GETAT: Yara Tedavisinde Uygulanan Geleneksel Yöntemler: Larva Debridman Tedavisi ve Hirudoterapi

Yazarlar

Bayram Çolak
Ayşegül Taylan Özkan
Kosta Y. Mumcuoğlu

Özet

Bu yazı, kronik ve iyileşmeyen yaraların tedavisinde uygulanan geleneksel yöntemlerden Larva Debridman Tedavisi (LDT) ve hirudoterapiyi (tıbbi sülük tedavisi) incelemektedir. LDT, Lucilia sericata türü sineklerin dezenfekte edilmiş larvalarının nekrotik dokuları sağlıklı dokuya zarar vermeden yok etmesi, yarayı dezenfekte etmesi ve granülasyonu indüklemesi esasına dayanır. Larvalar, salgıladıkları proteolitik enzimlerle ölü dokuları eritip bakterileri yok ederek iyileşme sürecini hızlandırır. Hirudoterapi ise Hirudo cinsi sülüklerin aktif kan emmesi ve tükürüklerinde barındırdıkları 100’den fazla biyoaktif maddeyi (antikoagülan hirudin, vazodilatörler vb.) hastaya enjekte etmesiyle uygulanır. Bu yöntem venöz konjesyonu azaltır, lokal kan akışını artırır ve doku oksijenlenmesini iyileştirerek kronik yaraların kapanmasına yardımcı olur. Yazıda, açık yaralarda sülük tedavisi öncesi Aeromonas bakterilerine karşı mutlaka antibiyotik profilaksisine başlanması ve kan parametrelerinin izlenmesi gerektiği vurgulanmaktadır. LDT ve hirudoterapinin diyabetik ayak, basınç ve venöz yetmezlik ülserlerinde ampütasyon riskini ve tedavi maliyetlerini düşüren güvenli, etkili yöntemler olduğu klinik çalışmalarla kanıtlanmıştır. Sonuç olarak, arka plandaki hastalıkların yönetimiyle birlikte, hastanın durumu uygun olduğunda bu iki biyolojik yöntemin kombine olarak birlikte uygulanması önerilmektedir.

This text examines Larva Debridement Therapy (LDT) and hirudotherapy (medicinal leech therapy), which are traditional methods applied in the treatment of chronic and non-healing wounds. LDT is based on the principle that disinfected larvae of the fly species Lucilia sericata destroy necrotic tissues without damaging healthy tissue, disinfect the wound, and induce granulation. Larvae accelerate the healing process by dissolving dead tissues and eliminating bacteria through the proteolytic enzymes they secrete. Hirudotherapy, on the other hand, is applied through the active blood-sucking of Hirudo genus leeches and the injection of more than 100 bioactive substances (such as the anticoagulant hirudin, vasodilators, etc.) contained in their saliva into the patient. This method reduces venous congestion, increases local blood flow, and improves tissue oxygenation, thereby helping to close chronic wounds. The text emphasizes that antibiotic prophylaxis against Aeromonas bacteria must be initiated and blood parameters must be monitored before leech therapy in open wounds. Clinical studies have proven that LDT and hirudotherapy are safe and effective methods that reduce the risk of amputation and treatment costs in diabetic foot, pressure, and venous insufficiency ulcers. Consequently, along with the management of underlying diseases, it is recommended to apply these two biological methods in combination whenever the patient's condition is suitable.

Referanslar

Sherman RA, Wyle F, Vulpe M. Maggot therapy for treating pressure ulcers in spinal cord injury patients. J Spinal Cord Med. 1995; 18(2): 71-74.

Mumcuoglu KY, Miller J, Mumcuoglu M, Friger M, Tarshis M. Destruction of bacteria in the digestive tract of the maggot of Lucilia sericata (Diptera-Calliphoridae). J Med Entomol 2001; 148: 14-23.

Nigam Y, Bexfield A, Thomas S, Ratcliffe NA. Maggot therapy: the science and implication for CAM. Part 2-Maggots combat infection. eCAM 2006; 3: 303-308.

Taylan Özkan A, Mumcuoğlu KY. Kronik venöz ülserli bir olgunun maggot debridman tedavisi ile sağaltımı. Türk Hij Den Biyol Derg. 2007;64(1):31-34.

