Do They Constitute An Entity?: A Qualitative Examination on the Entitativity of Social Categories in Turkey

Abelson, R. P., Dasgupta, N., Park, J., & Banaji, M. R. (1998). Perceptions of the collective other. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 243–250. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_2

Adelman, L., Yogeeswaran, K., & Lickel, B. (2019). They’re all the same, sometimes: Prejudicial attitudes toward Muslims influence motivated judgments of entitativity and collective responsibility for an individual’s actions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 80, 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.10.002

Agadullina, E. R., & Lovakov, A. V. (2017). Understanding entitativity: Are there real differences between approaches? Psychology: Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 14(3), 536–554. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2017-3-536-554

Agadullina, E. R., & Lovakov, A. V. (2018). Are people more prejudiced towards groups that are perceived as coherent? A meta-analysis of the relationship between out-group entitativity and prejudice. British Journal of Psychology, 57(4), 703–731. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12256

Akbaş, G. (2010). Social identity and intergroup relations: The case of Alevis and Sunnis in Amasya. [Masters’ thesis, Middle East Technical University]. Turkish National Thesis Center.

Akboğa, S. (2020). Türkiye siyasî ve toplumsal hayatında başörtüsünün değişen anlamları [The varying meanings of headscarf in Turkish political and social life]. Liberal Düşünce Dergisi, 25(98), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.36484/liberal.692152

Aktan, T., & Bilim, G. (2016). Kadınlara yönelik kalıpyargıların içerikleri: Kalıpyargı İçeriği Modeli çerçevesinde bir inceleme [Contents of stereotypes toward woman subgroups: An investigation in the framework of Stereotype Content Model]. Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi, 4(8), 147–182. https://doi.org/10.7816/nesne-04-08-01

Aldıkaçtı Marshall, G. (2005). Ideology, progress, and dialogue: A comparison of feminist and Islamist women’s approaches to the issues of head covering and work in Turkey. Gender and Society, 19(1), 104–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243204271138

Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.

Altıntaş, H. (2003). The impact of political parties and urbanisation on the process of polarisation in the Turkish political system. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, 3(5), 1–32. Retrieved July 18, 2021, from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/auiibfd/issue/54583/744041

Andrews, P. A. (1992). Türkiye’de etnik gruplar [Ethnic groups in Turkey]. Ant Publications.

Arakelova, V. (2010). Ethno-religious communities: To the problem of identity markers. Iran & the Caucasus, 14(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1163/157338410X12743419189180

Armenta, B., Stroebe, K., Scheibe, S., Van Yperen, N., Stegeman, A., & Postmes, T. (2017). Permeability of group boundaries: Development of the concept and a scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(3), 418–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216688202

Aydin, M., Çelikpala, M., Yeldan, E., Güvenç, M., Zaim, O. Z., Hawks, B. B., Sokullu, E. C., Şenyuva, Ö. Yılmaz, O., & Tığlı, S. D. (2021). Kantitatif araştırma raporu: Türkiye siyasal sosyal eğilimler araştırması 2020. İstanbul, Kadir Has Üniversitesi Türkiye Çalışmaları Grubu, Akademetre ve Global Akademi. Retrieved June 27, 2021, from https://www.khas.edu.tr/sites/khas.edu.tr/files/inline-files/TEA2020_Tur_WEBRAPOR_1.pdf

Aydın, S. (2018). The emergence of Alevism as an ethno-religious identity. National Identities, 20, 9–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2016.1244521

Aytaç, S. E., & Çarkoğlu, A. (2019). Ethnicity and religiosity-based prejudice in Turkey: Evidence from a survey experiment. International Political Science Review, 40(1), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512117696333

Bagci, S. C., & Çelebi, E. (2017a). Cross-group friendships and outgroup attitudes among Turkish–Kurdish ethnic groups: Does perceived interethnic conflict moderate the friendship-attitude link? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47(2), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12413

Bağcı, S. C., & Çelebi, E. (2017b). Etnik ve ulusal kimlikler ile dış grup tutumları ilişkisinde çatışma algısı ve dış gruba sorumluluk yükleme [Ethnic and national identities: Links to outgroup attitudes via attribution of responsibility and perceived interethnic conflict]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 32(80), 63–79.

Bagci, S. C., Çelebi, E., & Karaköse, S. (2017). Discrimination towards ethnic minorities: How does it relate to majority group members’ outgroup attitudes and support for multiculturalism. Social Justice Research, 30(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-017-0281-6

Baysu, G., Coşkan, C., & Duman, Y. (2018). Can identification as Muslim increase support for reconciliation? The case of the Kurdish conflict in Turkey. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 64, 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.02.002

Bilali, R., Çelik, A. B., & Ok, E. (2014). Psychological asymmetry in minority–majority relations at different stages of ethnic conflict. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 43(Part B), 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.09.002

Bilali, R., Iqbal, Y., & Çelik, A. B. (2018). The role of national identity, religious identity, and intergroup contact on social distance across multiple social divides in Turkey. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 65, 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.04.007

BILGESAM (Bilge Adamlar Stratejik Araştırma Merkezi – Centre for Wise Men Strategic Research). (2014). Türkiye’de etnik, dini ve siyasi kutuplaşma. Bilgesam. Retrieved June 27, 2021, from https://docplayer.biz.tr/34873217-Turkiye-de-etnik-dini-ve-siyasi-kutuplasma.html

Bilgiç, M., Koydemir, F. S., & Akyürek, S. (2014). Türkiye’de kimlikler arası kutuplaşmanın sosyal mesafe üzerinden ölçümü ve toplumsal güvenliğe etkisi [Measuring polarization among identity groups in Turkey through social distance and its effect on societal security]. Bilge Strateji, 6(11), 163–205.

