Sporcularda Vücut Kompozisyonunun Değerlendirilmesi ve Fiziksel Performans İle İlişkisi
Özet
Sporcularda vücut kompozisyonunun değerlendirilmesi, antrenman programlarının verimliliğini incelemek, beslenme düzenini optimize etmek ve atletik performansı artırmak açısından büyük bir önem taşımaktadır. Vücut kompozisyonu modelleri iki, üç ve dört bileşenli yaklaşımlar olarak sınıflandırılmakta olup; ölçümler doğrudan (kadavra veya karkas analizleri) ve dolaylı teknikler kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmektedir. Dolaylı değerlendirme yöntemleri arasında hidrodensitometri (su altı tartımı), biyoelektrik empedans analizi (BİA), çift enerjili x-ışını absorpsiyometrisi (DXA), hava değişim pletismografisi (ADP), ultrasonografi ve antropometrik deri kıvrım kalınlığı (skinfold) ölçümleri bulunmaktadır. DXA ve hidrodensitometri sırasıyla üç ve iki bileşenli modellerde altın standart kabul edilmekle birlikte; maliyet, cihaz gereksinimi, pratiklik ve doğruluk oranları yöntem seçiminde belirleyici olmaktadır. Genel olarak sporcularda yüksek yağsız kütle oranı ile düşük vücut yağ yüzdesi hedeflenmektedir. Fazla vücut yağı dikey sıçrama, sprint süresi, çeviklik, anaerobik güç ve maksimal kuvvet gibi temel performans parametreleri üzerinde olumsuz bir etki yaratmaktadır. Spor branşının ve saha pozisyonunun gerektirdiği fiziksel taleplere bağlı olarak ideal vücut kompozisyonu değerleri değişiklik göstermekte, bu nedenle sezonsal takip ve uygun değerlendirme yöntemlerinin kullanımı kritik rol oynamaktadır.
The assessment of body composition in athletes plays a vital role in evaluating training programs, optimizing nutrition strategies, and enhancing athletic performance. Body composition models are categorized into two-, three-, and four-compartment approaches, with evaluations carried out through direct (cadaver or carcass analysis) and indirect techniques. Indirect assessment methods include hydrodensitometry (underwater weighing), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), air displacement plethysmography (ADP), ultrasound, and anthropometric skinfold thickness measurements. While DXA and hydrodensitometry are regarded as gold standards for three- and two-compartment models respectively, factors such as cost, equipment requirements, practicality, and accuracy determine the choice of method. Generally, a high ratio of fat-free mass and a low body fat percentage are desirable criteria for athletes. Excessive body fat negatively impacts key performance parameters such as vertical jump, sprint time, agility, anaerobic power, and maximal strength. Ideal body composition values vary depending on the physical demands of the specific sports discipline and playing position, making seasonal monitoring and the use of appropriate assessment methods critically important.
Referanslar
Akdogan, E, & Güven, B.. Relationship between body composition, agility and vertical jump performance in young female volleyball players. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Sports Sciences, 2021;13(3):352-7.
Aslan, H., Futbolcularda Vücut Kompozisyonunun İncelenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Spor Bilimleri ve Teknolojisi Programı Doktora Tezi, 2014; 3-4.
Bayios, I.A., Bergeles, N.K., Apostolidis, N.G., et al. Anthropometric, body composition and somatotype differences of Greek elite female basketball, volleyball and handball players. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 2006; 46: 271–280.
Boileau, R.A. & Horswill, C.A. (2000). Body composition in sports: Measurement and applications for weight gain and loss. In: Exercise and Sport Science. W.E. Garrett Jr and D.T. Kirkendall, eds. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams &Wilkins, pp. 319–338.
Campa F, Toselli S, Mazzilli M, et al. Assessment of body composition in athletes: A narrative review of available methods with special reference to quantitative and qualitative bioimpedance analysis. Nutrients, 2021;13:1620.
Canbolat, E. Biyoelektrik İmpedans Analizi Parametrelerinden Faz Açısının, Tanısal Kriter Olarak Olası Rolü . Annals of Health Sciences Research, 2018; 7 (1) , 58-65.
Devlin, B.L., Kingsley, M, Leveritt, M.D., et al. Seasonal changes in soccer players’ body composition and dietary intake practices. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2017; 31:3319-3326.
Fields, J.B., Metoyer, C.J., Casey, J.C., et al. Comparison of body composition variables across a large sample of National Collegiate Athletic Association women athletes from 6 competitive sports. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2018; 32(9):2452-2457.
Fosbøl, M.Ø. & Zerahn, B. Contemporary methods of body composition measurement. Clin. Physiol. Funct. Imaging 2014; 35:81–97.
Gomes, A. C., Landers, G. J., Binnie, M. J., et al. Body composition assessment in athletes: Comparison of a novel ultrasound technique to traditional skinfold measures and criterion DXA measure. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2020; 23:(11), 1006-1010.
Hilgemberg-Figueiredo D, Carlos-Dourado A, Reeberg Stanganelli LC, et al. Evaluation of body composition and its relationship with physical fitness in professional soccer players at the beginning of pre-season. Retos. 2021;40:117-125
Kale, M, & Akdoğan, E. Relationships between body composition and anaerobic performance parameters in female handball players. Physical education of students. 2020; 24(5):265-70.
Kocahan T, & Kabak B. Sporcularda vücut kompozisyonunun değerlendirilmesi. Kocahan T, editör. Sporcularda Sağlık ve Performans Ölçme ve Değerlendirme. 1. Baskı. Ankara: Türkiye Klinikleri; 2021. p.29-35.
Lee SY,& Gallagher D. Assessment methods in human body composition. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2008; 11: 566– 572.
Lemos, T., Gallagher D., Current body composition measurement techniques Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes, 2017; 24, (5): 310-314
Lesinski, M., Prieske, O., Helm, N., et al. Effects of soccer training on anthropometry, body composition, and physical fitness during a soccer season in female elite young athletes: A prospective cohort study. Frontiers in Physiology, 2017; 8, 1093.
Lidor, R & Ziv, G. Physical and physiological attributes of female volleyball players—A review. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2010; 24: 1963–1973,
Madic, D., Andrasic, S., Gusic, M., et al. Seasonal body composition variations in adolescent soccer players. International Journal of Morphology, 2018; 36(3),877-80.
Malá, L, Malý, T, Zahalka, et al. Body composition of elite female players in five different sports games. Journal of Human Kinetics, 2015; 45(1), 207-215.
McArdle, W. D., Katch, F. I., & Katch, V. L. (2001). Exercise physiology: Energy, nutrition, and human performance. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Michalsik, L. B., Aagaard, P., & Madsen, K. Technical activity profile and influence of body anthropometry on playing performance in female elite team handball. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2015; 29, 1126–1138.
Milanese, C., Piscitelli, F., Lampis, Cç, et al. Effect of a competitive season on anthropometry and three-compartment body composition in female handball players. Biology of Sport, 2012; 29(3):199–204.
Ostojic, SM. Seasonal alterations in body composition and sprint performance of elite soccer players. J Exerc Physiol. 2003;6:24-27.
Stanforth, P.R., Crim, B.N., Standforth, D, et al. Body composition changes among female NCAA division I athletes across the competitive season and over a multiyear timeframe. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2014; 28: 300–307,
Trexler, E.T., Smith-Ryan, A.E., Mann, J.B., et al. Longitudinal body composition changes in NCAA division I college football players. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2017;31(1):1.
Toombs RJ, Ducher G, Shepherd JA, et al. The impact of recent technological advances on the trueness and precision of DXA to assess body composition. Obesity. 2012;20:30-9.
