Kasa İnvaze Mesane Kanserinde Açık, Laparoskopik ve Robotik Cerrahi Yöntemleri
Özet
Bu yazı, kas invaze mesane kanseri (KİMK) tedavisinde standart cerrahi yöntem olan radikal sistektominin (RS) açık, laparoskopik ve robotik yaklaşımlarını güncel bir perspektifle ele almaktadır. Altın standart kabul edilen açık RS, yüksek perioperatif morbidite ve uzun hastanede kalış süreleri nedeniyle yerini giderek minimal invaziv yöntemlere bırakmaktadır. Erkek ve kadın hastalarda işeme, cinsel fonksiyonlar ve pelvik organların korunmasına yönelik geliştirilen güncel cerrahi teknikler, onkolojik sonuçlardan ödün vermeden yaşam kalitesini artırmayı hedeflese de henüz standart tedavi olarak önerilmemekte, seçilmiş hastalarda alternatif olarak sunulmaktadır. Minimal invaziv tekniklerden laparoskopik ve robotik yardımlı radikal sistektomi (RYRS), açık cerrahiye kıyasla daha az kan kaybı, daha kısa hastanede kalış süresi ve daha az yara komplikasyonu gibi avantajlar sağlamaktadır. RYRS daha uzun ameliyat süresi ve yüksek maliyet gerektirse de iki yıllık progresyonsuz sağ kalım, komplikasyon oranları ve yaşam kalitesi açısından açık cerrahiden aşağı kalır yanı olmadığını gösteren RAZOR gibi büyük randomize kontrollü çalışmalar mevcuttur. Sonuç olarak, cerrahi yöntemin kendisinden ziyade, operasyonu gerçekleştiren cerrahın deneyimi ve kliniğin vaka hacmi, tedavi başarısı ve onkolojik sonuçlar üzerinde belirleyici en önemli kilit faktörlerdir.
This text reviews the open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches of radical cystectomy (RC), the standard surgical treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), from a contemporary perspective. Open RC, considered the gold standard, is gradually being replaced by minimally invasive methods due to high perioperative morbidity and prolonged hospital stays. Current surgical techniques aimed at preserving voiding, sexual functions, and pelvic organs in male and female patients intend to improve quality of life without compromising oncological outcomes; however, they are not yet recommended as standard treatment but offered as alternatives in selected patients. Minimally invasive techniques, such as laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC), provide advantages like less blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and fewer wound complications compared to open surgery. Although RARC requires longer operative time and higher costs, large randomized controlled trials like the RAZOR study show it is non-inferior to open surgery regarding two-year progression-free survival, complication rates, and quality of life. Consequently, rather than the surgical approach itself (open, robotic, or laparoscopic), the surgeon's experience and the hospital's case volume stand out as the most critical key factors determining treatment success and oncological outcomes.
Referanslar
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL , Torre LA , Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLO BOCA N estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CACancer J Clin 2018;68:394–424.
IARC, Estimated number of new cases in 2020, worldwide, both sexes, all ages. [Access date March 2020]. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/900-world-fact-sheets.pdf
Witjes A, Bruins M, Cathomas R. Guidelines on muscle invasive and metastatic bladder cancer. The Netherlands: European Association of Urology; [Internet]. Available from: https://uroweb.org/guideline/bladder-cancer-muscle-inva¬sive-and-metastatic/#7 [cited 2020, Apr 21].
Roghmann F, Trinh Q-D, Braun K, et al. Standardized assessment of complications in a contemporary series of European patients un-dergoing radical cystectomy. Int J Urol 2014;21:143–9.
Hernandez, V., et al. Oncological and functional outcomes of sexual function-preserving cystectomy compared with standard radical cystectomy in men: A systematic review. Urol Oncol, 2017. 35: 539.e17. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28495555/6.