Blanchard, A. L., Caudill, L. E., & Walker, L. S. (2020). Developing an entitativity measure and distinguishing it from antecedents and outcomes within online and face-to-face groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 23(1), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217743577

Bougie, E., Usborne, E., de la Sablonnière, R., & Taylor, D. M. (2011). The cultural narratives of Francophone and Anglophone Quebecers: Using a historical perspective to explore the relationships among collective relative deprivation, in-group entitativity, and collective esteem. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(4), 726–746. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466610X526018

Bornstein, G. (1992). The free-rider problem in intergroup conflicts over step-level and continuous public goods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(4), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.4.597

Brader, T., Valentino, N. A., & Suhay, E. (2008). What triggers public opposition to immigration? Anxiety, group cues, and immigration threat. American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 959–978. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00353.x

Brewer, M. B., Hong, Y.-Y., & Li, Q. (2004). Dynamic entitativity: Perceiving groups as actors. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity and essentialism (pp. 25–38). Psychology Press.

Brewer, M. B., Weber, J. G., & Carini, B. (1995). Person memory in intergroup contexts: Categorization versus individuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.1.29

Brown, R. (2000). Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30(6), 745–778. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1099-0992(200011/12)3063.0.CO;2-O

Brown, R. (2010). Prejudice: Its social psychology (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

Brown, R., & Pehrson, S. (2020). Group processes: Dynamics and within and between groups (3rd ed.). Blackwell.

Bükün, M. F., & Cingöz-Ulu, B. (2017). Alevilerin iç-grup yanlılığında kimlikle özdeşleşme ve toplumsal belleğin rolü [The role of collective memory and social identity in Alevis’ in-group bias]. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 20, 45–58.

Callahan, S. P., & Ledgerwood, A. (2016). On the psychological function of flags and logos: Group identity symbols increase perceived entitativity. Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes, 110(4), 528–550. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000047

Camcı, Y. (2015). Başörtülü ve başörtüsüz öğrencilerde dış grup tarafgirliği fenomeni: Açık ve örtük tutumların gruplar arası ilişkiler kuramları üzerinden incelenmesi. [Master’s thesis, Uludağ University]. Turkish National Thesis Center.

Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830030103

Çarkoğlu, A. (2005). Political preferences of the Turkish electorate: Reflections of an Alevi-Sunni cleavage. Turkish Studies on Religion and Politics in Turkey, 6(2), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683840500119593

Çarkoğlu, A. (2010). Public attitudes towards the türban ban in Turkey. Utrecht Law Review, 6(2), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.128

Çarkoğlu, A., & Kalaycıoğlu, E. (2009). Türkiye’de toplumsal eşitsizlik 2009. Sabancı University.

Carron, A. V., & Brawley, L. R. (2000). Cohesion: Conceptual and measurement issues. Small Group Research, 31(1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640003100105

Castano, E. (2004). On the advantages of reifying the ingroup. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism (pp. 381–400). Psychology Press.

Castano, E., Sacchi, S., & Gries, P. H. (2003). The perception of the other in international relations: Evidence for the polarizing effect of entitativity. Political Psychology, 24(3), 449–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00336

Castano, E., Yzerbyt, V., & Bourguignon, D. (2003). We are one and I like it: The impact of ingroup entitativity on ingroup identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(6), 735–754. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.175

Castano, E., Yzerbyt, V., Paladino, M.-P., & Sacchi, S. (2002). I belong, therefore, I exist: Ingroup identification, ingroup entitativity, and ingroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(2), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202282001

Çelebi, E., Verkuyten, M., Köse, T., & Maliepaard, M. (2014). Out-group trust and conflict understandings: The perspective of Turks and Kurds in Turkey. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 40, 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.02.002

Çelebi, E., Verkuyten, M., & Smyrnioti, N. (2016). Support for Kurdish language rights in Turkey: The roles of ethnic group, group identifications, contact, and intergroup perceptions. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39(6), 1034–1051. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2015.1103881

Çelik, A. B., & Blum, A. (2007). Track II interventions and the Kurdish question in Turkey: An analysis using a theories of change approach. International Journal of Peace Studies, 12(2), 51–81. Retrieved September 13, 2021, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/41852962

Çelik, A. B., & Kantowitz, R. (2009). Trauma and forgiveness: Comparing experiences from Turkey and Guatemala. In S. Bloch-Schulman, & D. White (Eds.), Forgiveness: Probing the boundaries (pp. 179–190). Inter-Disciplinary Press.

Çelik, A. B., Bilali, R., & Iqbal, Y. (2017). Patterns of ‘Othering’ in Turkey: A study of ethnic, ideological, and sectarian polarization. South European Society and Politics, 22(2), 217–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2016.1250382

Choi, V., Jackson, J., & Gelfand, M. (2018). The role of entitativity in perpetuating cycles of violence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, E196. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X18002042

Ciddi, S. (2008). The Republican People’s Party and the 2007 general elections: Politics of perpetual decline? Turkish Studies, 9(3), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683840802267413

Ciddi, S., & Esen, B. (2014). Turkey’s Republican People’s Party: Politics of opposition under a dominant party system. Turkish Studies, 15(3), 419–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2014.954745

Coşkun, H. (2019). Institution of “Musahiplik” in the Alevi-Bektashi tradition (Tokat Turkmen Alevis’ example). In C. Aslan, & Ö. Aydoğmuş Ördem (Eds.), Social science I (pp. 207–224). Akademisyen Kitapevi.

