Dental Amalgam Toksikolojisi
Özet
Dental amalgam, yüz yılı aşkın süredir düşük maliyeti, kolay uygulanabilirliği ve yüksek direnci sayesinde arka dişlerin restorasyonunda yaygın olarak kullanılan metalik bir materyaldir. Ancak içeriğindeki cıvanın potansiyel toksisitesi, tarih boyunca "amalgam savaşları" olarak adlandırılan büyük tartışmalara ve güvensizlik dönemlerine yol açmıştır. Yapılan kapsamlı bilimsel araştırmalar, çiğneme veya fırçalama gibi aktiviteler sırasında salınan cıva buharı miktarının uluslararası sağlık örgütleri tarafından belirlenen güvenli eşik değerlerin çok altında olduğunu kanıtlamaktadır. Epidemiyolojik ve klinik çalışmalar; dental amalgam varlığının yetişkinlerde böbrek fonksiyon bozukluğu, kronik yorgunluk, alzheimer veya multipl skleroz gibi nörodejeneratif hastalıklarla hiçbir nedensel bağı bulunmadığını ortaya koymuştur. Benzer şekilde, hamilelik sürecinde fetal gelişim ile doğum sonrasında çocukların nöropsikolojik ve renal işlevleri üzerinde olumsuz bir etkisi saptanmamıştır. Nadir görülen lokal alerjik reaksiyonlar ve hatalı atık yönetiminden kaynaklanan çevresel kaygılar dışında, mevcut bilimsel veriler cıva hijyenine uyulduğu sürece materyalin sistemik bir sağlık riski taşımadığını doğrulamaktadır. Sonuç olarak, fonksiyonel amalgam restorasyonların gereksiz yere sökülmesi diş yapısında geri dönüşsüz madde kaybına yol açtığından, materyalin klinik kullanımı geçerliliğini korumaktadır.
Dental amalgam has been widely used in posterior tooth restorations for over a century due to its low cost, ease of application, and high resistance. However, the potential toxicity of the mercury in its content has led to major controversies and periods of insecurity throughout history, termed as "amalgam wars". Extensive scientific research demonstrates that the amount of mercury vapor released during activities such as chewing or brushing is far below the safe threshold values determined by international health organizations. Epidemiological and clinical studies have revealed that the presence of dental amalgam has no causal link with neurodegenerative diseases such as multiple sclerosis or Alzheimer's, nor with chronic fatigue or renal dysfunction in adults. Similarly, no adverse effects have been detected on fetal development during pregnancy or on the neuropsychological and renal functions of children post-birth. Except for rare localized allergic reactions and environmental concerns arising from improper waste management, current scientific data confirms that the material poses no systemic health risk as long as mercury hygiene is strictly maintained. Consequently, since the unnecessary removal of functional amalgam restorations causes irreversible loss of tooth structure, the clinical use of this material remains entirely valid.
Referanslar
Abraham, J. E., Svare, C. W., Frank, C. W. The efect of dental amalgam restorations on blood mercury levels. Journal of Dental Research, 1984;63(1), 71–73.
American Dental Association (ADA) Council on Scientific Affairs. Dental amalgam: update on safety concerns. Journal of American Dental Association, 1998;129, 494–503. Doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1998.0252
Aminzadeh, K. K., Etminan, M. Dental amalgam and multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Public Health Dentistry, 2007;67(1), 64-66. Doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2007.00011.x
Arenholt-Bindsley, D. Dental amalgam – environmental aspects. Advances in Dental Research, 1992;6, 125-130. Doi: 10.1177/08959374920060010501
Bailer, J., Rist, F., Rudolf, A., et al. Adverse health effects related to mercury exposure from dental amalgam fillings: toxicological or psychological causes? Psychological Medicine, 2001;31(2), 255-63. Doi: 10.1017/s0033291701003233
Bains, V. K., Loomba, K., Loomba, A., et al. Mercury sensitisation: review, relevance and a clinical report. British Dental Journal, 2008;205(7), 373-378. Doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.843
Bates, M. N., Fawcett, J., Garrett, N., et al. Health effects of dental amalgam exposure: a retrospective cohort study. International Journal of Epidemiology, 2004;33(4), 894-902. Doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh164
Bauer, J. G., First, H. A. The toxicity of mercury in dental amalgam. The Journal of the California Dental Association, 1982;10(6), 47–61.
