Torakotomi ve Videotorakoskopik Yaklaşım
Özet
Akciğer rezeksiyonu ameliyatlarında uygulanan torakotomi ve video-yardımlı torakoskopik cerrahi (VATS) yöntemleri, kendilerine özgü teknik özellikler, avantajlar ve dezavantajlar barındırmaktadır. Göğüs cerrahisinde geleneksel olarak en sık tercih edilen posterolateral torakotomi, tüm toraks kavitesine geniş bir erişim ve konvansiyonel aletlerin kullanımını sağlasa da, ekartör kullanımına bağlı olarak yüksek oranda kronik postoperatif ağrı riski taşımaktadır. Buna karşılık minimal invaziv bir yaklaşım olan VATS, kaburgaları ayırmadan küçük insizyonlar, gelişmiş teknolojik ekipmanlar ve özel staplerlar eşliğinde gerçekleştirilmektedir. Literatürdeki veriler, VATS yönteminin torakotomiye kıyasla daha az intraoperatif kanama, daha hafif ağrı, daha kısa hastanede kalış süresi ve daha düşük komplikasyon oranları sunduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Bazı çalışmalar açık yöntemin daha geniş lenf nodu diseksiyonuna imkan tanıdığını belirtse de, VATS sunduğu konfor ve düşük morbidite ile deneyimli merkezlerde ilk seçenek haline gelmiştir. Bununla birlikte, operasyon sırasında oluşabilecek katastrofik komplikasyonlarda acilen açık yönteme geçilebilmesi için cerrahın torakotomi tecrübesine sahip olması hayati önem taşımaktadır.
Thoracotomy and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) represent the two primary approaches in lung resection, each possessing distinct technical features, advantages, and disadvantages. Traditionally preferred in thoracic surgery, posterolateral thoracotomy provides comprehensive exposure of the thoracic cavity and accommodates conventional instrumentation, yet it carries a significant risk of chronic postoperative pain due to rib-spreading. Conversely, VATS is a minimally invasive method performed without rib retraction through small incisions, utilizing advanced videoscopic equipment and specialized staplers. Clinical literature indicates that VATS is associated with reduced intraoperative bleeding, less postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, and lower complication rates compared to open thoracotomy. Although a limited number of studies suggest that open thoracotomy might offer a more extensive lymph node dissection, VATS has become the preferred approach in experienced centers due to its short-term recovery and morbidity benefits. Nevertheless, maintaining proficiency in thoracotomy remains critical for surgeons to safely manage potential intraoperative catastrophic complications that require immediate open conversion.
Referanslar
Koizumi K. The revolution of thoracotomy for lung cancer surgery. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;13:228-235.
Lewis RJ, Caccavale RJ, Sisler GE, et al. One hundred consecutive patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;54:421-426.
Roviaro G, Rebuffat C, Varoli F, et al. Videoendoscopic pulmonary lobectomy for cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1992;2:244-247.
Evman, RS. (2015) Torasik İnsizyonlar. Mustafa Yüksel, Akın Eraslan Balcı (Ed.), Göğüs cerrahisi: "Kırmızı kitap" içinde (s. 143-151). İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri
Li S, Feng Z, Wu L, et al. Analysis of 11 trials comparing muscle-sparing with posterolateral thoracotomy. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;62:344-352.
Elshiekh MA, Lo TT, Shipolini AR, et al. Does muscle-sparing thoracotomy as opposed to posterolateral thoracotomy result in better recovery? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013;16:60-67.
Abbas AE. Surgical management of lung cancer: History, evolution, and modern advances. Curr Oncol Rep. 2018;20:98-98.
Landreneau RJ, Mack MJ, Hazelrigg SR, et al. Prevalence of chronic pain after pulmonary resection by thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracic surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;107:1079-1085; discussion 1085-1076.
Swanson SJ, Herndon JE, 2nd, D'Amico TA, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: Report of calgb 39802--a prospective, multi-institution feasibility study. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:4993-4997.
Hanna JM, Berry MF, D'Amico TA. Contraindications of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical lobectomy and determinants of conversion to open. J Thorac Dis. 2013;5 Suppl 3:S182-189.
Gonzalez-Rivas D, Yang Y, Stupnik T, et al. Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic bronchovascular, tracheal and carinal sleeve resections†. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;49 Suppl 1:i6-16.
Lyscov A, Obukhova T, Ryabova V, et al. Double-sleeve and carinal resections using the uniportal vats technique: A single centre experience. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8:S235-241.
Lacin T, Batirel HF, Ozer K, et al. Safety of a thermal vessel sealer on main pulmonary vessels. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007;31:482-485; discussion 485.
Tashima T, Yamashita J, Nakano S, et al. Comparison of video-assisted minithoracotomy and standard open thoracotomy for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2005;14:203-208.
Shiraishi T, Shirakusa T, Miyoshi T, et al. A completely thoracoscopic lobectomy/segmentectomy for primary lung cancer--technique, feasibility, and advantages. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;54:202-207.
Muraoka M, Oka T, Akamine S, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy reduces the morbidity after surgery for stage i non-small cell lung cancer. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;54:49-55.
Cattaneo SM, Park BJ, Wilton AS, et al. Use of video-assisted thoracic surgery for lobectomy in the elderly results in fewer complications. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:231-235; discussion 235-236.
Nicastri DG, Wisnivesky JP, Litle VR, et al. Thoracoscopic lobectomy: Report on safety, discharge independence, pain, and chemotherapy tolerance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135:642-647.
Walker WS, Leaver HA. Immunologic and stress responses following video-assisted thoracic surgery and open pulmonary lobectomy in early stage lung cancer. Thorac Surg Clin. 2007;17:241-249.
Xue Y, Wang YY, Zhang K, et al. A study of complete video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy in treatment of elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer: Curative effect and impact on clinical prognosis. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2015;73:399-404.
Bendixen M, Jørgensen OD, Kronborg C, Aet al. Postoperative pain and quality of life after lobectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or anterolateral thoracotomy for early stage lung cancer: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:836-844.
Falcoz PE, Puyraveau M, Thomas PA, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open lobectomy for primary non-small-cell lung cancer: A propensity-matched analysis of outcome from the european society of thoracic surgeon database. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;49:602-609.
Ye B, Wang M. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy for non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2019;22:187-193.
Rauma V, Andersson S, Robinson EM, et al. Thoracotomy and vats surgery in local non-small-cell lung cancer: Differences in long-term health-related quality of life. Clin Lung Cancer. 2019;20:378-383.
Zhang W, Wei Y, Jiang H, et al. Thoracotomy is better than thoracoscopic lobectomy in the lymph node dissection of lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2016;14:290.