Çörekçioğlu, G. (2021). Unveiling the effects of a headscarf ban: Evidence from municipal jobs in Turkey. Journal of Comparative Economics, 49(2), 382–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2020.09.004

Crawford, M. T., & Salaman, L. (2012). Entitativity, identity, and the fulfilment of psychological needs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 726–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.015

Crawford, M. T., Sherman, S. J., & Hamilton, D. L. (2002). Perceived entitativity, stereotype formation, and the interchangeability of group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1076–1094. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1076

Crisp, R. J., & Turner, R. N. (2009). Can imagined interactions produce positive perceptions?: Reducing prejudice through simulated social contact. American Psychologist, 64(4), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014718

Crump, S. A., Hamilton, D. L., Sherman, S. J., Lickel, B., & Thakkar, V. (2010). Group entitativity and similarity: Their differing patterns in perceptions of groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(7), 1212–1230. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.716

Dang, J., Liu, L., Ren, D., & Gu, Z. (2018). “Groupy” allies are more beneficial while “Groupy” enemies are more harmful. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(8), 925–934. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617729409

Dang, J., Liu, L., Ren, D., & Su, Q. (2018). Polarization and positivity effects: Divergent roles of group entitativity in warmth and competence judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.09.003

Dasgupta, N., Banaji, M. R., & Abelson, R. P. (1999). Group entitativity and group perception: Associations between physical features and psychological judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(5), 991–1003. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.991

Dayioglu, M., & Kirdar, M. G. (2010). Determinants of and trends in labour force participation of women in Turkey. Working Papers 5, State Planning Organization of the Republic of Turkey and World Bank Welfare and Social Policy Analytical Work Program.

De keersmaecker, J., & Roets, A. (2017). Group-centrism in the absence of group norms: The role of need for closure in social projection. Motivation and Emotion, 41, 591–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-017-9630-x

Deaux, K., Reid, A., Mizrahi, K., & Ethier, K. A. (1995). Parameters of social identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(2), 280–291. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.280

Demoulin, S., Leyens, J., & Yzerbyt, V. (2006). Lay theories of essentialism. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430206059856

Denson, T. F., Lickel, B., Curtis, M., Stenstrom, D. M., & Ames, D. R. (2006). The roles of entitativity and essentiality in judgments of collective responsibility. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9(1), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430206059857

Dildar, Y. (2015). Patriarchal norms, religion, and female labour supply: Evidence from Turkey. World Development, 76, 40–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.06.010

Dixon, J. C., & Ergin, M. (2010). Explaining anti-Kurdish beliefs in Turkey: Group competition, identity, and globalization. Social Science Quarterly, 91(1), 1329–1348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00734.x

Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., Isen, A. M., & Lowrance, R. (1995). Group representations and intergroup bias: Positive affect, similarity, and group size. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(8), 856–865. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295218009

Duman, B. (2013). Yoğun göç almış metropollerde etniklik ve öteki ile ilişki [Ethnicity and relation with the other in immigrant intensive metropolitan cities]. Sosyoloji Dergisi, 27(3), 1–24.

Duman, B., & Alacahan, O. (2011). Etniklik ve sosyal kaynaşma ilişkisi: Adana örneği [The relation between ethnicity and social cohesion: The case of Adana]. C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 12(1), 223–244.

Durmaz, A. (2015). Alevi ve Sünnilerde sosyal kimlik ve önyargı (Malatya örneği). [Masters’ thesis, Dicle University]. Turkish National Thesis Center.

Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngäs, H. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: A focus on trustworthiness. SAGE Open, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014522633

Elo, S., & Kyngas, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x

Erdemir, A. (2005). Tradition and modernity: Alevis’ ambiguous terms and Turkey’s ambivalent subjects. Middle Eastern Studies, 41(6), 937–951. https://doi.org/10.1080/00263200500262033

Erdoğan, E. (2020). Türkiye’de kutuplaşmanın boyutları 2020 araştırması. Retrieved 16 July, 2021, from https://www.turkuazlab.org/ilgili-projelerimiz/turkiyede-kutuplasmanin-boyutlari-2020/

Erişen, C., & Erdoğan, E. (2019). Growing perceived threat and prejudice as sources of intolerance: Evidence from the 2015 Turkish general elections. Turkish Studies, 20(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2018.1488592

Erman, T. & Göker, E. (2000). Alevi politics in contemporary Turkey. Middle Eastern Studies, 36(4), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/00263200008701334

Esen, B., & Gumuscu, S. (2020). Why did Turkish democracy collapse? A political economy account of AKP’s authoritarianism. Party Politics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068820923722

Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage.

Filiztekin, A. (2009). Regional unemployment in Turkey. Regional Science, 88(4), 863–878. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2009.00237.x

Fiske, S. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology: Vols. 1 and 2 (4th ed., pp. 357–411). McGraw-Hill.

Forsyth, D. R. (2019). Group dynamics (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Frey, L. R., & Konieczka, S. P. (2010). Group identity. In R. L. Jackson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of identity (Vol. 1, pp. 316–319). Sage.

Gaertner, L., & Schopler, J. (1998). Perceived ingroup entitativity and ingroup bias: An interconnection of self and others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(6), 963–980. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(1998110)28:6<963::AID-EJSP905>3.0.CO;2-S

Gaertner, L., Iuzzini, J., Witt, M. G., & Oriña, M. M. (2006). Us without them: Evidence for an intragroup origin of positive in-group regard. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(3), 426–439. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.426

Gökarıksel, B. (2009). Beyond the officially sacred: religion, secularism, and the body in the production of subjectivity. Social & Cultural Geography, 10(6), 657–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360903068993

Göksel, İ. (2013). Female labor force participation in Turkey: The role of conservatism. Women’s Studies International Forum, 41, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2013.04.006

Gölbaşı, H. (2008). Modernleşmeyi engelleyen arkaik bir çatışma sorunu: Alevi-Sünni çatışmasının arka planı [An archaic conflict problem that blocks modernizing: The background of Alevism- Sunnite conflict]. C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 9(1), 39–61.

