Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi’nin (CBCT) Ortodontik Tedavilerde Kullanımı ve Üç Boyutlu Tedavi Planlamasına Entegrasyonu
Referanslar
Yoon DC, Mol A, Benn DK, Benavides E. Digital Radiographic Image Processing and Analysis. Dent Clin North Am. 2018;62(3):341-359. doi:10.1016/j.cden.2018.03.001.
Boeddinghaus R, Whyte A. Current concepts in maxillofacial imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2008;66(3):396-418. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.11.019
Jain S, Choudhary K, Nagi R, Shukla S, Kaur N, Grover D. New evolution of cone-beam computed tomography in dentistry: Combining digital technologies. Imaging Sci Dent. 2019;49(3):179-190. doi:10.5624/isd.2019.49.3.179.
Nemtoi A, Czink C, Haba D, Gahleitner A. Cone beam CT: a current overview of devices. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(8):20120443. doi:10.1259/dmfr.20120443
Kiljunen T, Kaasalainen T, Suomalainen A, Kortesniemi M. Dental cone beam CT: A review. Phys Med. 2015;31(8):844-860. doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.09.004.
White SC, Pharoah MJ. The evolution and application of dental maxillofacial imaging modalities. Dent Clin North Am. 2008;52(4):689-v. doi:10.1016/j.cden.2008.05.006.
Hayashi T, Arai Y, Chikui T, et al. Clinical guidelines for dental cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Radiol. 2018;34(2):89-104. doi:10.1007/s11282-018-0314-3.
De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GR. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38(6):609-625. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2009.02.028
Leonardi R. Cone-beam computed tomography and three-dimensional orthodontics. Where we are and future perspectives.J Orthod. 2019;46(1_suppl):45-48.doi:10.1177/1465312519840029
Coskun I, Kaya B. Cone beam computed tomography in ortho- dontics. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics 2018;31: 55–61.
Hujoel P, Hollender L, Bollen AM, Young JD, McGee M, Grosso A. Radiographs associated with one episode of orthodontic therapy. J Dent Educ. 2006;70(10):1061-1065.
Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone- beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1998; 8: 1558–64.
Hatcher DC. Operational principles for cone-beam computed tomography. J Am Dent Assoc 2010; 141(Suppl. 3): 3S–6S.
Kapila S, Farman AG. Craniofacial imaging in the 21st century. Proceedings of the 2002 COAST Conference, Asilomar Conference Center, Pacific Grove, California. Orthod Craniofac Res 2003; 6: 7–8.
Kapila S, Conley RS, Harrell WE Jr. The current status of cone beam computed tomography imaging in orthodontics. Dento- maxillofac Radiol 2011; 40: 24–34.
Kapila S. Contemporary concepts on cone-beam computed to- mography in orthodontics. In: Kapila S, ed. Cone beam com- puted tomography in orthodontics: indications, insights and innovations. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 2014. pp. 5–42
Celikoglu M, Kamak H, Oktay H. Investigation of transmigrated and impacted maxillary and mandibular canine teeth in an orthodontic patient population. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68(5):1001-1006. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.006
Grande T, Stolze A, Goldbecher H, Kahl-Nieke B. The displaced maxillary canine--a retrospective study. J Orofac Orthop. 2006;67(6):441-449. doi:10.1007/s00056-006-0616-7
Follin ME, Lindvall AM. Detection of lingual root resorptions in the intraoral radiographs. An experimental study. Swed Dent J. 2005;29(1):35-42.
Gavel V, Dermaut L. The effect of tooth position on the image of unerupted canines on panoramic radiographs. Eur J Orthod. 1999;21(5):551-560. doi:10.1093/ejo/21.5.551
Haney E, Gansky SA, Lee JS, et al. Comparative analysis of traditional radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography volumetric images in the diagnosis and treatment planning of maxillary impacted canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137(5):590-597. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.06.035
Bjerklin K, Ericson S. How a computerized tomography examination changed the treatment plans of 80 children with retained and ectopically positioned maxillary canines. Angle Orthod. 2006;76(1):43-51. doi:10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0043:HACTEC]2.0.CO;2
Honda K, Larheim TA, Maruhashi K, Matsumoto K, Iwai K. Osseous abnormalities of the mandibular condyle: diagnostic reliability of cone beam computed tomography compared with helical computed tomography based on an autopsy material. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35(3):152-157. doi:10.1259/dmfr/15831361.
Katakami K, Shimoda S, Kobayashi K, Kawasaki K. Histological investigation of osseous changes of mandibular condyles with backscattered electron images. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008;37(6):330-339. doi:10.1259/dmfr/93169617.
Arayasantiparb R, Mitrirattanakul S, Kunasarapun P, Chutimataewin H, Netnoparat P, Sae-Heng W. Association of radiographic and clinical findings in patients with temporomandibular joints osseous alteration. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(1):221-227. doi:10.1007/s00784-019-02945-6.
European Commission, Radiation protection no. 172. Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology (evidence based guidelines) a report prepared by the sedentexct project, 2012, http://www.sedentexct.eu/files/radiation_protection_172.pdf.