Veskimae, E., et al. Systematic review of the oncological and functional outcomes of pelvic organpreserving radical cystectomy (RC) compared with standard RC in women who undergo curative surgery and orthotopic neobladder substitution for bladder cancer. BJU Int, 2017. 120: 12. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28220653/.
Stenzl, A., et al. Cystectomy – Technical Considerations in Male and Female Patients. EAU Update Series, 2005. 3: 138.
Voigt, M., et al. Influence of Simple and Radical Cystectomy on Sexual Function and Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Female Patients: A Scoping Review of the Literature. Sex Med Rev, 2019. 7: 408. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31029621/
Ali-El-Dein, B., et al. Preservation of the internal genital organs during radical cystectomy in selected women with bladder cancer: a report on 15 cases with long term follow-up. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2013. 39: 358. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23422323/
Temkin, S.M., et al. Ovarian Cancer Prevention in High-risk Women. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2017. 60: 738. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28957949/.
Hussain A, Malik A, Halim MU, Ali AM. The use of robotics in surgery: a review. Int J Clin Pract 2014;68:1376–82.
Soave A, Schmidt S, Dahlem R, et al. Does the extent of variant histology affect oncological outcomes in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder treated with radical cystectomy? Urol Oncol Semin Orig Investig 2015;33:21, 21.e1–21.e9.
Bhindi B, Yu J, Kuk C, et al. The importance of surgeon characteristics on impacting oncologic outcomes for patients undergoing radical cystectomy. J Urol 2014;192:714–20.
Tang, K., et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical cystectomy in bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. PLoS One, 2014. 9: e95667. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24835573/
Khan, M.S., et al. A Single-centre Early Phase Randomised Controlled Three-arm Trial of Open, Robotic, and Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy (CORAL). Eur Urol, 2016. 69: 613. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26272237/
Khan, M.S., et al. Long-term Oncological Outcomes from an Early Phase Randomised Controlled Three-arm Trial of Open, Robotic, and Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy (CORAL). Eur Urol, 2020. 77: 110.
Rai, B.P., et al. Robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2019. 4: Cd011903. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31016718/
Wilson, T.G., et al. Best practices in robot-assisted radical cystectomy and urinary reconstruction: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel. Eur Urol, 2015. 67: 363. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25582930/
Faraj, K.S., et al. Effect of intracorporeal urinary diversion on the incidence of benign ureteroenteric stricture after cystectomy. Int J Urol, 2021. 28: 593. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33594730/
Ahmadi, N., et al. Use of indocyanine green to minimise uretero-enteric strictures after robotic radical cystectomy. BJU Int, 2019. 124: 302. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30815976/
Venkatramani, V., et al. Predictors of Recurrence, and Progression-Free and Overall Survival following Open versus Robotic Radical Cystectomy: Analysis from the RAZOR Trial with a 3-Year Followup. J Urol, 2020. 203: 522.
Faraj, K.S., et al. Robot Assisted Radical Cystectomy vs Open Radical Cystectomy: Over 10 years of the Mayo Clinic Experience. Urol Oncol, 2019. 37: 862. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31526651/
Wei, L., et al. Accurate Quantification of Residual Cancer Cells in Pelvic Washing Reveals Association with Cancer Recurrence Following Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy. J Urol, 2019. 201: 1105. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30730413/
Rai, B.P., et al. Robot-assisted vs open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in adults. BJU Int, 2020. 125: 765. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31309688/
Hussein, A.A., et al. Outcomes of Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion after Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: Results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. J Urol, 2018. 199: 1302. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29275112/
Zhang, J.H., et al. Large Single Institution Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes and Complications of Open Radical Cystectomy, Intracorporeal Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy and Robotic Extracorporeal Approach. J Urol, 2020. 203: 512. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31580189/
Wijburg, C.J., et al. Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy Versus Open Radical Cystectomy in Bladder Cancer Patients: A Multicentre Comparative Effectiveness Study. Eur Urol, 2021. 79: 609. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33446375/