Goldin, C. (1995). The U-shaped female labor force function in economic development and economic history. In T. P. Schultz (Ed.), Investment in women’s human capital and economic development (pp. 61–90). University of Chicago Press.

Gould, C. C. (2004). Globalizing democracy and human rights. Cambridge University Press.

Göle, N. (1996). The forbidden modern: Civilization and veiling. University of Michigan Press.

Göle, N. (1997). The gendered nature of the public sphere. Public Culture, 10(1), 61–81. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-10-1-61

Göner, Ö. (2005). The transformation of the Alevi collective identity. Cultural Dynamics, 17(2), 107–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0921374005058582

Grigoriadis, I. N. (2009). Islam and democratization in Turkey: Secularism and trust in a divided society. Democratization, 16(6), 1194–1213. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340903271803

Gumuscu, S. (2010). Class, status, and party: The changing face of political Islam in Turkey and Egypt. Comparative Political Studies, 43(7), 835–861. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414010361341

Gündoğan, E. (2019). The AKP government from its formation to the popular uprising in June 2013 (Part I). European Review, 27(4), 468–489. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798719000140

Gündoğan, E. (2020). The AKP government from its formation to the popular uprising in June 2013 (Part II) – With some reflections on what has happened in Turkey since. European Review, 28(1), 132–153. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798719000322

Gündüz-Hoşgör, A., & Smits, J. (2008). Variation in the employment status of women in Turkey. Women’s Studies International Forum, 31(2), 104–117. 10.1016/j.wsif.2008.03.003

Gürsoy, Y. (2012). The changing role of the military in Turkish Politics: Democratization through coup plots? Democratization, 19(4), 735–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.623352

Haidt, J., & Kesebir, S. (2010). Morality. In S. Fiske, D. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 797–832). Wiley.

Hamilton, D. L. (2007). Understanding the complexities of group perception: Broadening the domain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(6), 1077–1101. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.436

Hamilton, D. L., Chen, J. M., & Way, N. (2011). Dynamic aspects of entitativity: From group perceptions to social interaction. In R. Kramer, G. Leonardelli, & R. Livingston (Eds.), Social cognition, social identity, and intergroup relations: A festschrift in honor of Marilynn B. Brewer (pp. 27–52). Psychology Press.

Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103(2), 336–355. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.336

Hamilton, D. L., Sherman, S. J., Crump, S. A., & Spencer-Rodgers, J. (2009). The role of entitativity in stereotyping: Processes and parameters. In T. D. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 179–198). Taylor & Francis.

Hamilton, D. L., Sherman, S. J., & Lickel, B. (1998). Perceiving social groups: The importance of the entitativity continuum. In C. Sedikides, J. Schopler & C. A. Insko (Eds.), Intergroup cognition and intergroup behavior (pp. 47–74). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Hamilton, D. L., Sherman, S. J., & Rodgers, J. S. (2004). Perceiving the groupness of groups: Entitativity, homogeneity, essentialism, and stereotypes. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism (pp. 39–60). Psychology Press.

Hamilton, D.L., & Van Acker, K. (2010). Entitativity. In J. M. Levine, & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Encyclopedia of group processes and intergroup relations (pp. 238–241). Sage.

Haqanee, Z., Lou, E., & Lalonde, R. N. (2014). Essentialist and entitative beliefs in relation to prejudice towards mental disorders. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44(2), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12249

Haslam, N., Rothschild, L., & Ernst, D. (2000). Essentialist beliefs about social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(1), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466600164363

Haslam, N., Rothschild, L., & Ernst, D. (2004). Essentialism and entitativity: Structures of beliefs about the ontology of social categories. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity and essentialism (pp. 61–78). Psychology Press.

Herrera, M., & Sani, F. (2013). Why does ingroup identification shield people from death anxiety? The role of perceived collective continuity and group entitativity. Social Psychology, 44(5), 320–328. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000128

Hodson, G., & Skorska, M. (2015). Tapping generalized essentialism to predict outgroup prejudice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(2), 371–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12083

Hogg, M. A. (2010). Self-categorization theory. In J. M. Levine, & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Encyclopedia of group processes and intergroup relations (pp. 728–731). Sage.

Hogg, M. A., Meehan, C., & Farquharson, J. (2010). The solace of radicalism: Self-uncertainty and group identification in the face of threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1061–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.005

Hogg, M. A., Sherman, D. K., Dierselhuis, J., Maitner, A. T., & Moffitt, G. (2007). Uncertainty, entitativity, and group identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(1), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.12.008

Hortaçsu, N. (2000). Intergroup relations in a changing political context: The case of veiled and unveiled university students in Turkey. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30(5), 733–744. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0992(200009/10)30:5<733::AID-EJSP21>3.0.CO;2-M

Hutchinson, J., & Smith, A. D. (1996). Ethnicity. Oxford University Press.

İlkkaracan, İ., Kim, K., & Kaya. T. (2015). Sosyal bakım hizmetlerini kamu yatırımlarının istihdam, toplumsal cinsiyet eşitliği ve yoksulluğa etkileri: Türkiye örneği. İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Bilim, Mühendislik ve Teknolojide Kadın Araştırmaları ve Uygulama Merkezi Raporu, İstanbul.

