Robotik Cerrahi Tekniği ve Geleceği
Özet
Jinekolojik cerrahide robotik sistemlerin tarihsel gelişimini, teknik altyapısını ve güncel klinik uygulamalarını kapsamlı bir şekilde ele alan bu metinde, robotik kavramının tarihçesinin 1920'lere dayandığı ve tıp literatürüne PUMA 560 ile girdiği belirtilmektedir. Gelişim sürecinde ROBODOC, AESOP ve ZEUS gibi sistemlerin ardından, günümüzde cerrahi konsol, robotik kollar ve kule (vision card) olmak üzere üç ana bileşenden oluşan Da Vinci platformu öne çıkmaktadır. Bu teknoloji, cerrahlara yüksek çözünürlüklü 3D görüntüleme, fizyolojik titremeleri filtreleme ve 7 eklemli hareket kabiliyeti sunarak ameliyatlardaki hassasiyeti artırmaktadır. Jinekoloji alanında histerektomi, miyomektomi, sakrokolpopeksi, endometriozis, tubal reanastomoz ve jinekolojik onkoloji (endometrium ve serviks kanserleri) operasyonlarında aktif olarak kullanılan robotik yaklaşım; geleneksel laparoskopi ve açık cerrahiye kıyasla daha az kan kaybı ve daha kısa hastanede kalış süresi gibi önemli avantajlar sağlamaktadır. Bununla birlikte, uzun öğrenme eğrisi ve yüksek maliyet gibi dezavantajlar nedeniyle hasta seçiminin titizlikle yapılması ve bu eğitimin uzmanlık programlarına dahil edilmesi gerektiği vurgulanmaktadır.
This text, which comprehensively addresses the historical development, technical infrastructure, and current clinical applications of robotic systems in gynecological surgery, states that the history of the robotic concept dates back to the 1920s and entered the medical literature with PUMA 560. Following systems like ROBODOC, AESOP, and ZEUS in the development process, today the Da Vinci platform, consisting of three main components: the surgeon's console, robotic arms, and the vision cart, stands out. This technology increases precision in operations by offering surgeons high-resolution 3D imaging, physiological tremor filtering, and 7-jointed mobility. Actively used in gynecology for hysterectomy, myomectomy, sacrocolpopexy, endometriosis, tubal reanastomosis, and gynecological oncology (endometrial and cervical cancers) operations, the robotic approach provides significant advantages such as less blood loss and shorter hospital stays compared to traditional laparoscopy and open surgery. However, it is emphasized that patient selection must be made meticulously due to disadvantages like a long learning curve and high costs, and this training should be included in residency programs.
Referanslar
Advincula, A. P., Song, A., Burke, W., & Reynolds, R. K. (2004). Preliminary Experience with Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Myomectomy. The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, 11(4), 511–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1074-3804(05)60085-0
Aidan, P., & Bechara, M. (2017). Gasless trans-axillary robotic thyroidectomy: The introduction and principle. Gland Surgery, 6, 229–235. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2017.03.19
Albright, B. B., Witte, T., Tofte, A. N., Chou, J., Black, J. D., Desai, V. B., & Erekson, E. A. (2016). Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 23(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.003
Asimov, I. (2010). Visioni di robot. Il Saggiatore.
Baeten, I. G. T., Hoogendam, J. P., Jeremiasse, B., Braat, A. J. A. T., Veldhuis, W. B., Jonges, G. N., Jürgenliemk‐Schulz, I. M., van Gils, C. H., Zweemer, R. P., & Gerestein, C. G. (2021). Indocyanine green versus technetium‐99m with blue dye for sentinel lymph node detection in early‐stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Cancer Reports, 5(1), e1401. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1401
Ballantyne, G. H., Marescaux, J., & Giulianotti, P. C. (2004). Primer of Robotic and Telerobotic Surgery. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Baştu, E., Çeli̇K, C., & Buyru, F. (2013). REPRODÜKTİF TIPTA ROBOTİK CERRAHİYE GENEL BAKIŞ. 76(1), 7.
Bedaiwy, M. A., Abdel Rahman, M. Y., Chapman, M., Frasure, H., Mahajan, S., von Gruenigen, V. E., Hurd, W., & Zanotti, K. (2013). Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for the Management of Severe Endometriosis: A Retrospective Review of Short-Term Surgical Outcomes. JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, 17(1), 95–99. https://doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13517013317275
Beste, T. M., Nelson, K. H., & Daucher, J. A. (2005). Total laparoscopic hysterectomy utilizing a robotic surgical system. JSLS: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, 9(1), 13–15.