Sherman RA, Mumcuoglu KY, Grassberger M, Tantawi TI. Maggot Therapy. In: Grassberger M, Ronald A. Sherman Olga S. Gileva, Christopher M.H. Kim, Kosta Y. Mumcuoglu, eds. Biotherapy-History, Principles and Practice, A Practical Guide to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Disease using Living Organisms. 2 th ed. Dordrecht Heidelberg New York London: Springer; 2013.

T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı. 2014. Geleneksel ve Tamamlayıcı Tıp Uygulamaları Yönetmeliği. 27.10.2014 Tarihli ve 29158 Sayılı Resmi Gazete. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2014/10/20141027-3.htm (Erişim: 10.10.2021)

Graninger M, Grasberger M, Galehr E, et al. Biosurgical debridment facilitates healing of chronic skin ulcers. Arch Intern Med. 2002; 162 (16): 1906-7.

Tanyuksel M, Araz E, Dundar K, Uzun G, Gumus T, Alten B, Saylam F, Ozkan AT, Mumcuoglu KM. Maggot debridement therapy in the treatment of chronic wounds in a military hospital setup in Turkey. Dermatology 2005; 210: 115-118.

Chernin E. Surgical maggots. South Med J. 1986; 79: 1143-1145.

Baer W. The treatment of chronic osteomiyelitis with the maggot (larva of the blow fly). J Bone Joint Surg. 1931; 13: 438-475.

Mumcuoğlu KY, Özkan AT. Süpüratif kronik yaraların maggot debridman tedavisi. Türkiye Parazitol Derg. 2009; 33 (4): 307-315.

Carbonaro D. Medical Maggots™ (Maggot Therapy, Maggot Debridement Therapy, LT, Biotherapy, Biosurgery, Biodebridement, Larval Therapy), Biology of flies and maggots. https://www.monarchlabs.com/LT (Erişim: 23.09.2020).

Tantawi TI, William KA, Villet MH. An accidental but safe and effective use of Lucilia cuprina (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in maggot debridement therapy in Alexandria, Egypt. J Med Entomol. 2010; 47: 491-494.

Anderson GS. Minimum and maximum development rates of some forensically important Calliphoridae (Diptera). J Forensic Sci. 2000; 45: 824-832.

Apperson CS, Arends JJ, Baker JR, Carter CC, Payne CS. Blow flies. Insect and Related Pests of Man and Animal. 2011. http://ipm.ncsu.edu/ag369/notes/blow_flies.html.

Mumcuoglu KY, Ingber A, Gilead L, et al. Maggot therapy fort he treatment of intractable wounds. Int J Dermatol. 1999; 8: 623-627.

Wollina U, Liebold K, Schmidt WD, Hartman M, Fassler D. Biosurgery supports granulation and debridement in chronic wounds-clinical data and remittance spectroscopy measurement. Int J Dermatol. 2002; 41: 635-639.

Bowling FL, Salgami EV, Boulton AJ. Larval therapy: a novel treatment in eliminating methicillin-resistant Stapylococcus aureus from diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 370-371.

Malekian A, Djavid GE, Akbarzadeh K, Soltandallah M, Rassi Y, Rafinejad J, et al. Efficacy of maggot therapy on Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in diabetic foot ulcers. A randomized controlled trial. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2019; 46(1): 25-29.

Thomas S, Wynn K, Fowler T, Jones M. The effect of containment on the properties of sterile maggots. Br J Nurs. 2002; 11: 21-28.

Steenvoorde P, Jacobi CE, Oskam J. Maggot debridement therapy: free-range or contained? An in vivo study. Adv Skin Wound Care 2005; 18: 430-435.

Blake FA, Abromeit N, Bubenheim M, Li L, Schmelzle R. The biosurgical wound debridement: experimental investigation of efficiency and practicability. Wound Repair Regen. 2007; 15: 756-761.

Mumcuoglu KY, Davidson E, Avidan A, Gilead L. Pain related to maggot debridement therapy. Journal of Wound Care 2012; 21 (8): 400-405.

Moran-Bozer B, Uslu U, Mumcuoglu KY, Taylan-Ozkan A. Evaluation of Lucilia sericata and its excretion/secretion products in terms of biocompatibility. 21st Congress of Parasitology, 11-15 October 2021, Didim-Aydın, #: SB45.

