Onkolojide Farmakodinami
Özet
Onkolojide optimum tedavi başarısı elde etmek, ilaçların antitümör etkinliklerinin sürdürülebilmesi ve toksik etkilerinin en aza indirilmesi amacıyla farmakokinetik ve farmakodinamik parametrelerin birlikte değerlendirilmesini gerektirir. Geleneksel ampirik yaklaşımların yerini alan modern dozaj planlamalarında yaş, cinsiyet, kilo ve ilaç etkileşimleri gibi bireysel faktörler kritik rol oynamaktadır. Farmakodinamik modellemeler, özellikle kemoterapötiklerin nötropeni gibi toksik etkilerinin şiddetini ve süresini öngörmede kullanılırken, monoklonal antikorlar gibi büyük moleküllü ajanların toksisitesinin dozdan bağımsız gelişebildiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Ayrıca ilaçların uygulama şemalarındaki değişiklikler (örneğin bölünmüş dozlar), plazma konsantrasyonunu ve antitümör etkinliği doğrudan etkilemektedir. Tedavinin kişiselleştirilmesinde vücut yüzey alanı geleneksel bir kriter olsa da, klirens ile ilişkisinin yetersizliği sınırlar oluşturmaktadır. Böbrek ve karaciğer yetmezliği olan hastalarda ilaç birikimini ve yaşamı tehdit eden toksisiteyi önlemek için spesifik doz azaltımları şarttır. Son olarak, sitokrom P450 (CYP) enzim sistemini etkileyen diğer kemoterapötikler, non-kemoterapötik ilaçlar, gıdalar ve hastaların %85'e varan oranda hekimlerinden habersiz kullandığı tamamlayıcı alternatif tıbbi ürünler (deve dikeni, sarımsak, kantaron vb.), ilaç metabolizmasını değiştirerek tedavinin etkinliğini zayıflatabilir veya toksisiteyi artırabilir. Sonuç olarak, onkolojik ajanların verimli kullanımı hastaya özgü çoklu parametrelerin doğru analizine bağlıdır.
Achieving optimum therapeutic success in oncology requires a comprehensive evaluation of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters to maintain antitumor efficacy and minimize toxicity. In modern dosage planning, which replaces empirical approaches, individual factors such as age, gender, weight, and drug interactions play a critical role. Pharmacodynamic modeling is utilized to predict the severity and duration of toxicities like chemotherapy-induced neutropenia; however, larger molecules like monoclonal antibodies can exhibit toxicities independent of the administered dose. Furthermore, alterations in administration schedules, such as divided dosing, directly influence plasma concentration and antitumor activity. Although body surface area remains a traditional criterion for personalizing treatment, its lack of correlation with drug clearance presents significant limitations. Specific dose reductions are mandatory in patients with renal or hepatic impairment to prevent drug accumulation and life-threatening toxicities. Finally, concomitant chemotherapeutics, non-chemotherapeutic drugs, dietary intake, and complementary alternative medicines (e.g., milk thistle, garlic, St. John's wort)—used by up to 85% of patients without their physician's knowledge—can alter drug metabolism by affecting the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme system. This interaction either compromises efficacy or escalates toxicity. Consequently, the efficient use of antineoplastic agents relies heavily on analyzing these patient-specific parameters.
Referanslar
DeVita Jr VT, Chu ECr. A history of cancer chemotherapy. 2008;68(21):8643-53.
Lieu CH, Tan A-C, Leong S, Diamond JR, Eckhardt SG. From bench to bedside: lessons learned in translating preclinical studies in cancer drug development. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2013;105(19):1441-56.
Karlsson MO, Molnar V, Bergh J, Freijs A, Larsson R. A general model for time‐dissociated pharmacokinetic‐pharmacodynamic relationships exemplified by paclitaxel myelosuppression. Clinical Pharmacology Therapeutics 1998;63(1):11-25.
Xie R, Mathijssen RH, Sparreboom A, Verweij J, Karlsson MO. Clinical pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites in relation with diarrhea. Clinical Pharmacology Therapeutics 2002;72(3):265-75.
Keizer RJ, Huitema AD, Schellens JH, Beijnen JHC. Clinical pharmacokinetics of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Clinical pharmacokinetics. 2010;49(8):493-507.
Gelderblom H, Mross K, ten Tije AJ, Behringer D, Mielke S, van Zomeren DM, et al. Comparative pharmacokinetics of unbound paclitaxel during 1-and 3-hour infusions. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2002;20(2):574-81.
Undevia SD, Gomez-Abuin G, Ratain MJ. Pharmacokinetic variability of anticancer agents. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2005;5(6):447-58.
Gurney H. Dose calculation of anticancer drugs: a review of the current practice and introduction of an alternative. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1996;14(9):2590-611.
Baker SD, Verweij J, Rowinsky EK, Donehower RC, Schellens JH, Grochow LB, et al. Role of body surface area in dosing of investigational anticancer agents in adults, 1991–2001. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2002;94(24):1883-8.
Sparreboom A, Wolff AC, Mathijssen RH, Chatelut E, Rowinsky EK, Verweij J, et al. Evaluation of alternate size descriptors for dose calculation of anticancer drugs in the obese. Journal of clinical oncology. 2007;25(30):4707-13.
Veal GJ, Hartford CM, Stewart CF. Clinical pharmacology in the adolescent oncology patient. Journal of clinical oncology. 2010;28(32):4790.
Rahman A, White RM. Cytotoxic anticancer agents and renal impairment study: the challenge remains. Journal of clinical oncology. 2006;24(4):533-6.
Twelves C, Glynne-Jones R, Cassidy J, Schüller J, Goggin T, Roos B, et al. Effect of hepatic dysfunction due to liver metastases on the pharmacokinetics of capecitabine and its metabolites. Clinical cancer research. 1999;5(7):1696-702.
Wu K, House L, Ramírez J, Seminerio MJ, Ratain MJ. Evaluation of Utility of Pharmacokinetic Studies in Phase I Trials of Two Oncology DrugsUtility of Pharmacokinetic Drug–Drug Interaction Studies. Clinical Cancer Research. 2013;19(21):6039-43.
Hu S, Mathijssen R, de Bruijn P, Baker SD, Sparreboom A. Inhibition of OATP1B1 by tyrosine kinase inhibitors: in vitro–in vivo correlations. British journal of cancer. 2014;110(4):894-8.
DeMario MD, Ratain MJ. Oral chemotherapy: rationale and future directions. Journal of clinical oncology. 1998;16(7):2557-67.
Sparreboom A, Cox MC, Acharya MR, Figg WD. Herbal remedies in the United States: potential adverse interactions with anticancer agents. Journal of clinical oncology. 2004;22(12):2489-503.