Bizzarri, N., Restaino, S., Gueli Alletti, S., Monterossi, G., Gioè, A., La Fera, E., Gallotta, V., Fagotti, A., Scambia, G., & Fanfani, F. (n.d.). Sentinel lymph node detection in endometrial cancer with indocyanine green: Laparoscopic versus robotic approach. Facts, Views & Vision in ObGyn, 13(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.13.1.002
Bogani, G., Cromi, A., Uccella, S., Serati, M., Casarin, J., Pinelli, C., & Ghezzi, F. (2014). Laparoscopic Versus Open Abdominal Management of Cervical Cancer: Long-Term Results From a Propensity-Matched Analysis. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 21(5), 857–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2014.03.018
Boggess, J. F., Gehrig, P. A., Cantrell, L., Shafer, A., Ridgway, M., Skinner, E. N., & Fowler, W. C. (2008). A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 199(4), 357.e1-357.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.058
Boztosun, A., & Olgan, S. (2016). Robotic Sigmoid Vaginoplasty in an Adolescent Girl With Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser Syndrome. Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, 22(5), e32-35. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000294
Bulun, S. E. (2013). Uterine Fibroids. New England Journal of Medicine, 369(14), 1344–1355. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1209993
Burke, T. W., Levenback, C., Tornos, C., Morris, M., Wharton, J. T., & Gershenson, D. M. (1996). Intraabdominal lymphatic mapping to direct selective pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in women with high-risk endometrial cancer: Results of a pilot study. Gynecologic Oncology, 62(2), 169–173. https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.1996.0211
Cao, T., Feng, Y., Huang, Q., Wan, T., & Liu, J. (2015). Prognostic and Safety Roles in Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: A Meta-analysis. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 25(12), 990–998. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2015.0390
Casarin, J., Multinu, F., Tortorella, L., Cappuccio, S., Weaver, A. L., Ghezzi, F., Cliby, W., Kumar, A., Langstraat, C., Glaser, G., & Mariani, A. (2020). Sentinel lymph node biopsy for robotic-assisted endometrial cancer staging: Further improvement of perioperative outcomes. International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2019-000672
Cela, V., Sergiampietri, C., Rosa Obino, M., Bifulco, G., Giovanni Artini, P., & Papini, F. (n.d.). Sentinel-lymph-node mapping with indocyanine green in robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for early endometrial cancer: A retrospective analysis. Facts, Views & Vision in ObGyn, 11(4), 323–328.
Corrado, G., Cutillo, G., Pomati, G., Mancini, E., Sperduti, I., Patrizi, L., Saltari, M., Vincenzoni, C., Baiocco, E., & Vizza, E. (2015). Surgical and oncological outcome of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic and abdominal surgery in the management of endometrial cancer. European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO), 41(8), 1074–1081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2015.04.020
Dharia Patel, S. P., Steinkampf, M. P., Whitten, S. J., & Malizia, B. A. (2008). Robotic tubal anastomosis: Surgical technique and cost effectiveness. Fertility and Sterility, 90(4), 1175–1179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.07.1392
Di Marco, D. S., Chow, G. K., Gettman, M. T., & Elliott, D. S. (2004). Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. Urology, 63(2), 373–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.033
Diaz-Arrastia, C., Jurnalov, C., Gomez, G., & Townsend, C. (2002). Laparoscopic hysterectomy using a computer-enhanced surgical robot. Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 16(9), 1271–1273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8523-5
Doğan, S., & Şi̇Mşek, T. (2016). Robotic Surgery in Gynecology. Akdeniz Medical Journal, 2(1), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.17954/amj.2016.36
Echt, M. L., Finan, M. A., Hoffman, M. S., Kline, R. C., Roberts, W. S., & Fiorica, J. V. (1999). Detection of sentinel lymph nodes with lymphazurin in cervical, uterine, and vulvar malignancies. Southern Medical Journal, 92(2), 204–208. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007611-199902000-00008
Falcone, T., Goldberg, J., Garcia-Ruiz, A., Margossian, H., & Stevens, L. (1999). Full Robotic Assistance for Laparoscopic Tubal Anastomosis: A Case Report. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 9(1), 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.1999.9.107
Falcone, T., Goldberg, J. M., Margossian, H., & Stevens, L. (2000). Robotic-assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis: A human pilot study. Fertility and Sterility, 73(5), 1040–1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00423-4
Gaia, G., Holloway, R. W., Santoro, L., Ahmad, S., Di Silverio, E., & Spinillo, A. (2010). Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer compared with traditional laparoscopic and laparotomy approaches: A systematic review. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 116(6), 1422–1431. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f74153
Ghomi, A., Kramer, C., Askari, R., Chavan, N. R., & Einarsson, J. I. (2012). Trendelenburg Position in Gynecologic Robotic-Assisted Surgery. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 19(4), 485–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2012.03.019
