Nüks Hernilere Yaklaşım

Yazarlar

Onur Güven

Özet

Nüks herniler, teknik veya hastaya bağlı risk faktörleri nedeniyle ilk onarım sonrası %0.5-15 oranında görülen, yüksek cerrahi tecrübe gerektiren yaygın bir hastalıktır. Erken nüksler genellikle yetersiz diseksiyon, aşırı gerilim ve deneyimsizlik gibi cerrahi faktörlerden kaynaklanırken; geç nüksler obezite, sigara, yaşlanma ve genetik kollajen doku zayıflıkları gibi hasta kaynaklı nedenlerle ilk üç yılda ortaya çıkar. Tanıda klinik muayene temel araç olsa da, şüpheli veya obez olgularda yüksek duyarlılığa sahip inguinal ultrasonografi ilk tercih edilen görüntüleme yöntemidir. Asemptomatik hastalar düşük inkarserasyon riskiyle güvenle izlenebilirken, semptomatik veya komplikasyonlu nükslerde cerrahi onarım şarttır. Cerrahi teknik seçiminde temel kural anatomik yaklaşımdır; başarısız posterior (laparoskopik) onarımlar anterior yaklaşımla (Lichtenstein), başarısız anterior onarımlar ise daha az ağrı ve hızlı iyileşme sağlayan posterior yaklaşımla (tercihen laparoskopik TEP veya TAPP) tedavi edilir. Ancak nüks onarımları primer ameliyatlara göre daha karmaşık olup, takip süresine bağlı olarak %20'ye varan yeniden nüks etme riskine sahiptir.

Recurrent hernias are common conditions encountered in surgical practice, with incidence rates ranging from 0.5% to 15% following primary repair due to either technical or patient-related risk factors. While early recurrences typically stem from technical issues such as inadequate dissection, excessive tension, inappropriate mesh size, or surgeon inexperience, late recurrences generally manifest within the first three years, driven by patient-specific factors including obesity, smoking, aging, and genetic collagen matrix deficiencies. Although a thorough clinical examination remains the primary diagnostic tool, inguinal ultrasonography is recommended as the initial imaging modality for obese patients or ambiguous cases due to its non-invasive nature and high sensitivity. Asymptomatic recurrent hernias can be safely managed with watchful waiting due to a low risk of incarceration, whereas symptomatic cases or those presenting with complications necessitate surgical intervention. The selection of the surgical technique is dictated by the anatomy of the previous repair; failed posterior repairs are addressed via an anterior approach (Lichtenstein), while failed anterior mesh repairs are treated using a posterior approach (preferably laparoscopic TEP or TAPP), which offers reduced postoperative pain and faster recovery. Nonetheless, recurrent hernia repairs remain technically challenging, carrying a subsequent re-recurrence rate of up to 20% depending on the follow-up duration.

Referanslar

Miserez M, Alexandre JH, Campanelli G, et al. The European hernia society groin hernia classification: simple and easy to remember. Hernia 2007; 11:113.

Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H, Strand L, et al. Quality assessment of 26,304 herniorrhaphies in Denmark: a prospective nationwide study. Lancet 2001; 358:1124.

Scott NW, McCormack K, Graham P, et al. Open mesh versus non-mesh for repair of femoral and inguinal hernia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; :CD002197.

Magnusson N, Nordin P, Hedberg M, et al. The time profile of groin hernia recurrences. Hernia 2010; 14:341.

Sevonius D, Gunnarsson U, Nordin P, et al. Recurrent groin hernia surgery. Br J Surg 2011; 98:1489.

Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H, Strand L, et al. Quality assessment of 26,304 herniorrhaphies in Denmark: a prospective nationwide study. Lancet 2001; 358:1124.

Bay-Nielsen M, Nordin P, Nilsson E, et al. Operative findings in recurrent hernia after a Lichtenstein procedure. Am J Surg 2001; 182:134.

Mikkelsen T, Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H. Risk of femoral hernia after inguinal herniorrhaphy. Br J Surg 2002; 89:486.

Lau H. Recurrence following endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty. Hernia 2007; 11:415.

EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Repair of groin hernia with synthetic mesh: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 2002; 235:322.

EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Mesh compared with non-mesh methods of open groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg 2000; 87:854.

Eklund AS, Montgomery AK, Rasmussen IC, et al. Low recurrence rate after laparoscopic (TEP) and open (Lichtenstein) inguinal hernia repair: a randomized, multicenter trial with 5-year follow-up. Ann Surg 2009; 249:33.

Matthews RD, Anthony T, Kim LT, et al. Factors associated with postoperative complications and hernia recurrence for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair: a report from the VA Cooperative Hernia Study Group. Am J Surg 2007; 194:611.

Abrahamson J. Etiology and pathophysiology of primary and recurrent groin hernia formation. Surg Clin North Am 1998; 78:953.

Neumayer LA, Gawande AA, Wang J, et al. Proficiency of surgeons in inguinal hernia repair: effect of experience and age. Ann Surg 2005; 242:344.

Jansen PL, Klinge U, Jansen M, Junge K. Risk factors for early recurrence after inguinal hernia repair. BMC Surg 2009; 9:18.

Rosenberg J, Bisgaard T, Kehlet H, et al. Danish Hernia Database recommendations for the management of inguinal and femoral hernia in adults. Dan Med Bull 2011; 58:C4243.

Franz MG. The biology of hernia formation. Surg Clin North Am 2008; 88:1.

Zheng H, Si Z, Kasperk R, et al. Recurrent inguinal hernia: disease of the collagen matrix? World J Surg 2002; 26:401.

Robinson A, Light D, Nice C. Meta-analysis of sonography in the diagnosis of inguinal hernias. J Ultrasound Med 2013; 32:339.

Expert Panel on Gastrointestinal Imaging, Fowler KJ, Garcia EM, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Palpable Abdominal Mass-Suspected Neoplasm. J Am Coll Radiol 2019; 16:S384.

Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Giobbie-Hurder A, Gibbs JO, et al. Watchful waiting vs repair of inguinal hernia in minimally symptomatic men: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2006; 295:285.

Dedemadi G, Sgourakis G, Radtke A, et al. Laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for recurrent inguinal hernia: a meta-analysis of outcomes. Am J Surg 2010; 200:291.

Karthikesalingam A, Markar SR, Holt PJ, Praseedom RK. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic with open mesh repair of recurrent inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 2010; 97:4.

Lo Menzo E, Spector SA, Iglesias A, et al. Management of recurrent inguinal hernias after total extraperitoneal (TEP) herniorrhaphies. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2009; 19:475.

Bisgaard T, Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H. Re-recurrence after operation for recurrent inguinal hernia. A nationwide 8-year follow-up study on the role oftype of repair. Ann Surg 2008; 247:707.

Søndenaa K, Nesvik I, Breivik K, Kørner H. Long-term follow-up of 1059 consecutive primary and recurrent inguinal hernias in a teaching hospital. Eur J Surg 2001; 167:125.

Gelecek

10 Ocak 2023

Lisans

Lisans