Bellinger, D. C., Daniel, D., Trachtenberg, F., et al. Dental amalgam restorations and children’s neuropsychological function: the New England Children’s Amalgam Trial. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2007a;115(3), 440-446. Doi: 10.1289/ehp.9497
Bellinger, D. C., Trachtenberg, F., Barregard, L., et al. Neuropsychological and renal effects of dental amalgam in children: a randomized clinical trial. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 2006;295(15), 1775-1783. Doi: 10.1001/jama.295.15.1775
Bellinger, D. C., Trachtenberg, F., Daniel, D., et al. A dose-effect analysis of children’s exposure to dental amalgam and neuropsychological function: the New England Children’s Amalgam Trial. Journal of American Dental Association, 2007b;138(9), 1210-1216. Doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0345
Bellinger, D. C., Trachtenberg, F., Zhang, A., et al. Dental amalgam and psychosocial status:the New England Children’s Amalgam Trial. Journal of Dental Research, 2008;87(5), 470-474. Doi: 10.1177/154405910808700504
Berdouses, E., Vaidyanathan, T.K., Dastane, A., et al. Mercury release from dental amalgams: an in vitro study under controlled chewing and brushing in an artificial mouth. Journal of Dental Research, 1995;74(5), 1185-1193. Doi: 10.1177/00220345950740050701
Berglund, A. Estimation by a 24-hour study of the daily dose of intra-oral mercury vapour inhaled after release from dental amalgam. Journal of Dental Research, 1990;69(10), 1646-1651. Doi: 10.1177/00220345900690100401
Boyd, N. D., Benediktsson, H., Vimy, M. J., et al. Mercury from dental ‘silver’ tooth fillings impairs sheep kidney function. American Journal of Physiology, 1991;261(4), R1010–R1014. Doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1991.261.4.R1010
Brodsky, J. B., Cohen, E. N., Whitcher, C., et al. Occupational exposure to mercury in dentistry and pregnancy outcome. Journal of American Dental Association, 1985;111(5), 779–780. Doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1985.0182
Brownawell A. M., Berent, S., Brent, R. L., et al. The potential adverse health effects of dental amalgam. Toxicological Reviews, 2005;24(1), 1-10. Doi: 10.2165/00139709-200524010-00001
Chin, G., Chong, J., Kluczewska, A., et al. The environmental effects of dental amalgam. Australian Dental Journal, 2000;45(4), 246-249. Doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2000.tb00258.x
Clarkson, T. W., Magos, L., Myers, G. J. The toxicology of mercury–current exposures and clinical manifestations. The New England Journal of Medicine, 2003;349(18), 1731–1737. Doi: 10.1056/NEJMra022471
Daniels, J. L., Rowland, A. S., Longnecker, M. P., et al. Maternal dental history, child’s birth outcome and early cognitive development. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 2007;21(5), 448-457. Doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00819.x
Danscher, G., Horsted-Bindslev, P., Rungby, J. Traces of mercury in organs from primates with amalgam fillings. Experimental and Molecular Pathology, 1990;52(3), 291–299. Doi: 10.1016/0014-4800(90)90070-t
DeRouen, T. A., Martin, M. D., Leroux, B. G., et al. Neurobehavioral effects of dental amalgam in children: a randomized clinical trial. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 2006;295(15), 1784-1792. Doi: 10.1001/jama.295.15.1784
Donovan, T. E., Handlers, J. P. A rational policy on the use of dental amalgam. The Journal of the California Dental Association, 1984;12(2), 10–12.
Dunn, J. E., Trachtenberg, F. L., Barregard, L., et al. Scalp hair and urine mercury content of children in the Northeast United States: the New England Children’s Amalgam Trial. Environmental Research, 2008;107(1), 79-88. Doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2007.08.015
Eames, W. B. Preparation and condensation of amalgam with a low mercury alloy ratio. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 1959;58(4), 78-83.
Eggleston, D. W., Nylander, M. Correlation of dental amalgam with mercury in brain tissue. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1987;58(6), 704–707. Doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(87)90424-0
Frykholm, K. O. (1957) On mercury from dental amalgam: its toxic and allergic efects, and some comments on occupational hygiene. Almquist & Wiksell.