Igarashi, T., & Kashima, Y. (2011). Perceived entitativity of social networks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(6), 1048–1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.04.008

Ip, G. W., Chiu, C., & Wan, C. (2006). Birds of a feather and birds flocking together: Physical versus behavioral cues may lead to trait versus goal-based group perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(3), 368–381. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.368

Jans, L., Postmes, T., & Van der Zee, K. I. (2011). The induction of shared identity: The positive role of individual distinctiveness for groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(8), 1130–1141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211407342

John, O. P., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2000). Measurement: Reliability, construct validation, and scale construction. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 339–369). Cambridge University Press.

Johnson, A. L., Crawford, M. T., Sherman, S. J., Rutchick, A. M., Hamilton, D. L., & Ferreira, M. (2006). A functional perspective on group memberships: Differential need fulfillment in a group typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(6), 707–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.08.002

Kabasakal, H., Karakaş, F., Maden, C., & Aycan, Z. (2004). Women in management in Turkey: Challenges, hopes, and progress. In R. Davidson & M. J. Burke (Eds.), Women in management worldwide: Progress and prospects (pp. 273–293). Ashgate Aldershot.

Kağnıcıoğlu, D. (2017). The role of women in working life in Turkey. Sustainable Development and Planning, 226, 349–358. https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP170301

Kalaycıoğlu, E. (2005). The mystery of the türban: Participation or revolt? Turkish Studies, 6(2), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683840500119577

Karademir, A., & Şen, M. (2021). The case of Alevis in Turkey: A challenge to liberal multiculturalism. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 21(1), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2020.1857075

Karaosmanoğlu, K. (2013). Beyond essentialism: Negotiating Alevi identity in urban Turkey. Identities, 20(5), 580–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2013.823088

Karolewski, J. (2008). What is heterodox about Alevism? The development of anti-Alevi discrimination and resentment. Die Welt des Islam, 48(3-4), 434–456. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006008X364767

Kashima, Y. (2004). Culture, communication, and entitativity: A social psychological investigation of social reality. In V. Y. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity and essentialism (pp. 193–205). Psychology Press.

Kashima, Y., Kashima, E., Chiu, C.-Y., Farsides, T., Gelfand, M., Hong, Y.-Y., Kim, U., Strack, F., Werth, L., Yuki, M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). Culture, essentialism, and agency: Are individuals universally believed to be more real entities than groups? European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(2), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.237

Kaya, H. E. (2009). An overview of Turkish women’s status in Turkey. Toplum ve Demokrasi, 2(5), 211–219.

Keller, J. (2005). In genes we trust: The biological component of psychological essentialism and its relationship to mechanisms of motivated social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(4), 686–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.686

Kemahlıoğlu, Ö. (2015). Winds of change? The June 2015 parliamentary election in Turkey. South European Society and Politics, 20(4), 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2015.1115581

Kentel, F., Ahıska, M., & Genç, F. (2007). “Milletin bölünmez bütünlüğü”: Demokratikleşme sürecinde parçalayan milliyetçilik(ler) [The indivisible unity of the nation: Nationalisms that tear us apart in democratization process]. TESEV. Retrieved July 27, 2021, from https://www.tesev.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/rapor_Milletin_Bolunmez_Butunlugu_Demokratiklesme_Surecinde_Parcalayan_Milliyetcilik.pdf

Kinzler, K. D., Shutts, K., & Correll, J. (2010). Priorities in social categories. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 581–592. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.739

Knowles, M. L., & Gaertner, W. L. (2008). Benefits of membership: The activation and amplification of group identities in response to social rejection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(9), 1200–1213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208320062

Koc, İ., Hancioglu, A., & Cavlin, A. (2008). Demographic differentials and demographic integration of Turkish and Kurdish populations in Turkey. Population Research and Policy Review, 27, 447–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-008-9072-y

Koçan, G., & Öncü, A. (2004). Citizen Alevi in Turkey: Beyond confirmation and denial. Journal of Historical Sociology, 17(4), 464–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6443.2004.00240.x

KONDA. (2006). Biz kimiz? Toplumsal yapı araştırması. Retrieved July 18, 2021, from https://konda.com.tr/tr/rapor/biz-kimiz-toplumsal-yapi-arastirmasi/

KONDA. (2010). Toplumda, siyasette kutuplaşma. Retrieved July 19, 2021, from https://konda.com.tr/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/2010_06_KONDA_Toplumda_Siyasette_Kutuplasma.pdf

KONDA. (2011). Kürt meselesi’nde algı ve beklentiler. Retrieved July 18, 2021, from https://konda.com.tr/tr/rapor/kurt-meselesinde-algi-ve-beklentiler/

KONDA. (2014). Kasım 2014 barometresi. Retrieved July 19, 2021, from https://konda.com.tr/tr/rapor/bir-arada-yasamak/

KONDA. (2019). Türkiye’de kutuplaşma, Ocak 2019. Retrieved June 27, 2021, from https://konda.com.tr/tr/rapor/turkiyede-kutuplasma/

Kramer, R. M., & Brewer, M. B. (1984). Effects of group identity on resource use in a simulated commons dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(5), 1044–1057. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.5.1044

Kurebayashi, K., Hoffman, L., Ryan, C. S., & Murayama, A. (2012). Japanese and American perceptions of group entitativity and autonomy: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(2), 349–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022110388566

Kurt Topuz, S, & Erkanlı, H. (2016). Toplumsal cinsiyet bağlamında kadın ve erkeğe atfedilen anlamların metafor yöntemiyle analizi [Metaphor analysis of meanings attributed to women and men in the context gender]. Alternatif Politika, 8(2), 300–321.

