Antepartum Fetal Değerlendirme
Özet
Doğum öncesi fetusun iyilik durumunun değerlendirilmesi "Antepartum Fetal Değerlendirme" olarak adlandırılır ve temel amacı riskli bebekleri belirleyerek fetal ölümleri engellemektir. Amerikan Obstetri ve Jinekoloji Cemiyeti (ACOG), perinatal sonuçlara etkisi net kanıtlanmasa da bu testleri öncelikle yüksek risk grubundaki gebelikler için önermektedir. Fetusun derin uyku hali gibi fizyolojik durumlar testlerin yorumlanmasında yalancı pozitiflik gibi sorunlara yol açabilmektedir. Antepartum değerlendirmede kullanılan başlıca yöntemler; annenin hissettiği hareketleri saymasına dayanan fetal hareket takibi, kardiyotokografi cihazıyla fetal kalp hızı ve uterin kontraksiyonları kaydeden Nonstres Test (NST), ultrasonografi ve NST parametrelerini birleştiren Biyofizik Profil (BFP) ile majör fetal damarlardaki kan akım hızlarını ölçen Fetal Doppler Ultrasonografidir. NST'de 20 dakikalık izlemde belirli akselerasyonların görülmesi "Reaktif" olarak tanımlanır ve nörolojik iyilik halini gösterir. Biyofizik profil, akut ve non-akut parametreleri değerlendirerek hipoksemi riskini belirler. Fetal Doppler ise özellikle umbilikal arter akımlarını inceleyerek yüksek riskli gebeliklerde perinatal ölümleri ve mortalite riskini belirgin şekilde azaltmaktadır. Sonuç olarak, düşük riskli popülasyonda yüksek duyarlılıkta tek bir test olmasa da, riskli gruplarda umbilikal arter Doppler ölçümlerinin takibe eklenmesi kritik önem taşımaktadır.
Antenatal evaluation of fetal well-being during the prenatal period is known as "Antepartum Fetal Assessment," with the ultimate goal of identifying fetuses at risk of damage or mortality in utero to prevent fetal deaths. Although there is no concrete evidence that these tests definitely improve perinatal outcomes, institutions like ACOG primarily recommend them for high-risk pregnancies. Physiological conditions, such as the fetus spending 25% of its time in deep sleep during the third trimester, pose challenges like false positivity in test evaluation. The primary methods used in antepartum assessment include fetal movement monitoring based on the mother counting perceived movements, the Nonstress Test (NST) which records fetal heart rate and uterine contractions via cardiotocography, the Biophysical Profile (BPP) combining ultrasound and NST criteria, and Fetal Doppler Ultrasound measuring blood flow velocities in major fetal vessels. In NST, the presence of specific accelerations within a 20-minute window is considered "Reactive," indicating neurological and cardiovascular health. The Biophysical Profile evaluates acute and non-acute parameters to assess the risk of central nervous system hypoxemia or acidemia. Fetal Doppler, particularly umbilical artery analysis, significantly reduces perinatal mortality by detecting decreased, absent, or reversed end-diastolic flow in high-risk pregnancies. Consequently, while no single test offers high sensitivity for low-risk populations, incorporating fetal umbilical artery Doppler measurements is highly effective for managing high-risk groups.
Referanslar
O'Neill E, Thorp J. Antepartum evaluation of the fetus and fetal well being. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Sep;55(3):722-30.
Is the intrapartum biophysical profile useful? Kim SY, Khandelwal M, Gaughan JP, Agar MH, Reece EA Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(3):471.
Gabbe SG, Niebyl JR, Simpson JL. Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies. Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier; Philadelphia, PA: 2007.
Cronje HS, Grobler CJF, Visser AA. Obstetrics in Southern Africa. Pretoria: J.A. van Schaik Publishers, 1996.
Rådestad I. Fetal movements in the third trimester – Important information about wellbeing of the fetus. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare 2010;1:119‐21.
Winje BA, Saastad E, Gunnes N, Tveit JV, Stray‐Pedersen B, Flenady V, et al. Analysis of 'count‐to‐ten' fetal movement charts: a prospective cohort study. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2011;118(10):1229‐38.
