Preterm Doğumları Önlemede Servikal Serklaj

Yazarlar

Emrah Dağdeviren

Özet

Servikal serklaj, servikal yetmezlik durumunda uterin serviksin sütürlerle desteklenmesini sağlayarak preterm doğumu, membran prolapsusunu ve fetal ölümü azaltmayı hedefleyen cerrahi bir işlemdir. Transvajinal, transabdominal ve laparoskopik yöntemlerle uygulanabilen işlem, en çok transvajinal olarak (Shirodkar ve McDonald teknikleri) gebeliğin 12-24. haftaları arasında tercih edilir. Fizik muayeneye bağlı (acil) serklajlarda enfeksiyon riskine karşı antibiyotik ve tokoliz profilaksisi önerilirken, ultrason bağımlı işlemlerde bu rutin değildir. Transabdominal yaklaşım ise daha morbid bir işlem olup, başarısız vajinal serklaj öyküsü, ampute veya aşırı kısa serviks varlığında prekonsepsiyonel veya erken gebelik döneminde tercih edilir; düşük morbiditesi nedeniyle deneyimli ellerde laparoskopik yöntem önceliklidir. Transvajinal serklajlar genellikle 36-37. haftalarda elektif olarak çıkarılıp vajinal doğuma izin verilirken, transabdominal serklajı olan hastalara 36+0 ile 37+6. haftalar arasında planlı sezaryen doğum önerilir ve sütür sonraki gebelikler için yerinde bırakılabilir. Her iki yöntemde de koryoamniyonit, aktif kanama ve preterm erken membran rüptürü gibi durumlar kesin veya göreceli kontrendikasyon oluşturur.

Cervical cerclage is a surgical procedure aimed at reducing preterm birth, fetal membrane prolapse, and fetal loss by supporting the uterine cervix with sutures in cases of cervical insufficiency. The procedure can be performed via transvaginal, transabdominal, or laparoscopic approaches, with the transvaginal method (Shirodkar and McDonald techniques) being most commonly preferred between the 12th and 24th weeks of gestation. While antibiotic and tocolytic prophylaxis is recommended for examination-indicated (emergency) cerclage due to infection risks, it is not routinely applied in ultrasound-indicated procedures. The transabdominal approach is a more morbid procedure and is preferred either preconceptionally or during early pregnancy in patients with a history of failed vaginal cerclage, an amputated cervix, or an extremely short cervix; the laparoscopic method is favored if adequate surgical experience is available due to its lower morbidity. Transvaginal cerclages are generally removed electively at 36-37 weeks to allow vaginal delivery, whereas for patients with transabdominal cerclage, a planned cesarean delivery is recommended between 36+0 and 37+6 weeks of gestation, and the suture can be left in situ for future pregnancies. Under both methods, conditions such as chorioamnionitis, active bleeding, and preterm premature rupture of membranes constitute absolute or relative contraindications.

Referanslar

Uzun Cilingir I, Sayin C, Sutcu H, İnan C, Erzincan S, Yener C, et al. Does emergency cerclage really works in patients with advanced cervical dilatation? Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction. 2019;48(6):387-90.

Harger JH. Cerclage and cervical insufficiency: an evidence-based analysis. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2002;100(6):1313-27.

Freegard GD, Donadono V, Impey LWM. Emergency cervical cerclage in twin and singleton pregnancies with 0-mm cervical length or prolapsed membranes. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2021;100(11):2003-8.

Liao Y, Wen H, Ouyang S, Yuan Y, Bi J, Guan Y, et al. Routine first-trimester ultrasound screening using a standardized anatomical protocol. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2021;224(4):396.e1-.e15.

Caruso A, Trivellini C, De Carolis S, Paradisi G, Mancuso S, Ferrazzani S. Emergency cerclage in the presence of protruding membranes: is pregnancy outcome predictable? Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2000;79(4):265-8.

Mönckeberg M, Valdés R, Kusanovic JP, Schepeler M, Nien JK, Pertossi E, et al. Patients with acute cervical insufficiency without intra-amniotic infection/inflammation treated with cerclage have a good prognosis. Journal of perinatal medicine. 2019;47(5):500-9.

Mays JK, Figueroa R, Shah J, Khakoo H, Kaminsky S, Tejani N. Amniocentesis for selection before rescue cerclage. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2000;95(5):652-5.