Church JCT. Larval intervention in the chronic wound. EWMA J. 2001; 1(2): 10-13

Habson RP. On an enzyme from blow-fly larvae (Lucilia sericata) which digests collagen in alkaline solution. Biochem J. 1931; 25: 1458-1463.

Ziffren SE. Heist HE, May SC, Womack A. The secretion of callagenase by maggots and its implication. Ann Surgery 1957; 138: 932-934.

Horobin AJ, Shakesheff KM, Woodrow S, Robinson C, Pritchard DI. Maggots and wound healing: an investigation of the effects of secretions from Lucilia sericata larvae upon interactions between human dermal fibroblasts and extracellular matrix components. Br J Dermatol. 2003; 148(5): 923-933.

Pavillard ER, Wright EA. An antibiotic from maggots. Nature 1957; 152: 916-917.

Lappin-Scott HM. Bacterial-maggot interactions in wound therapy. Third International Conference on Biotherapy, Jerusalem, Israel, May 24-27, 1998, p. 21.

Thomas S, Andrews AM, Hay NP, Bourgoise S. The anti-microbial activity of maggot secretions: results of a preliminary study. J. Tissue Viability 1999; 9: 127-132. doi: 10.1016/s0965-206x(99)80032-1.

Huberman L, Gollop N, Mumcuoglu KY, Block C, Galun R. Antibacterial properties of whole body extracts and haemolymph of Lucilia sericata maggots. J Wound Care. 2007a;16(3): 123-7. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2007.16.3.27011

Huberman L, Gollop N, Mumcuoglu KY, Breuer E, Bhusare SR, Shai Y, Galun R. Antibacterial substances of low molecular weight isolated from the blowfly, Lucilia sericata. Med Vet Entomol. 2007b; 21(2): 127-131. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2007.00668.x.

Cazander G, van Veen KE, Bouwman LH, Bernarda AT, Jukema GN. The influence of maggot excreations on PAO1 biofilm formation on different biomaterials. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 467: 536-545.

Peachter EA, Sherman RA. Maggot therapy: the surgical matamorphosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983; 72: 567-570.

Horobin AJ, Shakesheff KM, Pritchard DI. Maggots and wound healing: an investigation of the effects of secretions from Lucilia sericata larvae upon the migration of human dermal fibroblast over a fibronectin-coated surface. Wound Rep Reg. 2005; 13: 422-433.

Horobin AJ, Shakesheff KM, Pritchard DI. Promotion of human dermal fibroblast migration, matrix remodelling and modification of fibroblast morphology within a novel 3d model by Lucilia sericata larval secretions. J Invest Dermatol. 2006; 126: 1410-1418.

Zhang Z, Wang S, Diao Y, Zhang J, Lv D. Fatty accid extracts from Lucilia sericata larvae promote murine cutaneous wound healing by engiogenic activity. Lipids Health Dis. 2010; 9: 24.

Okan D, Woo K, Ayello EA, Sibbald RG. The Role of Moisture Balance in Wound Healing. Advances in Skin & Wound Care 2007; 20: 39-53.

Koh JH, Miller C, McKenzie G, et al. The relationship between periwound skin condition and venous leg ulcer chronicity. Wound Practice and Research. 2015; 23:2, 82-89.

Haryanto H, Arisandi D, Suriadi S, et al. Relationship between maceration and wound healing on diabetic foot ulcers in Indonesia: A prospective study. Int Wound J. 2017; 14(3): 516–522.

Aydemir EH. Dermatolojide Yerel Tedavi. Tüzün Y, Kotoğyan A, Aydemir EH, Baransü O, editor. Dermatoloji. 2. Baskı. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp; 1994: 721-733.

Griffiths WAD, Wilkinson JD. Topical Therapy. In: Champion RH, Burton JL, Burns DA, Breathnach SM eds. Textbook of Dermatology. 6 th ed. London: Blackwell; 1998: 3519-3565.

De Souza A, Strober BE. Principles of topical therapy. In: Goldsmith LA, Katz SI, et al eds. Fitzpatrick’s Dermatology in General Medicine. 8 th ed. Newyork: Mc Graw Hill; 2012. P. 2644-2651.

Tian X, Liang XM, Song GM, Zhao Y, Yang XL. Maggot debridement therapy for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a meta-analysis. J Wound Care 2013; 22: 462-469.

