Zor İyileşen Yaralar: Yara Ayrışması (Dehisence) ve Tedavisi

Yazarlar

Erdinç Çetinkaya

Özet

Yara ayrışması (dehissans), cerrahi teknikler ve modern teknolojideki gelişmelere rağmen mortalite (%9-50), morbidite ve tedavi maliyetlerini artıran ciddi bir postoperatif komplikasyondur. Genellikle laparotomi gibi batın, toraks veya ortopedik cerrahileri takiben, ameliyattan sonraki 4 ila 14. günlerde (ortalama 8. gün) ortaya çıkar. Nedenleri multifaktöriyel olup hastaya bağlı (ileri yaş, erkek cinsiyet, sigara kullanımı, kontrolsüz diyabet, malnütrisyon, anemi vb.) ve ameliyata bağlı (acil cerrahi, cerrahın tecrübesi, yanlış sütür materyali veya tekniği) risk faktörleri olarak ikiye ayrılır. Ancak en önemli tek risk faktörü, olguların %60'ında görülen yara enfeksiyonudur. Klinik yönetimde değiştirilebilir risk faktörlerinin kontrol altına alınması ve fasyanın kapatılmasında emilmeyen ya da yavaş emilen sürekli monofilament sütür ile 4/1 dikiş/kesi oranı standardına uyulması önerilir. Yara ayrışması geliştiğinde, öncelikle fasyanın sağlamlığı ve apse varlığı kontrol edilir. Tedavide sistemik komorbiditelerin optimizasyonu, nekrotik dokuların uzaklaştırılması, eksüda kontrolü için negatif basınçlı yara tedavisi (NPWT), yüksek biyolojik yük durumunda gümüşlü pansumanlar ve selülit varlığında sistemik antibiyotikler kullanılır.

Wound dehiscence remains a critical postoperative complication that increases mortality (9-50%), morbidity, and healthcare costs despite advancements in surgical techniques and modern technology. It typically occurs following abdominal (such as laparotomy), thoracic, or orthopedic surgeries, manifesting between the 4th and 14th postoperative days, with an average onset on the 8th day. Its etiology is multifactorial, categorized into patient-related factors (advanced age, male gender, smoking, uncontrolled diabetes, malnutrition, anemia, etc.) and procedure-related factors (emergency surgery, surgeon's experience, inappropriate suture material, or technique). Notably, wound infection is the single most significant risk factor, present in 60% of cases. Clinical management emphasizes controlling modifiable risk factors and adhering to the 4:1 suture-to-wound length ratio using non-absorbable or slowly absorbable continuous monofilament sutures for fascial closure. When dehiscence occurs, fascial integrity and the presence of an abscess are evaluated first. Treatment focuses on optimizing systemic comorbidities, debriding necrotic tissue, utilizing negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for exudate control, applying silver dressings for high bioburden, and administering systemic antibiotics in the presence of cellulitis.

Referanslar

Sandy-Hodgetts K, Carville K, Leslie GD. Determining risk factors for surgical wound dehiscence; a literatüre review. International Wound Journal 2015;12:265-275

van Ramshorst GH, Nieuwenhuizen J, Hop WC, Arends P, Boom J, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Abdominal wound dehiscence in adults: development and validation of a risk model. World J Surg 2010;34:20–7

Gallina FT, Melis E, Forcella D, Facciolo F. Sternal wound dehiscence after median sternotomy: An alternative closure technique. J Card Surg. 2021 Jul;36(7):2603-2604.

Jones V, Bale S, Harding K. Acute and chronic wounds. Wound care essentials: Practice principles. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins 2004

Kenig J, Richter P, Żurawska S, Lasek A, Zbierska K. Risk factors for wound dehiscence after laparotomy – clınıcal control trıal. Przegląd Chırurgıczny 2012, 84, 11, 565–573

AksamijaG, Mulabdic A, Rasic I, Aksamija L. Evaluation of risk factors of surgical wound dehiscence in adults after laparotomy. Med Arch. 2016 Oct; 70(5):369-372

Dasari N, Jiang A, Skochdopole A, Chung J, Reece EM, Vorstenbosch J, Winocour S. Updates in Diabetic Wound Healing, Inflammation, and Scarring. Semin Plast Surg. 2021 Aug;35(3):153-158.

Hodgson NC, Malthaner RA, Ostbye T. The search for an ideal method of abdominal fascial closure: A meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2000;231:436-45

Ceydeli A, Rucinski J, Wise L. Finding the best abdominal closure: an evidence-based review of the literatüre. Curr Surg 2005;62:220-5

Sajid MS, Parampalli U, Baig MK, McFall MR. A systematic review on the effectiveness of slowly-absorbable versus non- absorbable sutures for abdominal fascial closure following laparotomy. Int J Surg 2011; 9:615-25

Kean J. The effects of smoking on the wound healing process. J Wound Care 2010;19:5-8

Yılmaz KB, Akıncı M, Doğan L, Karaman N, Özaslan C, Atalay C. A prospective evaluation of the risk factors for development of wound dehiscence and incisional hernia. Ulusal Cer Derg 2013;29:25-30

Doughty DB, Faan C. Preventing and managing surgical wound dehiscence. Home Healthcare Nurse 2004;22:6

Porfidia R, Grimaldi S, Ciolli MG, Picarella P. Treatment of Wound Dehiscence Utilizing Negative Pressure Wound Therapy With Instillation and Dwell Time in Emergency Abdominal Surgery: A Step-by-step Closure Protocol. Wounds 2020 Dec;32(12):E114-E119.

Boland PA, Kelly ME, Donlon NE, Bolger JC, Mehigan BJ, McCormick PH, Larkin JO. Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy for closed laparotomy wounds: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials Ir J Med Sci 2021 Feb;190(1):261-267.

Pervical SL, Emanuel C, Cutting KF, Williams DW. Microbiology of the skin and the role of biofilms in infection. Int Wound J 2012;9:14-32

Sayfalar

165-168

Yayınlanan

4 Kasım 2022

Lisans

Lisans