Al-Delayme RM, Al-Khen M. Skeletal relapse after mandibular set- back in bi max surgery: intraoral vertical ramus versus bilateral sag- ittal split osteotomies. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2014;13:471-477.
Bailey LJ, Proffit WR, White R Jr. Assessment of patients for or- thognathic surgery. Semin Orthod. 1999;5:209-222.
Panou E, Motro M, Ates M, Acar A, Erverdi N. Dimensional changes of maxillary sinuses and pharyngeal airway in Class III pa- tients undergoing bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Angle Orthod. 2013;83:824-831.
Loubele M, Bogaerts R, Van Dijck E, et al. Comparison between ef- fective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxil- lofacial applications. Eur J Radiol. 2009;71:461-468.
Ayoub AF, Mostafa YA, el-Mofty S. Soft tissue response to anterior maxillary osteotomy. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1991;6(3):183-190.
Dewan SK, Marjadi UK. Soft tissue changes in surgically treated cases of bimaxillary protrusion. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1983; 41, 116–118.
Kim JR, Son W S, Lee SG. A retrospective analysis of 20 surgically corrected bimaxillary protrusion patients. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 2002; 17: 23–27.
Lee RT, Kyi CS, Mack GJ. A controlled clinical trial of the effects of the Twin Block and Dynamax appli- ances on the hard and soft tissues. Eur J Orthod. 2007; 29: 272–282. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/ cjm004
Okudaira M, Kawamoto T, Ono T, Moriyama K. Soft-tissue changes in association with anterior maxil- lary osteotomy: a pilot study. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008; 12: 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006- 008-0121-9
Ho CT, Lin HH, Liou EJ, Lo LJ. Three-dimensional surgical simulation improves the planning for correction of facial prognathism and asymmetry: a qualitative and quantitative study. Sci Rep. 2017;7:40423.
Xia JJ, Gateno J, Teichgraeber JF. New clinical protocol to evaluate craniomaxillofacial deformity and plan surgical correction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:2093–106.
Farrell BB, Franco PB, Tucker MR. Virtual surgical planning in orthognathic surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2014;26:459–73.
Wu TY, Lin HH, Lo LJ, Ho CT. Postoperative outcomes of two- and three- dimensional planning in orthognathic surgery: a comparative study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017;70:1101–11.
Farrell BB. Evolving Management of Dentofa- cial Deformities with Digital Planning and Patient-Specific Fixation. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2020; 28: 59-71.
Lin HH, Lonic D, Lo LJ. 3D printing in orthognath- ic surgery - A literature review. J Formos Med As- soc 2018; 117: 547-558.
Zinser MJ, Mischkowski RA, Dreiseidler T, Thamm OC, Rothamel D, Zöller JE. Computer-assisted orthognathic surgery: waferless maxillary positioning, versatility, and accuracy of an image-guided visualisation display. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;51(8):827-833. doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.06.014
Popat H, Richmond S, Drage NA. New developments in: three-dimensional planning for orthognathic surgery [published correction appears in J Orthod. 2010 Dec;37(4):319. Drage, Nicholas A [added]] [published correction appears in J Orthod. 2010 Jun;37(2):140]. J Orthod. 2010;37(1):62-71. doi:10.1179/14653121042885
Meyer M, Nelson G. Preadjusted edgewise appliances: theory and practice. Am J Orthod. 1978;73(5):485–498.
Gardner S, Khosravi R, Detweiler M et al. 3D printing digitally planned in-direct bonding tray. Semin Orthod 2022; 28:61–72.
Grünheid T, Lee MS, Larson BE. Transfer accuracy of vinyl polysiloxane trays for indirect bonding. Angle Orthod. 2016;86(3):468-474. doi:10.2319/042415-279.1
Kwon SY, Kim Y, Ahn HW, Kim KB, Chung KR, Kim Sunny SH. Computer-Aided Designing and Manufacturing of Lingual Fixed Orthodontic Appliance Using 2D/3D Registration Software and Rapid Prototyping. Int J Dent 2014;2014:164164.
Maino BG, Mura P, Bednar J. Miniscrew implants: the spider screw anchorage system. Semin Orthod. 2005 11: 40–46.
Melsen B, Verna C. Miniscrew implants: the Aarhus anchorage system. Semin Orthod. 2005 11: 24–31.
Hedayati Z, Hashemi SM, Zamiri B, Fattahi HR. Anchorage value of surgical titanium screws in orthodontic tooth movement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;36(7):588-592. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2006.10.020.
Kuroda S, Yamada K, Deguchi T, Hashimoto T, Kyung HM, Takano-Yamamoto T. Root proximity is a major factor for screw failure in orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;131(4 Suppl):S68-S73. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.06.017.
Kravitz ND, Kusnoto B. Risks and complications of orthodontic miniscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;131(4 Suppl):S43-S51. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.027.
Cope JB. Temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics: a paradigm shift. Semin orthod. 2005 11: 3–9.