Forte, G., Petrucci, F., Bocca, B. Metal allergens of growing significance: epidemiology, immunotoxicology, strategies for testing and prevention. Inflammation & Allergy- Drug Targets, 2008;7(3), 145-162. Doi: 10.2174/187152808785748146
Geier, D. A., Kern, J. K., Geier, M. R. A prospective study of prenatal mercury exposure from maternal dental amalgams and autism severity. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 2009;69(2), 189–197.
George, G. N., Singh, S. P., J. Hoover, J., et al. The chemical forms of mercury in aged and fresh dental amalgam surfaces. Chemical Research in Toxicology, 2009;22(11), 1761–1764. Doi: 10.1021/tx900309c
Greener, E.H. Amalgam—yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Operative Dentistry, 1979;4(1), 24–35.
Halbach, S., Vogt, S., Köhler, W., et al. Blood and urine mercury levels in adult amalgam patients of a randomized controlled trial: interaction of Hg species in erythrocytes. Environmental Research, 2008;107(1), 69-78. Doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2007.07.005
Hoover, A. W., Goldwater, L. J. Absorption and excretion of mercury in man. X. Dental amalgams as a source of urinary mercury. Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health, 1966;12(4), 506–508.
Hujoel, P. P., Lydon-Rochelle, M., Bollen, A. M., et al. Mercury exposure from dental illing placement during pregnancy and low birth weight risk. American Journal of Epidemiology, 2005;161(8), 734–740. Doi: 10.1093/aje/kwi100
Innes, D. B., Youdelis, W. V. Dispersion strengthened amalgam. Journal of the Canadian Dental Association, 1963;29, 587-93.
Kingman, A., Albers, J. W., Arezzo, J. C., et al. Amalgam exposure and neurological function. Neurotoxicology, 2005;26(2), 241-255. Doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2004.09.008
Lauterbach, M., Martins, I. P., Castro-Caldas, A., et al. Neurological outcomes in children with and without amalgam-related mercury exposure: seven years of longitudinal observations in a randomized trial. Journal of American Dental Association, 2008;139(2), 138-145. Doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0128
Leinfelder, K. The enigma of dental amalgam. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 2004;16(1), 3–5. Doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2004.tb00442.x
4Levy, M., Schwartz, S., Dijak, M., et al. Childhood urine mercury excretion: dental amalgam and fish consumption as exposure factors. Environmental Research, 2004;94(3), 283-290. Doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2003.07.004
Life Sciences Research Organization (LSRO) (2014). Report on Health Effects of Mercury from Dental Amalgam. http://www.lsro.org/presentation_files/amalgam/amalgam_execsum.pdf
Lindbohm, M-L., Ylöstalo, P., Sallmen, M., et al. Occupational exposure in dentistry and miscarriage. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 2007;64(2), 127–133. Doi: 10.1136/oem.2005.026039
Lorscheider, F. L., Vimy, M. J., Summers, A. O. Mercury exposure from “silver” tooth firings: emerging evidence questions a traditional dental paradigm. FASEB J. 1995;9(7), 504–508.
Luglie, P. F., Campus, G., Chessa, G., etr al. Effect of amalgam fillings on the mercury concentration in human amniotic fluid. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2005;271(2), 138-142. Doi: 10.1007/s00404-003-0578-6
Lygre, G. B., Haug, K., Skjaerven, R., et al. Prenatal exposure to dental amalgam and pregnancy outcome. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 2016;44(5), 442–449. Doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12233
Mackert Jr, J. R. Dental amalgam and mercury. Journal of American Dental Association, 1991;122(8), 54–61.
Mackert Jr, J. R. Factors afecting estimation of dental amalgam mercury exposure from measurements of mercury vapor levels in intra-oral and expired air. Journal of Dental Research, 1987;66(12), 1775–1780.
Mackert Jr, J. R., Berglund, A. Mercury exposure from dental amalgam illings: absorbed dose and the potential for adverse health effects. Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, 1997;8(4), 410–436. Doi: 10.1177/10454411970080040401
Mackert Jr, J.R., Wahl, M. J. Are there acceptable alternatives to amalgam? The Journal of the California Dental Association, 2004;32(7), 601–610.
