Pelvik Tabanın Ultrasonografik Görüntülenmesi
Özet
Pelvik taban ultrasonografisi, standardizasyon sorunları nedeniyle rutin kılavuzlara girmekte gecikmiş olsa da son yıllarda sentetik meşlerin kullanımı ve 3D/4D görüntüleme teknolojilerindeki ilerlemelerle ürojinekolojide yeniden önem kazanmıştır. Vajinal doğum ve yaşlanma gibi faktörlerin yol açtığı pelvik taban bozukluklarının değerlendirilmesinde; stres üriner inkontinans, pelvik organ prolapsusu, anal sfinkter ve levator kası incelemeleri ile askı meşlerinin takibinde pratik, ekonomik ve dinamik bir alternatif sunmaktadır. Transperineal 2D midsagittal plan görüntülemesi, simfizis pubisi sabit bir rehber nokta olarak kullanarak anatominin ve kas hareketlerinin objektif olarak değerlendirilmesini sağlar. Ayrıca, üretral hipermobilite ölçümleri, sarkan organların ayrımı, detrusor kası kalınlığı ve anal sfinkter defektlerinin tespiti gibi kritik klinik durumlarda ürodinami, MRI ve defekografiye güçlü bir seçenek oluşturmaktadır. Yapay zeka yazılımlarının da entegre edilmesiyle yakın gelecekte tanı ve takip süreçlerinde standart bir raporlama yöntemi olarak yerini alması öngörülmektedir.
Although pelvic floor ultrasonography was delayed in entering routine guidelines due to standardization issues, it has regained importance in urogynecology in recent years with the use of synthetic meshes and advancements in 3D/4D imaging technologies. In evaluating pelvic floor disorders caused by factors such as vaginal childbirth and aging, it offers a practical, economic, and dynamic alternative for stress urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, anal sphincter, and levator muscle examinations, as well as the follow-up of sling meshes. Transperineal 2D midsagittal plane imaging provides an objective evaluation of anatomy and muscle movements by using the symphysis pubis as a fixed reference point. Additionally, it constitutes a strong alternative to urodynamics, MRI, and defecography in critical clinical situations such as urethral hypermobility measurements, differentiation of prolapsed organs, detrusor muscle thickness, and detection of anal sphincter defects. With the integration of artificial intelligence software, it is anticipated to take its place as a standard reporting method in diagnosis and follow-up processes in the near future.
Referanslar
Medina CA, Costantini E, Petri E et al. Evaluation and surgery for stress urinary incontinence: a FIGO working group report. Neurourology and urodynamics; 2017; 36(2), 518-528.
Wu JM, Vaughan CP, Goode PS et al. Prevalence and trends of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. Obstetrics and Gynecology; 2014. 123(1), 141. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000057
Dietz HP, Wilson PD. The influence of bladder volume on the position and mobility of the urethrovesical junction. International Urogynecology Journal; 1999. 10(1), 3-6. doi: 10.1007/pl00004011
Albrich S, Steetskamp J, Knoechel SL, Porta S, Hoffmann G, Skala C. Assessment of pelvic floor muscle contractility: digital palpation versus 2D and 3D perineal ultrasound. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics; 2016. 293(4), 839-843. doi:10.1007/s00404-015-3897-5
Naranjo-Ortiz C, Shek KL, Martin AJ et al. What is normal bladder neck anatomy? International Urogynecology Journal; 2016; 27(6), 945-950. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2916-1
Turkoglu A, Coskun ADE, Arinkan SA, Vural F. The role of transperineal ultrasound in the evaluation of stress urinary incontinence cases. International Brazilian Journal of Urology ; 2022; 48, 70-77. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.1100
Dietz HP . Pelvic floor ultrasound: a review. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology; 2017. 60(1), 58-81. doi:10.1097/GRF.0000000000000264.
Bogusiewicz M. Ultrasound imaging in urogynecology–state of the art 2016. Menopause Review/Przegląd Menopauzalny; 2016. 15(3), 123-132.
Chan L, Tse V. Pelvic floor ultrasound in the diagnosis of sling complications. World Journal of Urology; 2018. 36(5), 753-759. doi:10.1007/s00345-018-2253-3
Khullar V, Cardozo LD, Salvatore S, Hill S. Ultrasound: a noninvasive screening test for detrusor instability. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology; 1996. 103(9), 904-908. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09910.x
Latthe P, Middleton L, Rachaneni S, McCooty S, Daniels J, Coomarasamy A, Jacobs Y. Ultrasound bladder wall thickness and detrusor overactivity: a multicentre test accuracy study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology; 2017. 124(9), 1422-1429. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.14503
Guzmán Rojas RA, Shek KL, Langer SM, Dietz HP. Prevalence of anal sphincter injury in primiparous women. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology; 2013. 42(4), 461-466. doi:10.1002/uog.12481.
Shek KL, Zazzera VD, Atan I K, Rojas RG, Langer S, Dietz HP. The evolution of transperineal ultrasound findings of the external anal sphincter during the first years after childbirth. International Urogynecology Journal; 2016. 27(12), 1899-1903. doi:10.1007/s00192-016-3055-z
Roos AM, Abdool Z, Sultan AH, Thakar R. The diagnostic accuracy of endovaginal and transperineal ultrasound for detecting anal sphincter defects: the PREDICT study. Clinical Radiology; 2011. 66(7), 597-604. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2010.11.017
DeLancey JO, Morgan DM, Fenner DE, Kearney R, Guire K, Miller JM, Ashton-Miller JA. Comparison of levator ani muscle defects and function in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse. Obstetrics & Gynecology; 2007. 109(2 Part 1), 295-302. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000250901.57095.ba
Cacciari LP, Morin M, Mayrand MH, Tousignant M, Abrahamowicz M, Dumoulin C. Pelvic floor morphometrical and functional changes immediately after pelvic floor muscle training and at 1‐year follow‐up, in older incontinent women. Neurourology and Urodynamics; 2021. 40(1), 245-255. doi:10.1002/nau.24542
Jeong HY, Yang SJ, Cho DH, Park DH, Lee JK. Comparison of 3-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasonography and defecography for assessment of posterior pelvic floor disorders. Annals of Coloproctology; 2020. 36(4), 256. doi:10.3393/ac.2020.02.09