Berghella V, Ludmir J, Simonazzi G, Owen J. Transvaginal cervical cerclage: evidence for perioperative management strategies. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2013;209(3):181-92.

Novy MJ, Ducsay CA, Stanczyk FZ. Plasma concentrations of prostaglandin F2 alpha and prostaglandin E2 metabolites after transabdominal and transvaginal cervical cerclage. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1987;156(6):1543-52.

ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 199: Use of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Labor and Delivery. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2018;132(3):e103-e19.

Visintine J, Airoldi J, Berghella V. Indomethacin administration at the time of ultrasound-indicated cerclage: is there an association with a reduction in spontaneous preterm birth? American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2008;198(6):643.e1-3.

Miller ES, Grobman WA, Fonseca L, Robinson BK. Indomethacin and antibiotics in examination-indicated cerclage: a randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2014;123(6):1311-6

Skupski DW, Lin SN, Reiss J, Eglinton GS. Extremely short cervix in the second trimester: bed rest or modified Shirodkar cerclage? Journal of perinatal medicine. 2014;42(1):55-9.

Scheerer LJ, Lam F, Bartolucci L, Katz M. A new technique for reduction of prolapsed fetal membranes for emergency cervical cerclage. Obstetrics and gynecology. 1989;74(3 Pt 1):408-10.

Kanai M, Ashida T, Ohira S, Osada R, Konishi I. A new technique using a rubber balloon in emergency second trimester cerclage for fetal membrane prolapse. The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research. 2008;34(6):935-40.

Locatelli A, Vergani P, Bellini P, Strobelt N, Arreghini A, Ghidini A. Amnioreduction in emergency cerclage with prolapsed membranes: comparison of two methods for reducing the membranes. American journal of perinatology. 1999;16(2):73-7.

ACOG Practice Bulletin No.142: Cerclage for the management of cervical insufficiency. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2014;123(2 Pt 1):372-9.

Groom KM, Shennan AH, Bennett PR. Ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage: outcome depends on preoperative cervical length and presence of visible membranes at time of cerclage. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2002;187(2):445-9.

Rust OA, Atlas RO, Meyn J, Wells M, Kimmel S. Does cerclage location influence perinatal outcome? American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2003;189(6):1688-91.

Berghella V, Rafael TJ, Szychowski JM, Rust OA, Owen J. Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography in women with singleton gestations and previous preterm birth: a meta-analysis. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2011;117(3):663-71.

McDonald IA. Suture of the cervix for inevitable miscarriage. The Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of the British Empire. 1957;64(3):346-50.

Treadwell MC, Bronsteen RA, Bottoms SF. Prognostic factors and complication rates for cervical cerclage: a review of 482 cases. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1991;165(3):555-8.

Berghella V, Szychowski JM, Owen J, Hankins G, Iams JD, Sheffield JS, et al. Suture type and ultrasound-indicated cerclage efficacy. The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstet. 2012;25(11):2287-90.

Scheib S, Visintine JF, Miroshnichenko G, Harvey C, Rychlak K, Berghella V. Is cerclage height associated with the incidence of preterm birth in women with an ultrasound-indicated cerclage? American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2009;200(5):e12-5.

Ludmir J, Jackson GM, Samuels P. Transvaginal cerclage under ultrasound guidance in cases of severe cervical hypoplasia. Obstetrics and gynecology. 1991;78(6):1067-72.

Atia H, Ellaithy M, Altraigey A, Ibrahim H. Knot positioning during McDonald cervical cerclage, does it make a difference? A cohort study. The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstet. 2019;32(22):3757-63.

Giraldo-Isaza MA, Fried GP, Hegarty SE, Suescum-Diaz MA, Cohen AW, Berghella V. Comparison of 2 stitches vs 1 stitch for transvaginal cervical cerclage for preterm birth prevention. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2013;208(3):209.e1-9.

Brix N, Secher NJ, McCormack CD, Helmig RB, Hein M, Weber T, et al. Randomised trial of cervical cerclage, with and without occlusion, for the prevention of preterm birth in women suspected for cervical insufficiency. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2013;120(5):613-20.

