Fıtık Cerrahisinde Laparoskopinin Yeri

Yazarlar

Muharrem Öner
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6835-584X

Özet

Laparoskopik fıtık onarımı, düşük enfeksiyon riski, küçük kesi boyutu, daha az ağrı ve hızlı iyileşme gibi avantajlar sunan minimal invaziv bir cerrahi yöntemdir. Geçmişi Antik Mısır'a uzanan fıtık cerrahisinde, meş kullanımı 20. yüzyılın sonlarında yaygınlaşmış ve günümüzde sütür tekniklerinin yerini almıştır. Günümüzde en popüler laparoskopik teknikler transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) ve tamamen ekstraperitoneal (TEP) onarımlardır. TEP karın içine girmeden uygulanırken, TAPP transabdominal olarak preperitoneal boşluğun açılmasını içerir. Güvenli bir cerrahi için Cooper ligamenti, epigastrik damarlar, spermatik kord ve femoral kanal gibi anatomik yapıların net bir şekilde tanımlanması; ayrıca "ağrı üçgeni" ve "kıyamet üçgeni" gibi riskli bölgelerden kaçınılması hayati önem taşır. Semptomatik, tekrarlayan veya iki taraflı fıtıklar laparoskopi için temel endikasyonlarken; geçirilmiş preperitoneal cerrahi ve redükte edilemeyen fıtıklar kontrendikasyon oluşturur. Dik öğrenme eğrisi ve yüksek maliyet gibi dezavantajlarına rağmen, laparoskopik ve robotik cerrahi, açık yöntemlerin yerini hızla almaktadır.

Laparoscopic hernia repair is a minimally invasive surgical method providing advantages such as low infection risk, small incision size, less pain, and rapid recovery. In hernia surgery, which dates back to Ancient Egypt, the use of mesh became widespread in the late 20th century and has replaced suture techniques today. Currently, the most popular laparoscopic techniques are transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repairs. While TEP is applied without entering the abdomen, TAPP involves opening the preperitoneal space transabdominally. For safe surgery, it is vital to clearly define anatomical structures such as the Cooper ligament, epigastric vessels, spermatic cord, and femoral canal, as well as to avoid risky areas like the "triangle of pain" and "triangle of doom". Symptomatic, recurrent, or bilateral hernias are primary indications for laparoscopy, whereas previous preperitoneal surgery and irreducible hernias pose contraindications. Despite disadvantages like a steep learning curve and higher cost, laparoscopic and robotic surgery are rapidly replacing open methods.

Referanslar

Bendavid R. The Shouldice repair. In: Fitzgibbons RJ, Greenburg G, editors. Hernia. 5th ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 2009. p. 129–38.

Usher F, Fries J, Oschner JL. Clinical studies. Arch Surg. 1959;78:138–45.

Edelman, DS; Hodde, JP. "Bioactive prosthetic material for treatment of hernias". Surgical Technology International. 2006;15: 104–8.

Wagner, Justin; Brunicardi; Amid; Chen (2015). "Inguinal Hernias". Schwartz's Principles of Surgery, 10e. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07179674-3

World Guidelines Management European Hernia Society. Retrieved December 1, 2017

Sharma A, Dey A, Khullar R, Soni V, Baijal M, Chowbey PK . Laparoscopic repair of suprapubic hernias: transabdominal partial extraperitoneal (TAPE) technique. Surg Endosc. 2011; 25:2147–2152

Belyansky I, Zahiri HR, Park A. Laparoscopic transversus abdominis release, novel minimally invasive approach to complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Surg Innov 2016;23(2):134–141.

Askar OM . Surgical anatomy of the aponeurotic expansions of the anterior abdominal wall. Ann R Coll Surg Engl . 1977;59(4):313–321

N L Bullen , L H Massey , S A Antoniou , N J Smart , R H Fortelny Open versus laparoscopic mesh repair of primary unilateral uncomplicated inguinal hernia: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis Hernia 2019 ;23(3):461-472.

Alberto Aiolfi et al Treatment of Inguinal Hernia: Systematic Review and Updated Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Ann Surg 2021;274(6):954-961.

Aaron Kler, Nisa Sekhon, George A Antoniou, Thomas Satyadas Totally extra-peritoneal repair versus trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal repair for the laparoscopic surgical management of sportsman's hernia: A systematic review and meta-analysis Surg Endosc 2021;35(10):5399-5413.

HerniaSurge Group: M P Simons, M Smietanski, H J Bonjer et al.. International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia.2018;22(1):1-165.doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x. Epub 2018 Jan

Alberto Aiolfi , Marta Cavalli , Simona Del Ferraro et al. Total extraperitoneal (TEP) versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernioplasty: systematic review and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials. Hernia 2021 ;25(5):1147-1157.

Bansal VK, et al. A prospective, randomized comparison of longterm outcomes: chronic groin pain and quality of life following. Surg Endosc . 2013;27, 2373–2382.

U Bracale, F Corcione , D Neola, S Castiglioni, G Cavallaro , C Stabilini , E Botteri , M Sodo, N Imperatore, R Peltrini. Transversus abdominis release (TAR) for ventral hernia repair: open or robotic? Short-term outcomes from a systematic review with meta-analysis. Hernia. 2021;25(6):1471-1480.

Bernhard Dauser, Nikolaus Hartig, Mariam Vedadinejad , Elisabeth Kirchner , Florian Trummer , Friedrich Herbst. Robotic-assisted repair of complex ventral hernia: can it pay off?. J.Robotic Surg.2021;15(1):45-52.

O Y Kudsi , F Gokcal. Lateral approach totally extraperitoneal (TEP) robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair. 2021;25(1):211-222.

Poelman MM, et al. EAES Consensus Development Conference on endoscopic repair of groin hernias. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(10):3505–19.

Atila K, et al. Prosthetic repair of acutely incarcerated groin hernias: a prospective clinical observational cohort study. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010;395(5):563–8.

Leibl BJ, et al. Laparoscopic transperitoneal hernia repair of incarcerated hernias: Is it feasible? Results of a prospective study. Surg Endosc. 2001;15(10):1179–83.

Gelecek

10 Ocak 2023

Lisans

Lisans