Çevresel ve Mesleksel Kimyasallar: Kadınlarda Reprodüktif Sistemde Tehlikeler
Özet
Çevresel ve mesleksel kimyasal kirleticilere prekonsepsiyonel ve prenatal dönemlerde maruz kalmak, kadınların reprodüktif sistemi ve fetüs gelişimi üzerinde kalıcı ve olumsuz etkilere yol açmaktadır. Bu maruziyetler oogenezisin bozulmasına, menstrüel siklus düzensizliklerine, fertilitenin azalmasına ve organogenez döneminde teratojenik etkilerle doğum kusurlarına, nörolojik ya da kognitif bozukluklara neden olabilmektedir. Gebelik sırasındaki fizyolojik değişiklikler toksinlerin emilimini ve depolanmasını artırırken, laktasyon döneminde de yağda çözünen maddeler anne sütüyle bebeğe geçebilmektedir. Amerika Birleşik Devletleri verilerine göre infertilite, spontan abortus ve preterm doğum gibi olumsuz reprodüktif olaylar önemli oranlarda görülmektedir. Fetal büyümeyi olumsuz etkileyen karbonmonoksit, kurşun, cıva gibi güçlü ve kısmi etkili ajanlar mevcuttur. Bu riskleri en aza indirmek için klinisyenlerin rutin hasta değerlendirmelerine maruziyet tarama anketlerini dahil etmesi, hastalara kurşun, cıva, pestisit, fitalat ve bisfenol A (BPA) içeren ürünlerden kaçınmaları yönünde rehberlik etmesi gerekmektedir. Sonuç olarak, kimyasalların reprodüktif sisteme zararlarına dair kanıtlar artmakta olup, çevre ve klinik bilimlerde basit, açık bir kılavuzun oluşturulması ve rutin taramaların yaygınlaştırılması büyük önem taşımaktadır.
Exposure to environmental and occupational chemical pollutants during preconception and prenatal periods leads to permanent and adverse effects on the female reproductive system and fetal development. These exposures can cause disruption of oogenesis, menstrual cycle irregularities, reduced fertility, and, through teratogenic attacks during organogenesis, birth defects as well as neurological or cognitive disorders. While physiological changes during pregnancy increase the absorption and storage of toxins, fat-soluble substances can also be transferred to the infant through breast milk during lactation. According to data from the United States, adverse reproductive events such as infertility, spontaneous abortion, and preterm birth occur at significant rates. There are strong and partial agents, including carbon monoxide, lead, and mercury, that negatively affect fetal growth. To minimize these risks, clinicians must integrate exposure screening surveys into routine patient evaluations and guide patients to avoid products containing lead, mercury, pesticides, phthalates, and bisphenol A (BPA). Consequently, evidence regarding the harms of chemicals to the reproductive system is increasing, making the creation of a simple, clear guideline in environmental and clinical sciences, along with the expansion of routine screening, of paramount importance.
Referanslar
Goldman Rose H, Wylie JB. Overview of occupational and environmental risks to reproduction in females. UpToDate [Internet]. 2017.
Sutton P, Woodruff TJ, Perron J, et al. Toxic environmental chemicals: the role of reproductive health professionals in preventing harmful exposures. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2012; 207(3): 164-173.
Rutstein SO, Shah IH. Infecundity, infertility, and childlessness in developing countries. Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) Comparative reports No. 9. 2004. World Health Organization.
Sarac M, Koc I. Re: Prevalence and Risk Factors of Infertility in Turkey: Evidence from Demographic and Health Surveys, 1993-2013. Journal of Urological Surgery. 2018; 5(4): 229-230.
Handwerker L. Infertility and Patriarchy: The Cultural Politics of Gender and Family Life in Egypt. 1998. 510-512.
Lanphear BP. The impact of toxins on the developing brain. Annual review of public health. 2015; 36: 211-230.
Wang A, Padula A, Sirota M, et al. Environmental influences on reproductive health: the importance of chemical exposures. Fertility and sterility. 2016; 106(4): 905-929.