D'Elia A, Pigletti M, Moccia G, Santangelo N. Spontaneous motor activity in normal fetuses. Early Human Development 2001;65(2):139‐47.
Tveit JVH, Saastad E, Stray‐Pedersen B, Børdahl Per E, Frøen JF. Concerns for decreased foetal movements in uncomplicated pregnancies – Increased risk of foetal growth restriction and stillbirth among women being overweight, advanced age or smoking. Journal of Maternal‐Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 2010;23(10):1129‐35.
Freda MC, Mikhail M, Mazloom E, Polizzoto R, Damus K, Merkatz I. Fetal movement counting: which method?. MCN. The American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing 1993;18:314‐21.
Thomsen SG, Legarth J, Weber T, Kristensen J. Monitoring of normal pregnancies by daily fetal movement registration or hormone assessment. A random allocation study. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1990;10:189‐93.
Gomez LM, Vega G, Padilla L, Bautista F, Villar A. Compliance with a fetal movement chart by high‐risk obstetric patients in a Peruvian hospital. American Journal of Perinatology 2007;24(2):89‐93.
Mangesi L, Hofmeyr GJ, Smith V, Smyth RM. Fetal movement counting for assessment of fetal wellbeing. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 15;2015(10):CD004909.
Moore TR, Piacquadio K. A prospective evaluation of fetal movement screening to reduce the incidence of antepartum fetal death. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;160(5 Pt 1):1075–1080.
Preboth M. ACOG guidelines on antepartum fetal surveillance. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Am Fam Physician. 2000 Sep 01;62(5):1184, 1187-8.
Umana OD, Siccardi MA. Prenatal Non-stress Test. 2022 May 16. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan–.
Campanile M, D'Alessandro P, Della Corte L, Saccone G, Tagliaferri S, Arduino B, Esposito G, Esposito FG, Raffone A, Signorini MG, Magenes G, Di Tommaso M, Xodo S, Zullo F, Berghella V. Intrapartum cardiotocography with and without computer analysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Jul;33(13):2284-2290.
Turitz AL, Bastek JA, Sammel MD, Parry S, Schwartz N. Can vibroacoustic stimulation improve the efficiency of a tertiary care antenatal testing unit? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Dec;25(12):2645-50.
Baser I, Johnson TR, Paine LL. Coupling of fetal movement and fetal heart rate accelerations as an indicator of fetal health. Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Jul;80(1):62-6.
Vintzileos AM, Fleming AD, Scorza WE, Wolf EJ, Balducci J, Campbell WA, Rodis JF. Relationship between fetal biophysical activities and umbilical cord blood gas values. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Sep;165(3):707-13.
Turan S, Turan OM, Berg C, Moyano D, Bhide A, Bower S, Thilaganathan B, Gembruch U, Nicolaides K, Harman C, Baschat AA. Computerized fetal heart rate analysis, Doppler ultrasound and biophysical profile score in the prediction of acid-base status of growth-restricted fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Oct;30(5):750-6.
Lavin JP, Miodovnik M, Barden TP. Relationship of nonstress test reactivity and gestational age. Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Mar;63(3):338-44.
Visser GH, Sadovsky G, Nicolaides KH. Antepartum heart rate patterns in small-for-gestational-age third-trimester fetuses: correlations with blood gas values obtained at cordocentesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Mar;162(3):698-703.
Castillo RA, Devoe LD, Arthur M, Searle N, Metheny WP, Ruedrich DA. The preterm nonstress test: effects of gestational age and length of study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Jan;160(1):172-5.
Freeman RK, Anderson G, Dorchester W. A prospective multi-institutional study of antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring. I. Risk of perinatal mortality and morbidity according to antepartum fetal heart rate test results. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Aug 01;143(7):771-7.
Ivanov B, Malinova M. [Comparative study of pathological Doppler and non-stress test in IUGR]. Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2011;50(7):12-6
Leveno KJ, Williams ML, DePalma RT, Whalley PJ. Perinatal outcome in the absence of antepartum fetal heart rate acceleration. Obstet Gynecol. 1983 Mar;61(3):347-55.