Wilasrusmee C, Marjareonrungrung M, Eamkong S, Attia J, Poprom N, Jirasisrithum S, Thakkinstian A. Maggot therapy for chronic ulcer: a retrospective cohort and a meta-analysis. Asian J Surg. 2014; 37(3): 138-147.

Whitaker IS, Twine C, Whitaker MJ, Welck M, Brown CS, Shandall A. Larval therapy from antiquity to the present day: mechanisms of action, clinical applications and future potential. Postgrad Med J. 2007; 83: 409-413.

Gazi U, Taylan-Ozkan A, Mumcuoglu KY. The effect of Lucilia sericata larval excretion/secretion (ES) products on cellular responses in wound healing. Med Vet Entomol. 2021 Sep;35(3):257-266.

Ayello EA, Cuddigan JE. Debridement: Controlling the necrotic/cellular burden. Adv Skin Wound Care 2004; 17(2): 66-75.

Mosti G, Mattaliano V. The debridement of chronic leg ulcers by means of a new, fluidjet-based device. Wounds 2006; 18(8): 227-237.

Sherman RA. Maggot therapy for treating diabetic foot ulcers unresponsive to conventional therapy. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 254-257.

Edwards L, Stapley S. Debridement of diabetic foot ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003556.pub2.

Mudge E, Price P, Walkley N, Harding KG. A randomized controlled trial of larval therapy for the debridement of leg ulcers: results of a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open, observer blind, parallel group study. Wound Repair Regen. 2014; 22(1): 43-51.

Paul AG, Ahmad NW, Lee HL, Ariff AM, Saranum M, Naicker AS, Osman Z. Maggot debridement therapy with lucilia cuprina: a comparison with conventional debridement in diabetic foot ulcers. Int Wound J. 2009; 6(1): 39-46.

Armstrong DG, Salas PShort B, et al. Maggot therapy in “lower-extremity hospice” wound care: fewer amputations and more antibiotic-free days. J Am Podiat Med Assoc. 2005; 95: 254-257.

Sun X, Jiang K, Chen J, Wu J, Lu H, Wang J. A systematic review of maggot debridement therapy for chronically infected wounds and ulcers. Int J Infect Dis. 2014; 25: 32-37.

Soares MO, Iglesias CP, Bland JM, et al. Ven US II team. Cost effectiveness analysis of larval therapy for leg ulcers. BMJ 2009; 338: b825. Doi: 10.1136/bmj.b825.

Kawabata T, Mitsui H, Yokota K, Shino KI, Guma KO, Sano S. Induction of antibacterial activity in larvae of the blowfly Lucilia sericata by an infected environment. Med Vet Entomol. 2010; 24: 375-381.

Bennett H, Sewell B, Anderson P, Rai MK, Goyal R, Phillips C. Cost-effectiveness of interventions for chronic wound debridement: an evaluation in search of data. Wounds UK 2013; 9(4): 3-11.

Eldor A, Orevi M, Rigbi M. The role of the leech in medical therapeutics. Blood Rev. 1996; 10(4): 201-209. doi: 10.1016/s0268-960x(96)90000-4.

Rigbi M, Orevi M, Eldor A. Platelet aggregation and coagulation inhibitors in leech saliva and their roles in leech therapy. Sem Thromb Hemostasis 1996; 22(3): 273–278.

Hildebrandt JP, Lemke S. Small bite, large impact-saliva and salivary molecules in the medicinal leech, Hirudo medicinalis. Naturwissenschaften 2011; 98(12): 995-1008. doi: 10.1007/s00114-011-0859-z.

Fritz H, Oppitz KH, Gebhardt M, Oppitz I, Werle E, Marx R. On the presence of a trypsin-plasmin inhibitor in hirudin. Hoppe-Seyler’s Zeitschrift fuer Physiologische Chemie 1969; 350(1): 91-92.

Seemueller U, Meier M, Ohlsson K, Muller H P, Fritz H. Isolation and characterisation of a low molecular weight inhibitor (of chymotrypsin and human granulocytic elastase and cathepsin G) from leeches. Hoppe-Seyler’s Zeitschrift fur Physiologische Chemie. 1977; 358(9): 1105–1117.

Seemuller U, Dodt J, Fink E. et al. Proteinase inhibitors of the leech Hirudo medicinalis (hirudins, bdellins, eglins). In: Barettand AJ, Salvesen G, eds. Proteinase Inhibitors. New York: Elsevier; 1986. p. 337–359.