Gobern, J. M., Rosemeyer, C. J., Barter, J. F., & Steren, A. J. (2013). Comparison of Robotic, Laparoscopic, and Abdominal Myomectomy in a Community Hospital. JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, 17(1), 116–120. https://doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13517013317473
Güngör, M., Afşar, S., Özbaşlı, E., & Genim, C. E. (2016). The robotic metroplasty in a patient with hybrid septate variant anomaly. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 10(3), 271–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-016-0563-2
Hudson, C. O., Northington, G. M., Lyles, R. H., & Karp, D. R. (2014). Outcomes of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, 20(5), 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000070
Kalan, S., Chauhan, S., Coelho, R. F., Orvieto, M. A., Camacho, I. R., Palmer, K. J., & Patel, V. R. (2010). History of robotic surgery. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 4(3), 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-010-0202-2
Keckstein, J., Becker, C. M., Canis, M., Feki, A., Grimbizis, G. F., Hummelshoj, L., Nisolle, M., Roman, H., Saridogan, E., Tanos, V., Tomassetti, C., Ulrich, U. A., Vermeulen, N., & De Wilde, R. L. (2020). Recommendations for the surgical treatment of endometriosis. Part 2: Deep endometriosis . Human Reproduction Open, 2020(1), hoaa002. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoaa002
Kim, C., Campbell, B., & Ferrer, F. (2008). Robotic sigmoid vaginoplasty: A novel technique. Urology, 72(4), 847–849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2008.04.004
Kwoh, Y. S., Hou, J., Jonckheere, E. A., & Hayati, S. (1988). A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 35(2), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1109/10.1354
Lane, T. (2018). A short history of robotic surgery. The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 100(6_sup), 5–7. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.supp1.5
Lanfranco, A. R., Castellanos, A. E., Desai, J. P., & Meyers, W. C. (2004). Robotic Surgery. Annals of Surgery, 239(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000103020.19595.7d
Levenback, C., Burke, T. W., Gershenson, D. M., Morris, M., Malpica, A., & Ross, M. I. (1994). Intraoperative lymphatic mapping for vulvar cancer. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 84(2), 163–167.
Mäenpää, M. M., Nieminen, K., Tomás, E. I., Laurila, M., Luukkaala, T. H., & Mäenpää, J. U. (2016). Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: A randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 215(5), 588.e1-588.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.005
Magrina, J. F., Kho, R. M., Weaver, A. L., Montero, R. P., & Magtibay, P. M. (2008). Robotic radical hysterectomy: Comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecologic Oncology, 109(1), 86–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.01.011
Marescaux, J., Leroy, J., Gagner, M., Rubino, F., Mutter, D., Vix, M., Butner, S. E., & Smith, M. K. (2001). Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature, 413(6854), 379–380. https://doi.org/10.1038/35096636
Margossian, H., & Falcone, T. (2001). Robotically Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Adnexal Surgery. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 11(3), 161–165. https://doi.org/10.1089/10926420152389314
Marie Fidela R Paraiso, MD, FACOG, FPMRS & Tommaso Falcone, MD, FRCSC, FACOG. (2020). Robot-assisted laparoscopy. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/robot-assisted-laparoscopy?search=robotic%20hysterectomy&source=search_result&selectedTitle=2~22&usage_type=default&display_rank=2
Naughton, J. D. (1984). Futurology and robots: Karel Čaper’s R.U.R. Renaissance and Modern Studies, 28(1), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735788409366477
Nezhat, C., Lewis, M., Kotikela, S., Veeraswamy, A., Saadat, L., Hajhosseini, B., & Nezhat, C. (2010). Robotic versus standard laparoscopy for the treatment of endometriosis. Fertility and Sterility, 94(7), 2758–2760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.031
Nezhat, F., Yadav, J., Rahaman, J., Gretz, H., & Cohen, C. (2008). Analysis of survival after laparoscopic management of endometrial cancer. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 15(2), 181–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2007.10.006
Nygaard, I. E., McCreery, R., Brubaker, L., Connolly, A., Cundiff, G., Weber, A. M., Zyczynski, H., & Network, P. F. D. (2004). Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy: A Comprehensive Review. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 104(4), 805–823. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000139514.90897.07
Olive, D. L., Parker, W. H., Cooper, J. M., & Levine, R. L. (2000). The AAGL classification system for laparoscopic hysterectomy. Classification committee of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, 7(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1074-3804(00)80004-3
O’Malley, D. M., Smith, B., & Fowler, J. M. (2015). The role of robotic surgery in endometrial cancer. Journal of Surgical Oncology, 112(7), 761–768. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23988
Paul, H. A., Bargar, W. L., Mittlestadt, B., Musits, B., Taylor, R. H., Kazanzides, P., Zuhars, J., Williamson, B., & Hanson, W. (1992). Development of a Surgical Robot for Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®, 285, 57–66.