Anderson M, Goldman RH. Occupational reproductive hazards for female surgeons in the operating room: a review. JAMA surgery. 2020; 155(3): 243-249.
Thompson MR, Boekelheide K. Multiple environmental chemical exposures to lead, mercury and polychlorinated biphenyls among childbearing-aged women (NHANES 1999–2004): Body burden and risk factors. Environmental research. 2013; 121: 23-30.
Johnson J, Canning J, Kaneko T, et al. Germline stem cells and follicular renewal in the postnatal mammalian ovary. Nature. 2004; 428(6979): 145-150.
Spears N, Lopes F, Stefansdottir A, et al. Ovarian damage from chemotherapy and current approaches to its protection. Human reproduction update. 2019: 25(6); 673-693.
Hammer KC, Veiga A, Mahalingaiah S. Environmental toxicant exposure and menstrual cycle length. Current Opinion in Endocrinology. Diabetes, and Obesity. 2020; 27(6): 373.
Rachootin P, Olsen J. The risk of infertility and delayed conception associated with exposures in the Danish workplace. Journal of occupational medicine. 1983; 394-402.
Sallmén M, Lindbohm ML, Kyyrönen P, et al. Reduced fertility among women exposed to organic solvents. American journal of industrial medicine. 1995: 27(5); 699-713.
Rowland AS, Baird DD, Weinberg CR, et al. Reduced fertility among women employed as dental assistants exposed to high levels of nitrous oxide. New England Journal of Medicine. 1992; 327(14): 993-997.
Khattak S, Guiti K, McMartin K, et al. Pregnancy outcome following gestational exposure to organic solvents: a prospective controlled study. Jama. 1999; 281(12): 1106-1109.
Sahin M, Nazlican E, Bozdogan NY, et al. Determination of dermal exposure levels by patch methods in pesticide operators. Feb-fresenius environmental bulletin. 2021: 12635.
Eskenazi B, Harley K, Bradman A, et al. Association of in utero organophosphate pesticide exposure and fetal growth and length of gestation in an agricultural population. Environmental health perspectives. 2004; 112(10): 1116-1124.
Brent RL. Environmental causes of human congenital malformations: the pediatrician’s role in dealing with these complex clinical problems caused by a multiplicity of environmental and genetic factors. Pediatrics. (2004). ; 113(Supplement_3): 957-968.
Rodier PM. Environmental causes of central nervous system maldevelopment. Pediatrics. 2004; 113(Supplement_3): 1076-1083.
Grandjean P, Landrigan PJ. Neurobehavioural effects of developmental toxicity. The lancet neurology. 2014; 13(3): 330-338.
Qin X, Wu Y, Wang W, et al. Low organic solvent exposure and combined maternal–infant gene polymorphisms affect gestational age. Occupational and environmental medicine. 2008; 65(7): 482-487.
Roth TL. Epigenetics of neurobiology and behavior during development and adulthood. Developmental psychobiology. . 2012; 54(6): 590-597.
Lovinsky-Desir S, Miller RL. Epigenetics, asthma, and allergic diseases: a review of the latest advancements. Current allergy and asthma reports. 2012; 12(3): 211-220.
Snyder RD. Congenital mercury poisoning. New England Journal of Medicine. 1971; 284(18): 1014-1016.
Ettinger AS, Wengrovitz AM. Guidelines for the identification and management of lead exposure in pregnant and lactating women. CDC. 2010: https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/lead/publications/leadandpregnancy2010.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 18.08.2022).
LaDou J, Harrison R. Current occupational & environmental medicine (Eds.). New York: McGraw-Hill. 2007: p. 864.
Windham G, Fenster L. Environmental contaminants and pregnancy outcomes. Fertility and sterility. 2008; 89(2): e111-e116.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, & Committee on Obstetric Practice. Reducing Prenatal Exposure to Toxic Environmental Agents: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 832. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2021; 138(1): e40-e54.
McCue K, DeNicola N. Environmental exposures in reproductive health. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics. 2019; 46(3): 455-468.