Sollner C, Mentele R, Eckerskorn C, Fritz H, Sommerhoff CP. Isolation and characterization of hirustasin, an antistasin-type serine-proteinase inhibitor from the medical leech Hirudo medicinalis. Eur J Biochem. 1994; 219(3): 937–943.

Baskova IP, Khalil S, Nartikova VF, Paskhina TS. Inhibition of plasma kallikrein, kininase and kinin-like activities of preparations from the medicinal leeches. Thrombosis Res. 1992; 67(6): 721–730.

Hovingh P, Linker A. Hyaluronidase activity in leeches (Hirudinea).Comp Biochem Physiol B 1999; 124(3): 319–326.

Gileva OS, Mumcuoglu KY. Hirudotherapy. In: Grassberger M, Sherman RA, Gileva OS, Kim CMH, Mumcuoglu KY, eds. Biotherapy - History, Principles and Practice: A Practical Guide to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Disease using Living Organisms. London: Springer; 2013. p. 31-76.

Whitaker IS, Oboumarzouk O, Rozen WM. et al. The efficacy of medicinal leeches in plastic and reconstructive surgery: a systematic review of 277 reported clinical cases. Microsurgery 2012; 32(3): 240–250.

Bapat RD, Acharya BS, Juvekar S, Dahanukar SA. Leech therapy for complicated varicose veins. Indian J Med Res. 1998; 107: 281-284.

Gilyova OS. Hirudotherapy and the skin. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Biotherapy, Wurzburg, Germany, June 29-30, 2000, pp 9–10. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B38l-Vltz5yzOHJSMFlsQmZyYTA/view?resourcekey=0-OE1Y3wP9Br9OSOxIcEDLrw (Erişim: 19.09.2021).

Na HJ. The Effects of live leech (Hirudo medicinalis) therapy on diabetic foot: a clinical case report. Korean J Orient Med. 2003; 24: 136-138.

Zarnigar AA. Clinical efficacy of leech therapy in varicose ulcer. Unani Res J. 2011; 1: 3-7.

Amarprakash PD. Case study of leech application in diabetic foot ulcer. Int J Res Ayurveda Pharm. 2012; 3: 748-751.

Kumar S, Dobos GJ, Rampp T. Clinical significance of leech therapy in Indian medicine. J Evid-based Compl Altern Med. 2013; 18(2): 152-158.

Zaidi SA. Unani treatment and leech therapy saved the diabetic foot of a patient from amputation. Int Wound J. 2016; 13: 263-264.

Samaranayake GVP, Pushpakumara AAJJ, Waliwita WAL. Case study of leech application in varicose ulcer. Int J Scient Technol Res. 2016; 5(5): 260-262.

Nair HKR, Ahmad NW, Lee HL, Ahmad N, Othamn S, Mokhtar NSHM, Chong SSY.. Hirudotherapy in wound healing. Int J Low Extrem Wounds 2020 Aug 20:1534734620948299. doi: 10.1177/1534734620948299.

Laila S, Fatemeh E, Lida B. Treatment of diabetic foot ulcer with medicinal leech therapy and honey curcumin dressing: a case report. Trad Med Res. 2019; 4(6): 338

Mumcuoglu KY, Pidhorz C, Cohen R, Ofek A, Lipton HA. The use of the medicinal leech, Hirudo medicinalis, in the reconstructive plastic surgery. Internet J Plast Surg. 2007; 4(2). doi: 10.5580/3c6.

Mumcuoglu KY, Huberman L, Cohen R, Temper V, Adler A, Galun R, Block C. Elimination of symbiotic Aeromonas spp. from the intestinal tract of the medicinal leech, Hirudo medicinalis using ciprofloxacin feeding. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010; 16(6): 563–567.

Whitaker IS, Kamya C, Azzopardi EA, Graf J, Kon M, Lineaweaver WC. Preventing infective complications following leech therapy: is practice keeping pace with current research? Microsurgery 2009; 29(8): 619-625. doi: 10.1002/micr.20666.

Mumcuoglu KY. Recommendations for the use of leeches in reconstructive plastic surgery. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2014. doi.org/10.1155/2014/205929

Wilmer A, Slater K, Yip J, Carr N, Grant J. The role of leech water sampling in choice of prophylactic antibiotics in medical leech therapy. Microsurgery 2013; 33: 301–304.