Kuşdil, M. E., & Günbay, N. (2014). The relationships between in- and out-group perceptions and evaluations, and the social identity dimensions of covered/uncovered female students in Turkey. Mediterrean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(23), 1632–1641. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n23p1632

Lakens, D. (2010). Movement synchrony and perceived entitativity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(5), 701–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.015

Lakens, D., & Stel, M. (2011). If they move in sync, they must feel in sync: Movement synchrony leads to attributed feelings of rapport. Social Cognition, 29(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1212/soco.2011.29.1.1

Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (Eds.). (2006). Small groups. Psychology Press.

Lewin, K. (1939). Field theory and experiment in social psychology: Concepts and methods. American Journal of Sociology, 44(6), 868–896. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/218177

Licata, L., Klein, O., Saade, W., Azzi, A. E., & Branscombe, N. R. (2012). Perceived out-group (Dis)continuity and attribution of responsibility for the Lebanese Civil War mediate effects of national and religious subgroup identification on intergroup attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15(2), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211414445

Lickel, B., Hamilton, D. L., Wieczorkowska, G., Lewis, A., Sherman, S. J., & Uhles, A. N. (2000). Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.223

Lickel, B., Miller, N., Stenstrom, D. M., Denson, T. F., & Schmader, T. (2006). Vicarious retribution: The role of collective blame in intergroup aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(4), 372–390. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_6

Lickel, B., Schmader, T., & Hamilton, D. L. (2003). A case of collective responsibility: Who else was to blame for the Columbine High School shootings? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(2), 194–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202239045

Lukács, G. (1967). Reification and the consciousness of the proletariat. In History and class consciousness. Merlin. (Original work published in 1923). http://www.marxists.org/archive/lukacs/works/history/hcc05.htm

McGarty, C., Haslam, S. A., Hutchinson, K. J., & Grace, D. M. (1995). Determinants of perceived consistency: The relationship between group entitativity and the meaningfulness of categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34(3), 237–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1995.tb01061.x

Medin, D. (1989). Concepts and conceptual structure. American Psychologist, 44(12), 1469–1481. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.12.1469

Moscatelli, S., & Rubini, M. (2013). The impact of group entitativity on negative outcome allocations. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2012.712068

Moreland, R. L. (2010). Are dyads really groups? Small Group Research, 41(2), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496409358618

Newheiser, A.-K., & Dovidio, J. F. (2012). Individual differences and intergroup bias: Divergent dynamics associated with prejudice and stereotyping. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(1), 70–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.02.024

Newheiser, A.-K., Sawaoka, T., & Dovidio, J. F. (2012). Why do we punish groups? High entitativity promotes moral suspicion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 931–936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.013

Newheiser, A.-K., Tausch, N., Dovidio, J. F., & Hewstone, M. (2009). Entitativity and prejudice: Examining their relationship and the moderating effect of attitude certainty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 920–926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.024

No, S., Hong Y. Y., Liao H. Y., Lee K., Wood D., & Chao M. M. (2008). Lay theory of race affects and moderates Asian American’ responses toward American culture. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(4), 991–1004. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012978

Pagliaro, S., Alparone, F. R., Picconi, L., Paolini, D., & Aquino, A. (2013). Group based resiliency: Contrasting the negative effects of threat to the ingroup. Current Research in Social Psychology, 21(4), 35–41.

Pehrson, S., Brown, R., & Zagefka, H. (2009). When does national identification lead to the rejection of immigrants? Cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence for the role of essentialist in-group definitions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608X288827

Pereira, A., & Van Prooijen, J.-W. (2018). Why we sometimes punish the innocent: The role of group entitativity in collective punishment. PLoS ONE, 13(5), Article e0196852. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196852

Phelps, J. M., Ommundsen, R., Türken, S., & Ulleberg, P. (2013). Intergroup perception and proactive majority integration attitudes. Social Psychology, 44(3), 196–207. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000104

Poyraz, B. (2005). The Turkish state and the Alevis: Changing parameters of an uneasy relationship. Middle Eastern Studies, 41(4), 503–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/00263200500119233

Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (2007). Psychological essentialism of human categories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(4), 202–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00504.x

Psarchapoulos, G., & Tzannatos, Z. (1989). Female labor force participation: An international perspective. World Bank Research Observer, 4(2), 187–201.

Rabbie, J. M., & Horwitz, M. (1988). Categories versus groups as explanatory concepts in intergroup relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(2), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180204

Roets, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2011). The role of need for closure in essentialist entitativity beliefs and prejudice: An epistemic needs approach to racial categorization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(1), 52–73. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466610X491567

Rogier, A., & Yzerbyt, V. (1999). Social attribution, correspondence bias, and the emergence of stereotypes. Swiss Journal of Psychology / Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Revue Suisse de Psychologie, 58(4), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185.58.4.233

Rothbart, M., & Park, B. (2004). The mental representation of social categories: Category boundaries, entitativity, and stereotype change. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity and essentialism (pp. 79–100). Psychology Press.