Pugin, F., Bucher, P., & Morel, P. (2011). History of robotic surgery: From AESOP® and ZEUS® to da Vinci®. Journal of Visceral Surgery, 148(5, Supplement), e3–e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2011.04.007
Ramirez, P. T., Adams, S., Boggess, J. F., Burke, W. M., Frumovitz, M. M., Gardner, G. J., Havrilesky, L. J., Holloway, R., Lowe, M. P., Magrina, J. F., Moore, D. H., Soliman, P. T., & Yap, S. (2012). Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology consensus statement: Developed by the Society of Gynecologic Oncology’s Clinical Practice Robotics Task Force. Gynecologic Oncology, 124(2), 180–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.11.006
Robot-Assisted Surgery for Noncancerous Gynecologic Conditions. (n.d.). Retrieved February 15, 2022, from https://www.acog.org/en/clinical/clinical-guidance/committee-opinion/articles/2020/09/robot-assisted-surgery-for-noncancerous-gynecologic-conditions
Rodgers, A. K., Goldberg, J. M., Hammel, J. P., & Falcone, T. (2007). Tubal anastomosis by robotic compared with outpatient minilaparotomy. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 109(6), 1375–1380. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000264591.43544.0f
Saxena, A. K. (2009). Developments in Robotic Systems. In A. K. Saxena & M. E. Höllwarth (Eds.), Essentials of Pediatric Endoscopic Surgery (pp. 499–502). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78387-9_72
Sert, B. M., & Abeler, V. M. (2006). Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (Piver type III) with pelvic node dissection—Case report. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, 27(5), 531–533.
Sert, B. M., Boggess, J. F., Ahmad, S., Jackson, A. L., Stavitzski, N. M., Dahl, A. A., & Holloway, R. W. (2016). Robot-assisted versus open radical hysterectomy: A multi-institutional experience for early-stage cervical cancer. European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO), 42(4), 513–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2015.12.014
Sinno, A. K., & Fader, A. N. (2014). Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology. Fertility and Sterility, 102(4), 922–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.08.020
Sözen, H., & Özkan, Z. G. (2017). Sentinel Lymph Node Procedures in Gynecological Malignancies. Nuclear Medicine Seminars, 3(2), 140–150. https://doi.org/10.4274/nts.2017.014
Swenson, C. W., Kamdar, N. S., Harris, J. A., Uppal, S., Campbell, D. A., & Morgan, D. M. (2016). Comparison of Robotic and Other Minimally-Invasive Routes of Hysterectomy for Benign Indications. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 215(5), 650.e1-650.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.027
Walker, J. L., Piedmonte, M. R., Spirtos, N. M., Eisenkop, S. M., Schlaerth, J. B., Mannel, R. S., Barakat, R., Pearl, M. L., & Sharma, S. K. (2012). Recurrence and Survival After Random Assignment to Laparoscopy Versus Laparotomy for Comprehensive Surgical Staging of Uterine Cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 30(7), 695–700. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.38.8645
Walker, J. L., Piedmonte, M. R., Spirtos, N. M., Eisenkop, S. M., Schlaerth, J. B., Mannel, R. S., Spiegel, G., Barakat, R., Pearl, M. L., & Sharma, S. K. (2009). Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 27(32), 5331–5336. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3248
Wang, T., Tang, H., Xie, Z., & Deng, S. (2018). Robotic-assisted vs. laparoscopic and abdominal myomectomy for treatment of uterine fibroids: A meta-analysis. Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies, 27(5), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2018.1442349
Wang, Y., Deng, L., Xu, H., Zhang, Y., & Liang, Z. (2015). Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage cervical cancer. BMC Cancer, 15(1), 928. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1818-4
Wisner, K. P. A., Ahmad, S., & Holloway, R. W. (2017). Indications and techniques for robotic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy with sentinel lymph node mapping in gynecologic oncology. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 45, 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.04.006
Wright, J. D., Ananth, C. V., Lewin, S. N., Burke, W. M., Lu, Y.-S., Neugut, A. I., Herzog, T. J., & Hershman, D. L. (2013). Robotically Assisted vs Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Among Women With Benign Gynecologic Disease. JAMA, 309(7), 689–698. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.186
Yang, J., He, Y., Zhang, X., Wang, Z., Zuo, X., Gao, L., & Hong, L. (2021). Robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Translational Medicine, 9(6), 449. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4347
