Ferguson Hemoroidektomi
Özet
Ferguson hemoroidektomi, semptomatik evre III ve IV hemoroidlerin tedavisinde en başarılı cerrahi seçeneklerden biridir ve kapalı hemoroidektomi olarak da bilinir. Ameliyat endikasyonu hastalığın evresi ile semptomların şiddetine göre belirlenmekte olup, genellikle konservatif tedavilerin başarısız olduğu durumlarda tercih edilir. Orijinal teknikte, perianal deriden anorektal bileşkeye kadar eliptik bir kesi yapılarak hemoroidal dokular sfinkter kasları korunacak şekilde eksize edilir ve mukoza ile cilt emilebilir sütürlerle kapatılır. Operasyon sonrasında en önemli sorun postoperatif ağrıdır. Ağrı kontrolünde pudental sinir bloğu, hasta kontrollü analjezi (PCA), topikal ilaçlar ve erken dönemde sıcak su uygulaması gibi multimodal yöntemler etkin şekilde kullanılmaktadır. Ferguson tekniği, Milligan-Morgan (açık) yöntemine kıyasla daha az ağrı, daha düşük kanama riski, daha hızlı yara iyileşmesi ve en düşük nüks oranına sahip olmasıyla öne çıkar. İdrar retansiyonu, gecikmiş kanama ve anal stenoz gibi komplikasyon riskleri barındırsa da evre III-IV hemoroidal hastalıkta başarısı kanıtlanmış güvenilir bir cerrahi yöntemdir.
Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy, also known as closed hemorrhoidectomy, is one of the most successful surgical options for treating symptomatic stage III and IV hemorrhoids. The surgical indication is determined by the stage of the disease and the severity of symptoms, typically preferred when conservative treatments fail. In the original technique, an elliptical incision is made from the perianal skin to the anorectal junction, hemorrhoidal tissues are excised while preserving the sphincter muscles, and the mucosa and skin are closed using absorbable sutures. Postoperative pain remains the most significant challenge following the procedure. Multimodal methods, including pudendal nerve blocks, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), topical medications, and early warm water applications, are effectively utilized for pain management. Compared to the Milligan-Morgan (open) technique, the Ferguson procedure stands out with less pain, lower risk of postoperative bleeding, faster wound healing, and the lowest recurrence rate. Although it carries potential complication risks such as urinary retention, delayed bleeding, and anal stenosis, it remains a highly successful and proven surgical method for advanced hemorrhoidal disease.
Referanslar
MacRae, H.M., R.S.J.D.o.t.c. McLeod, and rectum, Comparison of hemorrhoidal treatment modalities. 1995. 38(7): p. 687-694.
Wang, J.-Y., et al., Randomized controlled trial of LigaSure with submucosal dissection versus Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsed hemorrhoids. 2006. 30(3): p. 462-466.
Ferguson, J., et al., The closed technique of hemorrhoidectomy. 1971. 70(3): p. 480-484.
Milone, M., et al., Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: is still the gold standard treatment? 2012. 64(3): p. 191-194.
Beattie, G.C., R.G. Wilson, and M.A. Loudon, The contemporary management of haemorrhoids. Colorectal Dis, 2002. 4(6): p. 450-4.
Bleday, R., et al., Symptomatic hemorrhoids: current incidence and complications of operative therapy. 1992. 35(5): p. 477-481.
Wanis, K.N., et al., Systemic metronidazole may not reduce posthemorrhoidectomy pain: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. 2017. 60(4): p. 446-455.
Davids, J.S., T.J.J.T.A.T.o.C. Ridolfi, and R. Surgery, Hemorrhoids. 2022: p. 209-229.
Brummett, C.M., et al., New persistent opioid use after minor and major surgical procedures in US adults. 2017. 152(6): p. e170504-e170504.
Collins, J.B., J. Song, and R.C.J.C.J.o.P.S. Mahabir, Onset and duration of intradermal mixtures of bupivacaine and lidocaine with epinephrine. 2013. 21(1): p. 51-53.
Mongelli, F., et al., Pudendal nerve block in hemorrhoid surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. 2021. 64(5): p. 617-631.
Hancke, E., et al., Schmerzmanagement nach Hämorrhoidektomie. 2013. 84(7): p. 587-593.
Xia, W., et al., Topical analgesia following excisional haemorrhoidectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. 2020. 35(2): p. 181-197.
Ala, S., et al., Effect of topical baclofen 5% on post-hemorrhoidectomy pain: randomized double blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. 2020. 24(2): p. 405-410.
Ratnasingham, K., et al., Meta-analysis of the use of glyceryl trinitrate ointment after haemorrhoidectomy as an analgesic and in promoting wound healing. 2010. 8(8): p. 606-611.
Linares-Gil, M.J., et al., Topical analgesia with lidocaine plus diclofenac decreases pain in benign anorectal surgery: randomized, double-blind, and controlled clinical trial. 2018. 9(11).
Perrotti, P., et al., Topical nifedipine with lidocaine ointment versus active control for pain after hemorrhoidectomy: results of a multicentre, prospective, randomized, double-blind study. 2010. 53(1): p. 17.
Balta, A.Z., et al., The effect of early warm plastic bag application on postoperative pain after hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. 2015. 81(2): p. 182-186.
Lyons, N., et al., Systematic review and meta‐analysis of the role of metronidazole in post‐haemorrhoidectomy pain relief. 2017. 19(9): p. 803-811.
Xia, W., et al., Metronidazole following excisional haemorrhoidectomy: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. 2018. 88(5): p. 408-414.
Chen, H.H., et al., Effective management of posthemorrhoidectomy secondary hemorrhage using rectal irrigation. 2002. 45(2): p. 234-238.
Chen, H.H., et al., Risk factors associated with posthemorrhoidectomy secondary hemorrhage. 2002. 45(8): p. 1096-1099.
Rosen, L., et al., Outcome of delayed hemorrhage following surgical hemorrhoidectomy. 1993. 36(8): p. 743-746.
Wilkins, B.D.J.J.o.t.A.M.A., Gastrointestinal bleeding as seen by the proctologist. 1957. 163(14): p. 1214-1216.
Farrer, F.E.J.D.o.t.C. and Rectum, Delayed postoperative anorectal hemorrhage. 1961. 4(1): p. 50-55.
Bhatti, M.I., M.S. Sajid, and M.K.J.W.j.o.s. Baig, Milligan–Morgan (open) versus Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy (closed): a systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized, controlled trials. 2016. 40(6): p. 1509-1519.
Eu, K.W., et al., Anal stricture following haemorrhoidectomy: early diagnosis and treatment. 1995. 65(2): p. 101-103.
Carditello, A., et al., Surgical treatment of anal stenosis following hemorrhoid surgery. Results of 150 combined mucosal advancement and internal sphincterotomy. 2002. 54(6): p. 841-844.
Lohsiriwat, V., Treatment of hemorrhoids: A coloproctologist’s view. World Journal of Gastroenterology: WJG, 2015. 21(31): p. 9245.
Jin, J., et al., Interventional treatments for prolapsing haemorrhoids: network meta-analysis. 2021. 5(5): p. zrab091.
Tsunoda, A., et al., Randomized controlled trial of bipolar diathermy vs ultrasonic scalpel for closed hemorrhoidectomy. 2011. 3(10): p. 147.