Rothgerber, H. (1997). External intergroup threat as an antecedent to perceptions in in-group and out-group homogeneity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(6), 1206–1212. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1206

Ross, C. E. (1987). The division of labor at home. Social Forces, 65(3), 816–833. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/65.3.816

Rubini, M., Moscatelli, S., & Palmonari, A. (2007). Increasing group entitativity: Linguistic intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10(2), 280–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430207075156

Rutchick, A. M., Hamilton, D. L., & Sack, J. D. (2008). Antecedents of entitativity in categorically and dynamically construed groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(6), 905–921. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.555

Rydell, R. J., & McConnell, A. R. (2005). Perceptions of entitativity and attitude change. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(1), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271316

Sacchi, S., Castano, E., & Brauer, M. (2009). Perceiving one’s nation: Entitativity, agency and security in the international arena. International Journal of Psychology, 44(5), 321–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590802236233

Sahn, R. (2013). The dangers of reification. Retrieved June 27, 2021, from https://contraryperspective.com/2013/06/06/the-dangers-of-reification/

Saktanber, A., & Çorbacıoğlu, G. (2008). Veiling and headscarf-skepticism in Turkey. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 15(4), 514–538. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxn018

Sani, F., Bowe, M., & Herrera, M. (2008). Perceived collective continuity and social well-being: Exploring the connections. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(2), 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.461

Sani, F., Bowe, M., Herrera, M., Manna, C., Cossa, T., Miao, X., & Zhou, Y. (2007). Perceived collective continuity: Seeing groups as entities that move through time. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(6), 1118–1134. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.430

Saraçoğlu, C. (2009). ‘Exclusive recognition’: The new dimensions of the question of ethnicity and nationalism in Turkey. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 32(4), 640–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870802065226

Sarigil, Z. (2018). Ethnic and religious prejudices in the Turkish social landscape. European Sociological Review, 34(6), 711–727. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcy036

Sarigil, Z., & Karakoc, E. (2017). Inter-ethnic (in)tolerance between Turks and Kurds: Implications for Turkish democratization. South European Society and Politics, 22(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2016.1164846

Schepisi, M., Porciello, G., Bufalari, I., Aglioti, S. M., & Panasiti, M. S. (2019). Left threatened by right: Political intergroup bias in the contemporary Italian context. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 26. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00026

Seggie, F. N. (2015). Academic and cultural experiences of covered women in Turkish higher education. Comparative Education, 51(4), 575–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2015.1081795

Seggie, F. N., & Austin, A. E. (2010). Impact of the headscarf ban policy on the identity development of part time unveilers in Turkish higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 51(5), 564–583. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2010.0012

Şen, M. (2018). Redefining the minority: The case of Alevis in Turkey. In S. Jassal & H. Turan (Eds.), New perspectives on India and Turkey: Connections and debate (pp. 127–137). Routledge.

SETA. (2009). Public perception of the Kurdish question in Turkey. SETA & Pollmark. Retrieved July 27, 2021, from http://setadc.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/SETA_Research_Report_Public_Perception_Kurdish_Question.pdf

SETA. (2019). The March 31 local elections in Turkey. Retrieved August 9, 2021, from https://setav.org/en/assets/uploads/2019/03/50.-Analysis.pdf

Sever, G. (2014). Predictors of prejudice against different types of head-covering practices. [Masters’ thesis, Boğaziçi University]. Turkish National Thesis Center.

Shankland, D. (2003). The Alevis in Turkey: The emergence of a secular Islamic tradition. Routledge Curzon.

Sherman, S. J., Castelli, L., & Hamilton, D. L. (2002). The spontaneous use of a group typology as an organizing principle in memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 328–342. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.328

Shindeldecker, J. (2006). Turkish Alevis today. Şahkulu.

Stenstrom, D. M., Lickel, B., Denson, T. F., & Miller, N. (2008). The roles of ingroup identification and outgroup entitativity in intergroup retribution. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(11), 1570–1582. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208322999

Şirin, Ç. V. (2013). Analyzing the determinants of group identity among Alevis in Turkey: A national survey study. Turkish Studies, 14(1), 74–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2013.766983

Sirkeci, I. (2000). Exploring the Kurdish population in the Turkish context. GENUS, An International Journal of Demography, 56(1-2), 149–175. Available at SSRN: https://www.jstor.org/stable/29788634

Smith, A. (2001). Nationalism: Theory, ideology, history. Polity Press.

Smits, J. & Gündüz-Hoşgör, A. (2003). Linguistic capital: Language as a socio-economic resource among Kurdish and Arabic women in Turkey. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 26(5), 829–853. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141987032000109050

Spencer-Rodgers, J., Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (2007). The central role of entitativity in stereotypes of social categories and task groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(3), 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.369

Spencer-Rodgers, J., Williams, M. J., Hamilton, D. L., Peng, K., & Wang, L. (2007). Culture and group perception: Dispositional and stereotypic inferences about novel and national groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(4), 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.525

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel, & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall.

Tajfel, H., Billig, M., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420010202

Taşkın, B. (2021). The 2019 provincial elections in Turkey: AKP’s struggle to retain power vis-a-vis a revitalized CHP. Regional & Federal Studies, 31(3), 461–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2020.1858811

Taspinar, O. (2014). The end of the Turkish model. Survival, 56(2), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2014.901732

Tatli, A., Özbilgin, M. F., & Küskü, F. (2008). Gendered occupational outcomes from multilevel perspectives: The case of professional training and work in Turkey. In H. M. G. Watt & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Gender and occupational outcomes: Longitudinal assessments of individual, social, and cultural influences (pp. 267–297). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11706-010

TDK. (n.d.). Alevi. In Güncel Türkçe sözlük. Retrieved July 18, 2021, from https://sozluk.gov.tr/?q=alevi&aranan=

Tekeli, Ş. (1982). Kadınlar ve siyasal toplumsal hayat [Women and sociopolitical life]. Birikim Yayınları.