McCullough, M. J., Tyas, M. J. Local adverse effects of amalgam restorations. International Dental Journal, 2008;58(1), 3-9. Doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595x.2008.tb00170.x
Molin, C. Amalgam--fact and fiction. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research, 1992;100(1), 66-73. Doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1992.tb01811.x
Molin, M., Bergman, B., Marklund, S. L., et al. Mercury, selenium, and glutathione peroxidase before and after amalgam removal in man. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 1990;48(3), 189–202. Doi: 10.3109/00016359009005875
Needleman, H. L. Mercury in dental amalgam—a neurotoxic risk? The Journal of the American Medical Association, 2006;295(15), 1835–1836. Doi: 10.1001/jama.295.15.1835
Nylander, M., Friberg, L., Lind, B. Mercury concentrations in the human brain and kidneys in relation to exposure from dental amalgam fillings. Swedish Dental Journal, 1987;11(5), 179–187.
Palkovicova, L., Ursinyova, M., Masanova, V., et al. Maternal amalgam dental fillings as the source of mercury exposure in developing fetus and newborn. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 2008;18(3), 326-331. Doi: 10.1038/sj.jes.7500606
Patterson, J. E., Weissberg, B. G., Dennison, P. J. Mercury in human breath from dental amalgams. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 1985;34(4), 459–468. Doi: 10.1007/BF01609761
Rathore, M., Singh, A., Pant, V. A. The dental amalgam toxicity fear: a myth or actuality. Toxicology International, 2012;19(2), 81-88. Doi: 10.4103/0971-6580.97191
Roberson, T. M., Heymann, H. O., Swift, E. J. (2006) Sturdevant’s Art and Science of Operative Dentistry (Fifth edit). Missouri: Mosby Inc.
Rogers, M. D. Status of scrap (recyclable) dental amalgam asenvironmental health hazards of toxic substances. Journal of American Dental Association, 1989;119(1), 159-166. Doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1989.0118
Roulet, J. F. Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coloured alternatives to amalgam. Journal of Dentistry, 1997; 25(6), 459–473. Doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(96)00066-8
Saxe, S. R., Snowdon, D. A., Wekstein, M. W., et al. Dental amalgam and cognitive function in older women: findings from the Nun Study. Journal of American Dental Association, 1995;126(11), 1495–1501. Doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1995.0078
Saxe, S. R., Wekstein, M. W., Kryscio, R. J., et al. Alzheimer’s disease, dental amalgam and mercury. Journal of American Dental Association, 1999;130(2), 191–199. Doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1999.0168
Smart, E. R., McLead, R. I., Lawrence, C. M. Resolution of lichen planus following removal of amalgam restorations in patients with proven allergy to mercury salts: a pilot study. British Dental Journal, 1995;178(3), 108-112. Doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4808663
Souder, W., Sweeney, A. B. Is mercury poisonous in dental amalgam restorations? The Dental Cosmos, 1931;73, 1145–1152.
Stock, A. Die gefahrlichkeit des quecksilberdampfes und der amalgame [Danger from mercury and from amalgam fillings]. Medizinische Klinik, 1926; 22, 1209-1212.
Svare, C. W., Peterson, L. C., Reinhardt, J. W., et al. The effect of dental amalgams on mercury levels in expired air. Journal of Dental Research, 1981;60(9), 1668–1671.Doi:10.1177/00220345810600090601
Uçar, Y., Brantley, W. A. Biocompatibility of Dental Amalgams. International Journal of Dentistry, 2011;2011, 981595. Doi: 10.1155/2011/981595
United States Food and Drug Administration (2020). FDA Safety Communication. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/safety-communications/recommendations-about-use-dental-amalgam-certain-high-risk-populations-fda-safety-communication
Vimy, M. J., Lorscheider, F. L. Serial measurements of intra-oral air mercury: estimation of daily dose from dental amalgam. Journal of Dental Research, 1985;64(8), 1072–1075.
Woods, J. S., Martin, M. D., Leroux, B. G., et al. The contribution of dental amalgam to urinary mercury excretion in children. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2007;115(10), 1527-1531. Doi: 10.1289/ehp.10249