Sağlam N. Sülük biyolojisi ve yetiştirme teknikleri, ticari balık türlerinin biyolojisi ve yetiştirme teknikleri hizmetiçi eğitim semineri. Tarım ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı, Tarımsal Üretim ve Geliştirme Gn. Md. Su Ürünleri Daire Başkanlığı, 1-5 Mayıs, 2000, Ankara, pp. 51-56.

Hoşnuter M, Demircan N, Unalacak M, Kargı E, Aktunc E, Babuccu O. Modern tıbbın yeniden keşfettiği bir alternatif tedavi metodu: Hirudoterapi. Turk Aile Hek Derg. 2003; 7: 177-179.

Sağlam N. Tıbbi suluk Hirudo medicinalis’in (L. 1758, Hirudinidae) incelenmesi. Sumder Su Urunleri Muhendisleri Derneği Derg 1998; 1: 28-30.

Sağlam N. Sulukler, kullanım alanları ve ekonomik onemleri. Fırat Uni Fırat Haber. 2005; pp10

Okka B. Hirudotherapy from past to present. Eur J Basic Med Sci. 2013; 3(3): 61-65.

Yapici AK, Durmus M, Tanyuksel M, Turkkan S, Tuzun, HY, Srsenishvili A. Hirudo medicinalis - historical and biological background and their role in microsurgery: Review article. Hand Microsurg. 2017; 6: 34-38. doi:10.5455/handmicrosurg.217838.

Şenel E, Taylan Özkan A, Mumcuoglu KY. Scientometric analysis of medicinal leech therapy. J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2020; 11(4): 534-538. doi: 10.1016/j.jaim.2018.11.006.

Güneren E, Erolu L, Akba H, et al. The use of Hirudo medicinalis in nipple-areolar congestion. Ann Plast Surg. 2000; 45: 679-681.

Akyürek M, Safak T, Keçik A. Microsurgical ear replantation without venous repair: failure of development of venous channels despite patency of arterial anastomosis for 14 days. Ann Plast Surg. 2001; 46: 439-443.

Guven H, Akbas H. The use of leeches in the management of a ring avulsion injury. Eur J Plast Surg. 2002; 25: 162-164.

Gideroglu K, Yildirim S, Akan M, et al. Immediate use of medicinal leeches to salvage venous congested reverse pedicled neurocutaneous flaps. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2003; 37: 277-282.

Tuncali D, Terzioglu A, Cigsar B, et al. The value of medical leeches in the treatment of class IIC ring avulsion injuries: report of 2 cases. J Hand Surg. 2004; 29: 943-946.

Arusan S, Bayar B, Gödekmerdan A, Sağlam N. Olgu sunumu: Mikro cerrahiye yardımcı bir metot, hirudoterapi. Turkiye Parazitol Derg. 2013; 37(2): 154-156. doi: 10.5152/tpd.2013.34.

Kalender ME, Comez G, Sevinc A, et al. Leech therapy for symptomatic relief of cancer pain. Pain Med. 2010; 11: 443-445.

Ikizceli I, Avsarogulları L, Sozuer E, Yurumez Y, Akdur O. Bleeding due to a medicinal leech bite. Emerg Med J. 2005; 22: 458-460.

Zengin S, Yarbil P, Kilic H, Al B. Prolonged bleeding due to a medicinal leech bite: another treatment method, primary suture. BMJ Case Reports 2012; 13: 1-4.

Doğan S, Özgün MY, Akman C, Kalafat UM, Tarık OC. Use of primary sutures to stop persistent bleeding due to hirudotherapy. J Emer Med Case Rep. 2016; 7(3): 58-60.

Daye M, Işık B, Kılınç F. Lichen planus due to hirudotherapy. Turkiye Parazitol Derg. 2021; 45(2): 149-152. doi: 10.4274/tpd.galenos.2020.7066.

Uzun G, Ozdemir A, Yildiz S, Tanyuksel M. To suck or not to suck: medicinal leech therapy for lower extremity wounds in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Int Wound J. 2016; 13(3): 429-430. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12304.

Karadag AS, Calka O, Akdeniz N, Cecen I. A case of irritant contact dermatitis with leech. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2011; 30(3): 234-235. doi: 10.3109/15569527.2010.547543.

Sayfalar

311-328

Yayınlanan

4 Kasım 2022

Lisans

Lisans