Thurston, J. A. (2012). Exploring group perception: The relationship between the perception of entitativity and assessments of cohesion (Publication No. 3553785) [Doctoral dissertation, University of California: Santa Barbara]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.

Toprak, B. (1994). Women and fundamentalism: The case of Turkey. V. M. Moghadam (Ed.), Identity politics and women: Cultural reassertions and feminisms in international perspective (pp. 293–304). Westview Press.

Toprak, B., Bozan, İ., Morgül, T. & Şener, N. (2009). Türkiye’de farklı olmak: Din ve muhafazakarlık ekseninde ötekileştirilenler [Being different in Turkey: Religion, conservatism, and otherization]. Metis Yayınları.

Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Basil Blackwell.

Turner, J. C., & Reynolds, K. J. (2001). The social identity perspective in intergroup relations: Theories, themes and controversies. In R. Brown, & S. Gaertner(Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Vol. 4. Intergroup relations (pp. 133–152). Blackwell Publishers.

Turner, J. C., & Reynolds, K. J. (2012). Self-categorization theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol 2, pp. 399–417). Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.n46

Vaismoradi, M., Bondas. T., & Turunen, H. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Journal of Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048

Van Bruinessen, M. (1997). “Aslını inkar eden haramzadedir!”: The debate on the ethnic identity of the Kurdish Alevis. In K. Kehl-Bodrogi, B. Kellner-Heinkele, & A. Otter-Beaujean (Eds.), Syncretistic religious communities in the Near East (pp. 1–23). Numen Book Series.

Van Bruinessen, M. (2006). Kurdish paths to nation. In F. A. Jabar & H. Dawod (Eds.), The Kurds: Nationalism and politics (pp. 21 – 48). Saqi.

Van Bruinessen, M. (2020). Kürtlük, Türklük, Alevilik: Etnik ve dinsel kimlik mücadeleleri (14th ed.). İletişim Yayınları.

Vasquez, E. A., Wenborne, L., Peers, M., Alleyne, E., & Ellis, K. (2015). Any of them will do: In-group identification, out-group entitativity, and gang membership as predictors of group-based retribution. Aggressive Behavior, 41(3), 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21581

Verkuyten, M., & Yildiz, A. A. (2009). Muslim immigrants and religious group feelings: Self-identification and attitudes among Sunni and Alevi Turkish-Dutch. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 32(7), 1121–1142. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870802379312

Vojdik, K. V. (2010). Politics of the headscarf in Turkey: Masculinities, feminism, and the construction of collective identities. Harvard Journal of Law & Gender, 33(2), 661–685.

Warner, R. H., Kent, A. H., & Kiddoo, K. L. (2016). Perceived collective continuity and attitudes toward outgroups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(5), 595–608, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2202

WEF. (2021). Global gender gap report-2021. Retrieved 16 July, 2021, from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2021.pdf

Welbourne, J. L. (1999). The impact of perceived entitativity on inconsistency resolution for groups and individuals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(5), 481–508. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1999.1387

Whitley, B. E., Jr., & Kite, M. E. (2010). The psychology of prejudice and discrimination (2nd ed.). Wadsworth.

Wildschut, T., Insko, C. A., & Pinter, B. (2004). The perception of outgroup threat: Content and activation of the outgroup schema. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism (pp. 335–361). Psychology Press.

Williams, K. D. (2010). Dyads can be groups (and often are). Small Group Research, 41(2), 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496409358619

Yıldız, K. (2012). Turkey’s Kurdish conflict: Pathways to progress. Insight Turkey, 14(4), 151–174.

Yılmaz, O., Cesur, S., & Bayad, A. (2018). Türklerin ve Kürtlerin birbirlerine karşı olumsuz tutumlarının bazı psikolojik değişkenlerle İlişkisi [Psychological correlates of negative attitudes of Turks and Kurds toward one another]. Türk Psikoloji Yazilari, 21(Spec Iss), 82–102.

Yılmaz, U. (2012). Sosyal kimlik ve iyi oluş ilişkisi: Kahramanmaraş - Elbistan Alevileri örneği. [Masters’ thesis, Mersin University]. Turkish National Thesis Center.

Yzerbyt, V. Y., Castano, E., Leyens, J.-P., & Paladino, M.-P. (2000). The primacy of the ingroup: The interplay of entitativity and identification. European Review of Social Psychology, 11(1), 257–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792772043000059

Yzerbyt, V. Y., Corneille, O., & Estrada, C. (2001). The interplay of subjective essentialism and entitativity in the formation of stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(2), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0502_5

Yzerbyt, V. Y., Rogier, A., & Fiske, S. T. (1998). Group entitativity and social attribution: On translating situational constraints into stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(10), 1089–1103. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672982410006

Yzerbyt, V., Judd, C. M., & Corneille, O. (2004). Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism: Introduction and overview. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism (pp. 1–22). Psychology Press.

Zeidan, D. (1999). The Alevi of Anatolia. Middle East Review of International Affairs, 3(4), 74–89. Retrieved July 18, 2021, from https://ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu/olj/meria/meria99_zed02.html

Zeyneloğlu, S., Civelek, Y. H., & Coşkun, Y. (2011). Kürt sorununda antropolojik ve demografik boyut: Sayım ve araştırma verilerinden elde edilen bulgular [Anthropological and demographic dimensions of the Kurdish question: Findings from census and survey data]. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(1), 335–384.

Zyphur, M. J., & Islam, G. (2006). Toward understanding the existence of groups: The relationship between climate strength and entitativity. IBMEC Working Paper (WPE–12–2006). Retrieved June 10, 2018, from http://www.ibmecsp.edu.br.