Prostat Kanserinde Cerrahi Sonrası Görülen Komplikasyonlara Yaklaşım
Özet
Prostat kanseri tedavisinde altın standart olan radikal prostatektomi (RP) cerrahisi; açık, laparoskopik ve robot yardımlı yöntemlerle uygulanmaktadır. Cerrahide temel amaç kanserin tam eradikasyonu iken, hastaların yaşam kalitesini doğrudan etkileyen kontinans ve erektil fonksiyonların korunması da kritik hedeflerdendir. Teknolojik gelişmelerle birlikte intraoperatif ve perioperatif komplikasyon oranları önemli ölçüde azalmıştır. İntraoperatif dönemde en sık dorsal ven kompleksi kaynaklı kanamalar, nadiren de rektal, üreter ve obturator sinir yaralanmaları görülebilmektedir. Postoperatif erken dönemde ise atelektazi, derin ven trombozu gibi genel cerrahi risklerin yanı sıra RP'ye özgü gecikmiş kanamalar, anastomoz kaçakları ve lenfosel oluşumu takip edilmelidir. Uzun dönemde karşılaşılan mesane boynu darlığı endoskopik girişimlerle; üriner inkontinans ise pelvik taban kas egzersizleri, askı operasyonları veya yapay sfinkter ile tedavi edilmektedir. Erektil disfonksiyon yönetiminde birinci basamakta PDE-5 inhibitörleri kullanılırken, dirençli vakalarda intrakavernozal enjeksiyonlar ve penil protez implantasyonu başarı sağlamaktadır. Günümüzde robotik cerrahi fonksiyonel sonuçları henüz tam anlamıyla iyileştirememiş olsa da akut komplikasyonları asgariye indirmiştir.
Radical prostatectomy (RP), the gold standard treatment for prostate cancer, is performed through open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted methods, aiming for complete cancer eradication while preserving urinary continence and erectile functions. Technological advancements have significantly reduced intraoperative and perioperative complications, shifting more focus toward long-term outcomes. Main intraoperative complications include hemorrhages mostly originating from the dorsal venous complex, along with rare occurrences of rectal, ureteral, and obturator nerve injuries. In the early postoperative period, general surgical risks like deep vein thrombosis coexist with RP-specific issues such as delayed hemorrhages, anastomotic leaks, and lymphoceles. Long-term complications primarily manifest as bladder neck contracture, urinary incontinence, and erectile dysfunction. Bladder neck contracture is managed via endoscopic incisions, whereas urinary incontinence is treated with pelvic floor exercises, male slings, or artificial urinary sphincters. For erectile dysfunction, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors serve as the first-line therapy, while intracavernosal injections and penile prosthesis implantation are utilized in refractory cases. Consequently, while advanced techniques like robotic surgery have dramatically minimized acute surgical complications, research continues to improve long-term functional recovery rates.
Referanslar
Fode M, Jensen CFS, Østergren PB. Standardized reporting for sexual function following prostate cancer treatment. Int J Impot Res. 2020;32(5):549-550.
Bianco FJ, Jr., Scardino PT, Eastham JA. Radical prostatectomy: long-term cancer control and recovery of sexual and urinary function ("trifecta"). Urology. 2005;66(5 Suppl):83-94.
Patel VR, Sivaraman A, Coelho RF, et al. Pentafecta: a new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2011;59(5):702-707.
Basiri A, de la Rosette JJ, Tabatabaei S, et al. Comparison of retropubic, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: who is the winner? World J Urol. 2018;36(4):609-621.
Rainwater LM, Segura JW. Technical consideration in radical retropubic prostatectomy: blood loss after ligation of dorsal venous complex. J Urol. 1990;143(6):1163-1165.
Antonelli A, Palumbo C, Veccia A, et al. Standard vs delayed ligature of the dorsal vascular complex during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: results from a randomized controlled trial. J Robot Surg. 2019;13(2):253-260.
Wu SD, Meeks JJ, Cashy J, et al. Suture versus staple ligation of the dorsal venous complex during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2010;106(3):385-390.