Final report of the Medical Research Council/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists multicentre randomised trial of cervical cerclage. MRC/RCOG Working Party on Cervical Cerclage. British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 1993;100(6):516-23. Epub 1993/06/01. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb15300.x. PubMed PMID: 8334085.

Miller ES, Gerber SE. Association between sonographic cervical appearance and preterm delivery after a history-indicated cerclage. Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2014;33(12):2181-6.

Duhig KE, Chandiramani M, Seed PT, Briley AL, Kenyon AP, Shennan AH. Fetal fibronectin as a predictor of spontaneous preterm labour in asymptomatic women with a cervical cerclage. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2009;116(6):799-803.

Simonazzi G, Curti A, Bisulli M, Seravalli V, Saccone G, Berghella V. Cervical lacerations in planned versus labor cerclage removal: a systematic review. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. 2015;193:19-22.

Bisulli M, Suhag A, Arvon R, Seibel-Seamon J, Visintine J, Berghella V. Interval to spontaneous delivery after elective removal of cerclage. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2009;201(2):163.e1-4.

McElrath TF, Norwitz ER, Lieberman ES, Heffner LJ. Management of cervical cerclage and preterm premature rupture of the membranes: should the stitch be removed? American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2000;183(4):840-6.

Suff N, Kunitsyna M, Shennan A, Chandiramani M. Optimal timing of cervical cerclage removal following preterm premature rupture of membranes; a retrospective analysis. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. 2021;259:75-80.

Galyean A, Garite TJ, Maurel K, Abril D, Adair CD, Browne P, et al. Removal versus retention of cerclage in preterm premature rupture of membranes: a randomized controlled trial. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2014;211(4):399.e1-7.

Kuruma A, Hayashi S, Koh I, Yamamoto R, Mitsuda N, Ishii K. Incidences of complications associated with cervical cerclage by indication of the procedure. The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research. 2022;48(1):73-9.

Muniz Rodriguez A, Pastor A, Fox NS. The Association between Shirodkar Cerclage and Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes in Singleton Pregnancies. American journal of perinatology. 2021;38(S 01):e347-e50.

Bauer ME, Bateman BT, Bauer ST, Shanks AM, Mhyre JM. Maternal sepsis mortality and morbidity during hospitalization for delivery: temporal trends and independent associations for severe sepsis. Anesthesia and analgesia. 2013;117(4):944-50.

Baxter JK, Airoldi J, Berghella V. Short cervical length after history-indicated cerclage: is a reinforcing cerclage beneficial? American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2005;193(3 Pt 2):1204-7

Bauer AM, Lappen JR, Hackney DN. Term Labor Outcomes after Cerclage Placement in a Multi-institutional Cohort. American journal of perinatology. 2020;37(1):119-26.

Harger JH. Cervical cerclage: patient selection, morbidity, and success rates. Clinics in perinatology. 1983;10(2):321-41.

Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Medley N. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2017;6(6):Cd008991.

Zaveri V, Aghajafari F, Amankwah K, Hannah M. Abdominal versus vaginal cerclage after a failed transvaginal cerclage: a systematic review. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2002;187(4):868-72.

Debbs RH, DeLa Vega GA, Pearson S, Sehdev H, Marchiano D, Ludmir J. Transabdominal cerclage after comprehensive evaluation of women with previous unsuccessful transvaginal cerclage. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2007;197(3):317.e1-4.

Shennan A, Chandiramani M, Bennett P, David AL, Girling J, Ridout A, et al. MAVRIC: a multicenter randomized controlled trial of transabdominal vs transvaginal cervical cerclage. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2020;222(3):261.e1-.e9.

Marchand G, Taher Masoud A, Azadi A, Govindan M, Ware K, King A, et al. Efficacy of laparoscopic and trans-abdominal cerclage (TAC) in patients with cervical insufficiency: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. 2022;270:111-25.

Marchand GJ, Masoud AT, Galitsky A, Sainz K, Azadi A, Ware K, et al. Complications of Laparoscopic and Transabdominal Cerclage in Patients with Cervical Insufficiency: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. 2021;28(4):759-68.e2.

Herron MA, Parer JT. Transabdominal cerclage for fetal wastage due to cervical incompetence. Obstetrics and gynecology. 1988;71(6 Pt 1):865-8.

ACOG Practice Bulletin. Cervical insufficiency. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2003;102(5 Pt 1):1091-9.