Kravitz N, Kusnoto B. Dual-Top Anchor Mini Orthoscrews: seminar manual—UIC Clinical Test Protocol. Rocky Mountain Orthotics. 2005 17–40.
Ohnishi H, Yagi T, Yasuda Y, Takada K. A mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage in a deep overbite case. Angle Orthod. 2005 May;75(3):444-52. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[444: AMFOAI]2.0.CO;2. PMID: 15898387.
Bae MJ, Kim JY, Park JT, et al. Accuracy of miniscrew surgical guides assessed from cone-beam computed tomography and digital models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;143(6):893-901. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.02.018.
Suzuki EY, Suzuki B. Accuracy of miniscrew implant placement with a 3-dimensional surgical guide. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Jun;66(6):1245-52. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2007.08.047.
Akdeniz BS, Çarpar Y, Arslan Çarpar K. Digital three-dimensional planning of orthodontic miniscrew anchorage: A literature review. J. Exp. Clin. Med. 2022; 39(1): 269-274.
Beretta M, Poli PP, Tansella S, Maiorana C. Virtually guided alveolar ridge reduction combined with computer-aided implant placement for a bimaxillary implant-supported rehabilitation: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;120(2):168-172. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.11.010.
Spector L. Computer-aided dental implant planning. Dent Clin N Am. 2008 52: 761–775.
Beretta M, Poli PP, Maiorana C. Accuracy of computer-aided template-guided oral implant placement: a prospective clinical study. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2014;44(4):184-193. doi:10.5051/jpis.2014.44.4.184.
Maino G, Paoletto E, Lombardo L, Siciliani G. MAPA: A new high-precision 3D method of palatalminiscrew placement. EJCO. 2015 3: 41–47.
De Gabriele O, Dallatana G, Riva R, Vasudavan S, Wilmes B. The easy driver for placement of palatal mini-implants and a maxillary expander in a single appointment. J Clin Orthod. 2017 Nov;51(11):728-737.
Kim SH, Choi YS, Hwang EH, Chung KR, Kook YA, Nelson G. Surgical positioning of orthodontic mini-implants with guides fabricated on models replicated with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Apr;131(4 Suppl):S82-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.027.
Cantarella D, Savio G, Grigolato L, et al. A New Methodology for the Digital Planning of Micro-Implant-Supported Maxillary Skeletal Expansion. Med Devices (Auckl). 2020;13:93-106. Published 2020 Mar 18. doi:10.2147/MDER.S247751
Gateno J, Xia J, Teichgraeber JF, Rosen A. A new technique for the creation of a computerized composite skull model. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61:222–7.
Uechi J, Okayama M, Shibata T, Muguruma T, Hayashi K, Endo K, Mizogu‐chi I. A novel method for the 3‐dimensional simulation of orthognathic surgery by using a multimodal image‐fusion technique. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006;130:786–98.
Swennen GR, Barth EL, Eulzer C, Schutyser F. The use of a new 3D splint and double CT scan procedure to obtain an accurate anatomic virtual augmented model of the skull. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;36:146–52.
Plooij JM, Maal TJ, Haers P, Borstlap WA, Kuijpers‐Jagtman AM, Berge
SJ. Digital three‐dimensional image fusion processes for planning and evaluating orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;40:341–52.
Rangel FA, Maal TJ, Berge SJ, Kuijpers‐Jagtman AM. Integration of digital dental casts in cone‐beam computed tomography scans. ISRN Dent 2012:949086.
Ye N, Long H, Xue J, Wang S, Yang X, Lai W. Integration accuracy of laser‐scanned dental models into maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography images of different voxel sizes with different segmenta‐ tion threshold settings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014;117:780–6.
Ludlow JB, Davies‐Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, Howerton WB. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i‐CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35:219–26.
Silva MA, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Bumann A, Visser H, Hirsch E. Conebeam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment plan‐ ning: a radiation dose evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133(640):e1‐5.
Brooks SL. CBCT dosimetry: orthodontic considerations. Semin Orthod. 2009;15:14–8.
Lee RJ, Weissheimer A, Pham J, Go L, de Menezes LM, Redmond WR, et al. Three‐dimensional monitoring of root movement during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015;147:132–42.
Lee RJ, Pi S, Park J, Nelson G, Hatcher D, Oberoi S. Three‐dimensional evaluation of root position at the reset appointment without radio‐ graphs: a proof‐of‐concept study. Prog Orthod. 2018;19:15.
Lee SC, Hwang HS, Lee KC. Accuracy of deep learning-based integrated tooth models by merging intraoral scans and CBCT scans for 3D evaluation of root position during orthodontic treatment. Prog Orthod. 2022;23(1):15. Published 2022 May 9. doi:10.1186/s40510-022-00410-x.
Malik OH, McMullin A, Waring DT. Invisible orthodon- tics part 1: invisalign. Dent Update. 2013;40:203–204. https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2013.40.3.203. 207-210, 213-205.
Invisalign(2023) https://www.invisalign.com/provider/ccpro6.0/cbct