Hirasawa Y, Ohno Y, Nakashima J, et al. Impact of a preoperatively estimated prostate volume using transrectal ultrasonography on surgical and oncological outcomes in a single surgeon's experience with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(9):3702-3708.
Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: an analysis of the first 180 cases. J Urol. 2001;166(6):2101-2108.
Barashi NS, Pearce SM, Cohen AJ, et al. Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes for Rectal Injury During Radical Prostatectomy: A Population-based Study. Eur Urol Oncol. 2018;1(6):501-506.
Mandel P, Linnemannstöns A, Chun F, et al. Incidence, Risk Factors, Management, and Complications of Rectal Injuries During Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol Focus. 2018;4(4):554-557.
Canda AE, Tilki D, Mottrie A. Rectal Injury During Radical Prostatectomy: Focus on Robotic Surgery. Eur Urol Oncol. 2018;1(6):507-509.
Jhaveri JK, Penna FJ, Diaz-Insua M, et al. Ureteral injuries sustained during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2014;28(3):318-324.
Teber D, Gözen AS, Cresswell J, et al. Prevention and management of ureteral injuries occurring during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Heilbronn experience and a review of the literature. World J Urol. 2009;27(5):613-618.
Yıkılmaz TN, Öztürk E, Hamidi N, et al. Management of obturator nevre injury during pelvic lymph node dissection. Turk J Urol. 2019;45(Supp. 1):S26-s29.
Patel HD, Faisal FA, Trock BJ, et al. Effect of Pharmacologic Prophylaxis on Venous Thromboembolism After Radical Prostatectomy: The PREVENTER Randomized Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2020;78(3):360-368.
Shekarriz B, Upadhyay J, Wood DP. Intraoperative, perioperative, and long-term complications of radical prostatectomy. The Urologic clinics of North America. 2001;28(3):639-653.
Fujisaki A, Takayama T, Yamazaki M, et al. Postoperative Hemorrhagic Shock 7 Days After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Journal of endourology case reports. 2020;6(4):448-450.
Beckley I, Patterson B, Hamaday M, et al. Case report: delayed hemorrhage from an accessory internal pudendal artery pseudoaneurysm after robotic radical prostatectomy: successful management with ct angiography and embolization. J Endourol. 2007;21(8):923-925.
Kakutani S, Takeshima Y, Yamada Y, et al. Clinical significance and risk factors of urethrovesical anastomotic urinary leakage following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study. BMC urology. 2021;21(1):75.
Tyritzis SI, Katafigiotis I, Constantinides CA. All you need to know about urethrovesical anastomotic urinary leakage following radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2012;188(2):369-376.
Tsaur I, Thomas C. Risk factors, complications and management of lymphocele formation after radical prostatectomy: A mini-review. International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association. 2019;26(7):711-716.
Shinchi M, Horiguchi A, Ojima K, et al. Deep lateral transurethral incision for vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis after radical prostatectomy. International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association. 2021;28(11):1120-1126.
Mann JA, Silverman J, Westenberg A. Intralesional steroid injection combined with bladder neck incision is efficacious in the treatment of recurrent bladder neck contracture. Lower urinary tract symptoms. 2021;13(1):64-68.
Mata L, Azevedo C. Prevalence and severity levels of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence: different assessment instruments. 2021;74(2):e20200692.
Rahnama'i MS, Marcelissen T, Geavlete B, et al. Current Management of Post-radical Prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence. Frontiers in surgery. 2021;8:647656.
Fourmarier M, de la Taille A, Azzouzi A, et al. Management of male urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy (CTMH AFU 2006-4/5): Place of intraurethral macroplastique injection, artificial urinary sphincter and cell therapy. Progres en Urologie: Journal de L'association Francaise D'urologie et de la Societe Francaise D'urologie. 2008;18(2):85-88.
Feng D, Tang C, Liu S, et al. Current management strategy of treating patients with erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Impotence Research. 2022;34(1):18-36.
Kendirci M, Bejma J, Hellstrom WJ. Update on erectile dysfunction in prostate cancer patients. Current opinion in urology. 2006;16(3):186-195.
Marchioni M, De Francesco P, Castellucci R, et al. Management of erectile disfunction following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica= The Italian Journal of Urology and Nephrology. 2020.