Cobo E, Conde-Agudelo A, Delgado J, Canaval H, Congote A. Cervical cerclage: an alternative for the management of placenta previa? American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1998;179(1):122-5.

Debiève F, Joskin A, Steenhaut P, Bernard P, Hubinont C. Transabdominal cerclage for cervical insufficiency in twins: series of seven cases and literature review. The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstet. 2020;33(21):3579-83.

Tulandi T, Alghanaim N, Hakeem G, Tan X. Pre and post-conceptional abdominal cerclage by laparoscopy or laparotomy. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. 2014;21(6):987-93.

Dawood F, Farquharson RG. Transabdominal cerclage: preconceptual versus first trimester insertion. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. 2016;199:27-31.

Burger NB, Einarsson JI, Brölmann HA, Vree FE, McElrath TF, Huirne JA. Preconceptional laparoscopic abdominal cerclage: a multicenter cohort study. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2012;207(4):273.e1-12.

Vousden NJ, Carter J, Seed PT, Shennan AH. What is the impact of preconception abdominal cerclage on fertility: evidence from a randomized controlled trial. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2017;96(5):543-6.

Demirel C, Goksever Celik H, Tulek F, Kucukdemir B, Gokalp D, Ergin T, et al. Fertility outcomes after preconceptional laparoscopic abdominal cerclage for second-trimester pregnancy losses. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. 2021;257:59-63.

Moawad GN, Tyan P, Bracke T, Abi Khalil ED, Vargas V, Gimovsky A, et al. Systematic Review of Transabdominal Cerclage Placed via Laparoscopy for the Prevention of Preterm Birth. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. 2018;25(2):277-86.

Joung EJ, Go EB, Kwack JY, Kwon YS. Successful term delivery cases of trans-abdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage performed at more than 18 weeks of gestation. Obstetrics & gynecology science. 2016;59(4):319-22.

Novy MJ. Transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage: a reappraisal 25 years after its introduction. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1991;164(6 Pt 1):1635-41; discussion 41-2.

Norwitz E, Goldstein D. Transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage: Learning to tie the knot. J Gynecol Tech. 1996;2:49-54.

Lee R, Biats D, Mancuso M. Robotic transabdominal cerclage: a case series illustrating costs. Journal of robotic surgery. 2018;12(2):361-4.

Vissers J, van Kesteren PJ, Bekedam DJ. Laparoscopic abdominal cerclage during pregnancy: Report on two cases using a McCartney tube. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2017;37(3):383-4.

Vahanian SA, Chavez MR, Murphy J, Vetere P, Nezhat FR, Vintzileos AM. Ultrasound-Guided Laparoscopic-Assisted Abdominal Cerclage in Pregnancy. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. 2018;25(3):366-7.

Witt MU, Joy SD, Clark J, Herring A, Bowes WA, Thorp JM. Cervicoisthmic cerclage: transabdominal vs transvaginal approach. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2009;201(1):105.e1-4.

Foster TL, Moore ES, Sumners JE. Operative complications and fetal morbidity encountered in 300 prophylactic transabdominal cervical cerclage procedures by one obstetric surgeon. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2011;31(8):713-7.

Norwitz E, Lee D, Goldstein D. Transabdominal cervico-isthmic cerclage: placing the stitch before conception. Journal of Gynecologic Techniques. 1997;3:53.

Dandapani M, Pflugner LP, Fanning NS. Uterine Rupture at Term in a Patient With Abdominal Cerclage. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2019;133(5):940-2.

Hawkins E, Nimaroff M. Vaginal erosion of an abdominal cerclage 7 years after laparoscopic placement. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2014;123(2 Pt 2 Suppl 2):420-3.

Ades A, Hawkins DP. Laparoscopic Transabdominal Cerclage and Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes When Left In Situ. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2019;133(6):1195-8.

Dethier D, Lassey SC, Pilliod R, Einarsson JI, McElrath T, Bartz D. Uterine evacuation in the setting of transabdominal cerclage. Contraception. 2020;101(3):174-7.

Burger NB, van 't Hof EM, Huirne JAF. Removal of an Abdominal Cerclage by Colpotomy: A Novel and Minimally Invasive Technique. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. 2020;27(7):1636-9.

Gelecek

13 Ocak 2023

Lisans

Lisans