Keegan KA. The nonstress test. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Dec;30(4):921-35.
Lalor JG, Fawole B, Alfirevic Z, et al. Biophysical profile for fetal assessment in high risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008:CD000038.
Manning FA, Morrison I, Harman CR, et al. Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring: experience in 19,221 referred high-risk pregnancies. II. An analysis of false-negative fetal deaths. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;157(4 Pt 1):880–884.
The biophysical profile in labor.Sassoon DA, Castro LC, Davis JL, Bear M, Hobel CJ Obstet Gynecol. 1990;76(3 Pt 1):360.
Relation of rate of urine production to oxygen tension in small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Nicolaides KH, Peters MT, Vyas S, Rabinowitz R, Rosen DJ, Campbell S ,Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;162(2):387.
Acute oligohydramnios and deteriorating fetal biophysical profile associated with severe preeclampsia.
Sherer DM, Dayal AK, Schwartz BM, Onyeije CI, Manning FA J Matern Fetal Med. 1999;8(4):193.
Antepartum fetal evaluation: development of a fetal biophysical profile.Manning FA, Platt LD, Sipos L Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;136(6):787.
Breathing patterns before death in fetal lambs.Patrick JE, Dalton KJ, Dawes GS Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976;125(1):73.Fetal biophysical profile scoring: selective use of the nonstress test.
Manning FA, Morrison I, Lange IR, Harman CR, Chamberlain PF Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;156(3):709.
Zafman KB, Bruck E, Rebarber A, Saltzman DH, Fox NS Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(4):1033.
Frank A Manning, MD, Lynn L Simpson, MD, Deborah Levine, MD Deputy Editor: Vanessa A Barss, MD, FACOG Biophysical profile test for antepartum fetal assessment. Uptodate rewievs.
Dev Malik, MD, PhD Section Editors: Lynn L Simpson, MD, Deborah Levine, MD Deputy Editor: Vanessa A Barss, MD, FACOG Doppler ultrasound of the umbilical artery for fetal surveillance
Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Gyte GM. Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in normal pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010:CD001450.
Morales-Roselló J, Khalil A, Fornés-Ferrer V, et al. Progression of Doppler changes in early-onset small for gestational age fetuses. How frequent are the different progression sequences? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2018; 31:1000.
Visser GH, Stigter RH. Monitoring the growth retarded fetus. In: Asphyxia and Fetal Brain Damage, Maulik D (Ed), Springer International, 1997. p.333.
Mires G, Dempster J, Patel NB, Crawford JW. The effect of fetal heart rate on umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1987; 94:665.
Yarlagadda P, Willoughby L, Maulik D. Effect of fetal heart rate on umbilical arterial Doppler indices. J Ultrasound Med 1989; 8:215.
Rühle W, Gnirs J, Schmidt W. [Fetal heart rate and Doppler flow parameters in fetal blood vessels--evaluation of 2,517 individual signals]. Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol 1993; 197:90.
Karsdorp VH, van Vugt JM, van Geijn HP, et al. Clinical significance of absent or reversed end diastolic velocity waveforms in umbilical artery. Lancet.
Tyrrell S, Obaid AH, Lilford RJ. Umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry as a predictor of fetal hypoxia and acidosis at birth. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;74(3 Pt 1):332–337.
Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Gyte GM. Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010:CD007529.
Mulders LG, Muijsers GJ, Jongsma HW, et al. The umbilical artery blood flow velocity waveform in relation to fetal breathing movements, fetal heart rate and fetal behavioural states in normal pregnancy at 37 to 39 weeks. Early Hum Dev 1986; 14:283.
Chiba Y, Utsu M, Kanzaki T, Hasegawa T. Changes in venous flow and intra tracheal flow in fetal breathing movements. Ultrasound Med Biol 1985; 11:43.
Nyberg MK, Johnsen SL, Rasmussen S, Kiserud T. Fetal breathing is associated with increased umbilical blood flow. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 36:718.
