardoso M.J., Vrieling C., Cardoso J.S., Oliveira H.P., Williams N.R., Dixon J.M., the PICTURE Project Clinical Trial Team, & the PICTURE Project Delphi Panel The value of 3d images in aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment. results from a prospective multicentric clinical trial. Breast. 2018;41:19–24
Cohen WA, Mundy LR, Ballard TN, et al. The BREAST-Q in surgical research: a review of the literature 2009–2015. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69:149–162. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Kelemen P, Pukancsik D, Újhelyi M, et al. Comparison of clinicopathologic, cosmetic and quality of life outcomes in 700 oncoplastic and conventional breast-conserving surgery cases: A single-centre retrospective study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019;45:118-24. 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.09.006 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Rose M, Svensson H, Handler J, et al. Patient-reported outcome after oncoplastic breast surgery compared with conventional breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020;180:247-56. 10.1007/s10549-020-05544-2 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
